Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][GRE] GreenCoin - A Blockchain-Based Social Carbon Ecosystem - page 18. (Read 80403 times)

hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 504
me and chris agreed that it might be a better idea to enable POW. In roughly 2 weeks time there will be a hard fork to enable POW again making the coin a POW/POS hybrid. Block reward as of yet is un-decided but the remaining code has been written

Ahmed

I support this brilliant decision, POS at this time with a little amount of non-producers holders just kept the GRE from widespread distribution.
What are your parameters to decide the bock reward?
I will thank with a donation if it hit success.
hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 1000
nope. since GRE is a POS coin, it cannot support auxpow

Ahmed
legendary
Activity: 1612
Merit: 1608
精神分析的爸
me and chris agreed that it might be a better idea to enable POW. In roughly 2 weeks time there will be a hard fork to enable POW again making the coin a POW/POS hybrid. Block reward as of yet is un-decided but the remaining code has been written

Ahmed

Will it support auxpow as before the fork to POS?

hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 1000
me and chris agreed that it might be a better idea to enable POW. In roughly 2 weeks time there will be a hard fork to enable POW again making the coin a POW/POS hybrid. Block reward as of yet is un-decided but the remaining code has been written

Ahmed
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 504
It sounds like maybe someone else would be better at running this coin experiment than me.

No, No Chris it doesn't mean that you are not capable, take it in a positive sense.
But we need to revive the coin. This is a do or die situation.
The real problem now is lack of funds, form a good team and secure development fund.
The theme behind this project is not the one that can easily be dumped, its has value to be unlocked.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Screw that man.....this is your vision!  A developer willing to work on the coin that believes in that vision is what it seems to me this project needs.....sucks such a difficult task to accomplish with all these shit coins others are willing to invest their time into:-(
hero member
Activity: 579
Merit: 500
CoinQuacker
It sounds like maybe someone else would be better at running this coin experiment than me.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 504
Thank you for your reply Ahmed.

Chris, now its clear that, the lack of fund is the hindrance, its a fact!
So, Chris, there should be a plan to form a fund from ICO via bitcointalk or better via any social/crowd fundraising sites.

Inshort, we need an action.
hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 1000
The only thing stopping me from working on gre is lack of funds. Ive offered my coins up for sale. Anyone that wants to speed things up should buy them off me. And any dev you approach is going to ask the same.

Ahmed
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 504
Chris,
May be the dev must consider a public ICO for the revival.
And it will help to hire a professional team for the development of the coin.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 504
At this time GRE have any network issues or forking issues.

Exchange Listing is very important for the life of GRE, each unlisted day will make it disastrous.
No developments are seeing for this coins besides promise given by the dev team.
If dev team have no time for this coin it will be good to form a new dev team for this coin.
At the present time it seems devs are not even interested in this coin.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
As far as I know the size of the wallet should not effect forking. Forking is a network issue. I am one of those very large wallets as I have been a part of this since the beginning and I agree with digit if we could just trade these GRE I would sell off quite a bit. That would reduce my stake and make it easier for smaller wallets to make a profit. On another note, when yobits first forked, my wallet was forked with it and I didn't notice for almost a month so I was out of the staking for awhile but I am back in now. Some smaller users may just bee feeling the impact of whales reentering the pool.

Same here....I too was staking for at least a couple weeks on a fork without knowing, part of reason I just stopped staking.  But was also told the larger wallets were causing some of the issues with forking.  Personally I think is really bad mistake to take this back onto an exchange with network issues, likely to do more harm to the coin than good.  Besides this project has been there done that.  What we really need right now is a stable network, that should be primary focus.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
As far as I know the size of the wallet should not effect forking. Forking is a network issue. I am one of those very large wallets as I have been a part of this since the beginning and I agree with digit if we could just trade these GRE I would sell off quite a bit. That would reduce my stake and make it easier for smaller wallets to make a profit. On another note, when yobits first forked, my wallet was forked with it and I didn't notice for almost a month so I was out of the staking for awhile but I am back in now. Some smaller users may just bee feeling the impact of whales reentering the pool.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
That seems odd since people with large wallets were causing problems with forking.  Being the first person besides Chris to register a solar system with Green, I hold a decent chunk myself and I think I stopped staking around 3 weeks ago.....at least until wallet issue is resolved.  Up until then I was only staking 1 million coins for couple weeks prior......so I'm not sure how people could be staking those really large wallets without causing problems or forking constantly.
hero member
Activity: 579
Merit: 500
CoinQuacker
The blockchain looks like it got stuck on block 122057 about 10 hours ago. Ahmed thinks there is a difficulty algo issue and was committed to working on it after spending some time on another coin. This looks like it will go forward in the near future. I'll let him update about that, and we are all looking forward to it.

My sensibility on yobit: the deposit has been closed for quite some time and there probably exists some total amount of coin within their trading ecosystem that is a small microcosm of all existing GRE that traders are just sending back and forth. I have little doubt that with a strengthened coin update, along with the marketing component and web upgrades (facelift and ability to handle orders of magnitude more users) that I've been working on with other collaborators, we could back up the project with real value in a matter of a couple of months or less.
hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 1000
I've no idea. Someone here said they were re-scanning theyre wallet weeks ago

Ahmed
hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 1000
It's not a case of trust, It's a case of needing food and a roof over my head...

Ahmed
hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 1000
I have 5636000 coins, Anyone willing to buy them from me at 12 sat?

Ahmed
hero member
Activity: 579
Merit: 500
CoinQuacker
I resolved it. The solution was to delete everything except .conf and .exe let the blockchain download with a new wallet.dat then delete that new wallet.dat and restore my old one. Then I had to force the prog to rescan with the -rescan switch. That seems to have resolved the issue.

it's currently a pain in the ass but I'm glad you got it. The pending update will hopefully help greatly.

On the positive side, all of these coins essentially work the same way so having this knowledge is helpful for alt-cryptos in general.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
I resolved it. The solution was to delete everything except .conf and .exe let the blockchain download with a new wallet.dat then delete that new wallet.dat and restore my old one. Then I had to force the prog to rescan with the -rescan switch. That seems to have resolved the issue.
Pages:
Jump to: