[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 348.

cevap

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 10

www.Zercados.com

Quote from: hicaribou on February 23, 2018, 11:53:19 AM

Quote from: omwibya on February 23, 2018, 11:23:15 AM

Quote from: hicaribou on February 23, 2018, 11:17:46 AM

Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.

it's way too early for that. they need to develop the product first and then shopping around.

Its not about the time actually , i think their team has a big connection in this field/sector, so it can bring this to some potential users that will say "Hey i want to user this platform once its ready."
If it really happened, It would be good if they tell the community about it.

Even the most patient users will forget about the platform in 5-year time, too long still to aim for customers. If there's no product, no demo, no something, you can say whatever you want about potential user amount, in reality it will still be different.

hicaribou

hero member

Activity: 815

Merit: 502

Quote from: omwibya on February 23, 2018, 11:23:15 AM

Quote from: hicaribou on February 23, 2018, 11:17:46 AM

Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.

it's way too early for that. they need to develop the product first and then shopping around.

Its not about the time actually , i think their team has a big connection in this field/sector, so it can bring this to some potential users that will say "Hey i want to user this platform once its ready."
If it really happened, It would be good if they tell the community about it.

omwibya

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: hicaribou on February 23, 2018, 11:17:46 AM

Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.

it's way too early for that. they need to develop the product first and then shopping around.

hicaribou

hero member

Activity: 815

Merit: 502

Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.

lacadera

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Good ideas, best of wishes to the dev team!

belechau

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 100

Quote from: Frank37 on February 23, 2018, 10:53:55 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on February 23, 2018, 10:38:46 AM

Quote from: sambuki on February 23, 2018, 10:29:06 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on February 23, 2018, 08:50:18 AM

Quote from: cevap on February 23, 2018, 05:31:20 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on February 23, 2018, 04:57:41 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on February 23, 2018, 04:26:08 AM

Quote from: Herad Hedid on February 23, 2018, 02:33:00 AM

Quote from: sltshp on February 23, 2018, 02:10:20 AM

Health on the blockchain is always wonderful. We need more projects to care about people health rather than wealth

The sad thing is that most of the people in the crypto market are just here for the money. That's why projects like eHealth don't get that much attention.

But that is not a problem just blockchain and crypto is facing. A lot of projects outside of blockchain also just get money if there is potential to make a lot of money with. Just thing about technology in general or the pharma industry. They don't do research to just help people. Big pharma concerns are just doing research for new medicine etc if they can sell it.

A working eHealth platform is something that will change people's life. Investing now is smarter but also harder for most people due to the long roadmap. It's a bit sad.

I think that big and institutional invests have more capacity to invest in something long-term rather than individuals, they can see the perks of a 5-year investment, they also have more disposable income. Maybe that's why eHealth has such a long privale placement round.

Yes, I also think that there are some big players needed and I am quite sure they will find them. If they get some big partnerships I am also sure that this will build enough trust for smaller investors to invest at least a bit for a long hold.

Big partnership for sure will boost the popularity of a project. The hardest part is to find or to make such partnership.

yes that would be great. How about some partnership with wearable producers? I'd love to see that

Iam sure they are negotiating already with such producers, it would be the perfect partnership.

In fact great partnerships should be announced after the ICO, there will certainly be large-scale interest for this, there is currently a possibility of partnerships with other Icos, or even with services that complement them, such as security and the like, Time has the potential for this perception , or better. The SelfKey project for example has made great partnerships to carry out KYC in ICos

Frickeladm

jr. member

Activity: 182

Merit: 1

Quote from: king_of_alts on February 23, 2018, 10:56:03 AM