Author

Topic: [ANN][GRS] Groestlcoin | 1st to activate Segwit | Building Lightning Network - page 184. (Read 558212 times)

full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
Yep, it seems that MintPal depositing/retrieving has resumed. Coast is clear Grin
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
We've just hardforked.

All pools seem to be operating correctly.

Block #100,000 was found by hora @ cpu-pool
Nice work!!!

Yes - excellent work srcxxx
Smooth as ICE

 Cool Cool Cool



You are doing a great job! Smiley
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
We've just hardforked.

All pools seem to be operating correctly.

Block #100,000 was found by hora @ cpu-pool
Nice work!!!

Yes - excellent work srcxxx
Smooth as ICE

 Cool Cool Cool

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
EVERYTHING OK WITH MINTPAL!

Seems to have kicked in now  Huh

NO idea what caused delay.
Business as usual!

just bought another 10k Wink




full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
WARNING

OK - Have just tried sending MintPal a small GRS transaction and it has not been received . I suspect they have not updated GRS wallets!

I do not want to create further panic, just want to corroborate what CH said: REFRAIN from depositing GRS to Mintpal!
I too tried sending 1 GRS to the platform and it seems that, even if they updated the wallet, transactions are "stuck" or something.

Tx seems to have passed through the blockchain but does not appear in the Mintpal wallet.


Consider this a warning and nothing else, until things clear out.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
WARNING
EVERYTHING COOL

OK - Have just tried sending MintPal a small GRS transaction and it has not been received . I suspect they have not updated GRS wallets!
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
OK assuming mintpal sent transaction which ive not received is there a command i can run in console to get wallet to recheck??
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
MintPal did update wallet right?
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
An interesting article today about the possibility of a 51% attack on Litecoin: http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/warning-litecoin-miners-need-leave-coinotron/2014/05/20

We have a similar issue. Please spread your hashes to smaller pools.

* groestlcoin.biz now has per-worker stats: http://groestlcoin.biz/workers

* grs.cryptohunger.com has a special promotion for newly joined 100+ MHs miners: 0% fee forever

We are also working on implementing P2Pool for Groestlcoin.
full member
Activity: 156
Merit: 100
Guido
We've just hardforked.

All pools seem to be operating correctly.

Block #100,000 was found by hora @ cpu-pool
Nice work!!!
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
We've just hardforked.

All pools seem to be operating correctly.

Block #100,000 was found by hora @ cpu-pool

PS: Block explorer at grs.42tx.com is not working due to outdated wallet, use this block explorer for now: http://groestlcoin.org/block_crawler.php
full member
Activity: 156
Merit: 100
Guido
I received my first bill from the electric company minning 100% groestlcoin.
My cost has been reduced by 57% than scrypt.... Kiss
Im very happy whit this coin!!!!
Successes whit the fork!!!
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
(●´ω´●) Nil de nihilo fit
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
HARD FORK AT 100K!

ARe u ready?
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Per worker statistics added to the official "simple" GRS pool: http://groestlcoin.biz/workers
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 252
groestl algorythm doesn't use ram at all.
if you downclock the ram you'll be able to overclock the core more (and use less power).
But still shortening your GPU's life.

Not necessarily. Higher voltage and higher temperatures as secondary effects of higher clock speed decrease a GPU's life, not the higher clock speed itself.
If you overclock the core (and underclock the RAM) and manage to keep voltage levels and temperature low it won't hurt your GPU.

For example, I have a HD6950 running at 875 core 600 RAM with 1.05v, stock is 800 / 1250 / 1.125V. The card uses less electricity and is cooler, while increasing the hashrate about 10%.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
groestl algorythm doesn't use ram at all.
if you downclock the ram you'll be able to overclock the core more (and use less power).
But still shortening your GPU's life.
full member
Activity: 231
Merit: 100
Can this be real:O?




Now almost 8000 mhs.


Somebody got an updated miner? hacks?
It is real,I did heard that someone in China had a recoded and improved miner which has 2X or more hashrate,and then I stoped mining.
that is why price is going down.
we should do something,plz vote at http://groestlcoin.org/forum/index.php?topic=90.0

its a code war, and china is wining with whatever they did with the miner, how will groesl react? watch next ep.


Again- where is the evidence for this?

UPDATE: Miner has stopped
sorry late to reply.
no evidence,I am not sure.was heard from a qq group

4000 Mhs is back again. He alone makes for the half of the pool. He would easily dump all of his coins Undecided
look at the top rich list,coins of the bighashrate owner were already dumped,no need to worry about some big dump
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
groestl algorythm doesn't use ram at all.
if you downclock the ram you'll be able to overclock the core more (and use less power).
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
Hi all miners!

I experimented with different setups regarding mining with R9 280x as I was getting 6.4 MH/s - and somewhere was quoted that 7.1 MH/s was possible.

I was able to push the hashmark to 6.8 MH/s by setting the gpu clock to 1180 and downclocking the ram clock to 1000.

But I have to admit - I have a lot of GPUs - the gpu got hotter a bit (but not as much as with Scrypt), but when I downlocked the gpu clock to 1140 - 1160 - I got 6.6 - 6.7 with a lot less heating.

It seems we're at the same game of optimizing mem clocking. Experienced Scrypt miners know that some guy, 'stilt' optimized original BIOSses - so that each gpu was really pushing the hashrate to the max. Unfortunately, he set all settings to 1500 memclock - and now I downclocked the mem to 1000 - and it would be nice if I'd somehow be able to optimize BIOS RAM settings. If I'd be able to optimize settings for 1000 MHz ramclock - I guess 7.1 MH/s would be achievable with 1140 gpuclock.

Until then - a little of tweaking can bring the hash rate somewhere to 6.8 MH/s - but I lowered gpu clocks - as 1180 or anything above 1100 MHz seem to me quite over the edge.

But all things being equal - a normal hashrate of R 280x (Groestl algo) would be around 6.6 - 6.7 MH/s. Everything over 7 MH/s - if there is no optimized BIOS - would be suicidial - or at least the life of the GPU would be shortened quite a bit. So please don't quote on the main page that some 280x is able to achieve 7.1 MH/s. That might be the case, but the card is pushed onto a razor thin edge - and this 7.1 MH/s is really not a common case.


I will try it.

p.s. underclock mem to 1000 and push core core to 1150 if possible. Try a different TC for experimentation , see spreadsheet.
Jump to: