Seriously the gap between your soft cap and your hard cap can't make any sense to me. Anyone founding a business should be able to precisely define how much money they actually need to get off the ground. Of course, anyone could say "If we collect a billion we can build more stuff faster", but that's not the point when it comes to raising money. In my eyes it doesn't look very professional to say that 5 million is the minimum to start successfully and almost 100 million would also be fine.
20 times the difference between caps - absolutely normal in projects. This is not so noticeable when the project has a min cap of 1.5 million, a max cap of 30 million. Mathematics is still the same. The difference, too.
Only in contrast to most projects, where the increase in fees is an expansion of the project, we are increasing the number of markets, not territories. For example, take the majority of microfinance projects. With the increase in the number of fees, they begin to increase the number of countries in which they are going to work. Is expanding only the geography, but the project's functionality is changing little. At us with increase in number of gathering there is a linear expansion of the functions and the occupied markets. Each of which requires tens of millions of dollars. So we say:
5 million - a minimum for the release of their own devices
10 - in addition to everything white label
30 - in addition to everything the big data
50 - in addition to everything - blockchain for neurotech
97 - in addition to everything the laboratory for all developers, where we'll teach everyone to do products with control technology using the "power of thought"
When each point of fees is reached, additional markets are added in addition (not to be confused with the expansion of the project geography): + Wearable devices, + VR, + IOT, + smart house, + Medicine, + B2B solutions and so...
Even if we do not attract all 97 million at once - we will finance these areas from our company profits. But it will take a lot longer. That's why we suggest everyone to bring the future closer to themselves, everyone.
I still tend to disagree and that counts for the 1.5 million to 30 million as well. Anyone who ever started a business knows that a core focus is the most important thing in the beginning and its execution essential to the future success of the business. Saying that you could build a 97 million dollar business as easily as a 5 million dollar business just doesn't make sense. Why not build the 5 million dollar business successfully first, give shareholders tremendous upside potential and then raise more money in another round from smart contract locked tokens?