Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 422. (Read 97848 times)

sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 261
February 01, 2018, 05:54:05 AM
For funding the EHF Project, the following investment size at Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1 is necessary:
 Soft Cap – $ 2 000 000;
 Hard Cap– $ 210 000 000.


Why is the difference between soft cap and hard cap 100 times? This is a big difference. By the way, in white paper you only have:
Table 5-1. Proposed Budget Items of the EHF Project 2018-2028 (based on Hard Cap at the Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1).
Where is the table for Investment Plan for soft cap?

Softcap usually indicates the minimum amount for project continuation. So I guess even if ICO will gather only $2 mil, the project will go on, the question is how fast...
I'd also want to see some numbers in case only softcap will be raised, but I think the number will be much higher. If I'm not mistaken, devs said that they are negotiating with private investors, and imo majority of investments here will come from private or institutional investors.

that's what I though. the softcap is the minimum amount for proof of interest. hard cap is the amount needed to develop the project fully.

That's a very interesting way of describing soft cap and hard cap.

Hard cap is amount to limit the funding to come in. Doesn't necessarily means amount needed . Amount needed are beyond the soft cap
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 104
February 01, 2018, 05:44:43 AM
For funding the EHF Project, the following investment size at Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1 is necessary:
 Soft Cap – $ 2 000 000;
 Hard Cap– $ 210 000 000.


Why is the difference between soft cap and hard cap 100 times? This is a big difference. By the way, in white paper you only have:
Table 5-1. Proposed Budget Items of the EHF Project 2018-2028 (based on Hard Cap at the Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1).
Where is the table for Investment Plan for soft cap?

Softcap usually indicates the minimum amount for project continuation. So I guess even if ICO will gather only $2 mil, the project will go on, the question is how fast...
I'd also want to see some numbers in case only softcap will be raised, but I think the number will be much higher. If I'm not mistaken, devs said that they are negotiating with private investors, and imo majority of investments here will come from private or institutional investors.
210 million is a large sum, even given that the road map will last until 2025. Let's hope that several private investors would be ready to become sponsors and will be able to achieve this hard cap.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
February 01, 2018, 05:44:34 AM
For funding the EHF Project, the following investment size at Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1 is necessary:
 Soft Cap – $ 2 000 000;
 Hard Cap– $ 210 000 000.


Why is the difference between soft cap and hard cap 100 times? This is a big difference. By the way, in white paper you only have:
Table 5-1. Proposed Budget Items of the EHF Project 2018-2028 (based on Hard Cap at the Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1).
Where is the table for Investment Plan for soft cap?

Softcap usually indicates the minimum amount for project continuation. So I guess even if ICO will gather only $2 mil, the project will go on, the question is how fast...
I'd also want to see some numbers in case only softcap will be raised, but I think the number will be much higher. If I'm not mistaken, devs said that they are negotiating with private investors, and imo majority of investments here will come from private or institutional investors.

that's what I though. the softcap is the minimum amount for proof of interest. hard cap is the amount needed to develop the project fully.
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
February 01, 2018, 05:32:54 AM
For funding the EHF Project, the following investment size at Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1 is necessary:
 Soft Cap – $ 2 000 000;
 Hard Cap– $ 210 000 000.


Why is the difference between soft cap and hard cap 100 times? This is a big difference. By the way, in white paper you only have:
Table 5-1. Proposed Budget Items of the EHF Project 2018-2028 (based on Hard Cap at the Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1).
Where is the table for Investment Plan for soft cap?

Softcap usually indicates the minimum amount for project continuation. So I guess even if ICO will gather only $2 mil, the project will go on, the question is how fast...
I'd also want to see some numbers in case only softcap will be raised, but I think the number will be much higher. If I'm not mistaken, devs said that they are negotiating with private investors, and imo majority of investments here will come from private or institutional investors.
hero member
Activity: 1736
Merit: 857
February 01, 2018, 05:26:16 AM
For funding the EHF Project, the following investment size at Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1 is necessary:
 Soft Cap – $ 2 000 000;
 Hard Cap– $ 210 000 000.


Why is the difference between soft cap and hard cap 100 times? This is a big difference. By the way, in white paper you only have:
Table 5-1. Proposed Budget Items of the EHF Project 2018-2028 (based on Hard Cap at the Pre-ICO and ICO, Round 1).
Where is the table for Investment Plan for soft cap?
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 115
February 01, 2018, 05:24:20 AM
It might be very cool if Ehealth would partner up with Google or Apple and store all of that health data from those smartwatches and other IOT devices .

I second the idea too. Wearable accessories that will do better than the current band of smart watches. As we all know, early detection is the key in health care.


That is a smart idea! Big companies invested in wearable technologies would be very much interested with this project.

If ehealth does not raise millions and have a beta product I think those companies will probably start their own. They already have the resources, they will probably research the market first before leaping out

I'm pretty sure they are already busy with things like this..but ..eHealth has some pretty big names behind it.

The trend nowadays seems to be for the big companies to buy the high-potential smaller companies outright - instead of trying to come up with something new.

It is often better to buy out the whole startup than to reverse engineer the idea. However, with the ICO money they should be able to stay independent.

All this talk about new platforms being bought by big companies looks a bit weird to me, because if they would want to sell the idea, they would do it, they wouldn't go that far as ICO or roadmap till 2025 etc. Otherwise, what are we investing in for?
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
February 01, 2018, 05:11:24 AM
It might be very cool if Ehealth would partner up with Google or Apple and store all of that health data from those smartwatches and other IOT devices .

I second the idea too. Wearable accessories that will do better than the current band of smart watches. As we all know, early detection is the key in health care.


That is a smart idea! Big companies invested in wearable technologies would be very much interested with this project.

If ehealth does not raise millions and have a beta product I think those companies will probably start their own. They already have the resources, they will probably research the market first before leaping out

I'm pretty sure they are already busy with things like this..but ..eHealth has some pretty big names behind it.

The trend nowadays seems to be for the big companies to buy the high-potential smaller companies outright - instead of trying to come up with something new.

It is often better to buy out the whole startup than to reverse engineer the idea. However, with the ICO money they should be able to stay independent.
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
February 01, 2018, 04:53:21 AM
It might be very cool if Ehealth would partner up with Google or Apple and store all of that health data from those smartwatches and other IOT devices .

I second the idea too. Wearable accessories that will do better than the current band of smart watches. As we all know, early detection is the key in health care.


That is a smart idea! Big companies invested in wearable technologies would be very much interested with this project.

If ehealth does not raise millions and have a beta product I think those companies will probably start their own. They already have the resources, they will probably research the market first before leaping out

I'm pretty sure they are already busy with things like this..but ..eHealth has some pretty big names behind it.

The trend nowadays seems to be for the big companies to buy the high-potential smaller companies outright - instead of trying to come up with something new.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 263
February 01, 2018, 04:36:50 AM
It might be very cool if Ehealth would partner up with Google or Apple and store all of that health data from those smartwatches and other IOT devices .

I second the idea too. Wearable accessories that will do better than the current band of smart watches. As we all know, early detection is the key in health care.


That is a smart idea! Big companies invested in wearable technologies would be very much interested with this project.

If ehealth does not raise millions and have a beta product I think those companies will probably start their own. They already have the resources, they will probably research the market first before leaping out

I'm pretty sure they are already busy with things like this..but ..eHealth has some pretty big names behind it.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 252
February 01, 2018, 04:08:11 AM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.
Yeah, but even before the ico it's important that everything goes smooth as planned. And after the ico as well. But the ico stage is one of the most crucial ones, here you are right
Let's look at things realistically. Not is what is not important stages in the development of the project! All stages are very important! Whether it's ICO, the marketing, the conclusion of preliminary agreements, symposiums, the design of future field activities, etc.


All stages are important. They are related to each other. Token sale for example, will not succeed if the marketing stage does not run as expected. A project is one unity!
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 261
February 01, 2018, 02:59:52 AM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.
Yeah, but even before the ico it's important that everything goes smooth as planned. And after the ico as well. But the ico stage is one of the most crucial ones, here you are right
Let's look at things realistically. Not is what is not important stages in the development of the project! All stages are very important! Whether it's ICO, the marketing, the conclusion of preliminary agreements, symposiums, the design of future field activities, etc.


i don't share your opinion. theres a common phrase "first things first" and so it is with this project it is too large to do all at once

I agree to all things as once is a bad move. I guess they have detailed roadmap in their whitepaper ?
hero member
Activity: 1736
Merit: 857
February 01, 2018, 02:01:44 AM
The Project is designed for the period starting with January 2018 (real start of the Project will be on July 2018) until the end of 2028.

8. Each subsequent Round will start 12 months or later after the end of the previous one.
It means, for example, ICO, Round 2 will not start, if the EHF Token market price is lower than one on ICO, Round 1.
9. All unsold during ICO tokens will be burned.


Does this mean that subsequent rounds can be stretched in time for many years, until 2028? In addition to burning in each round of unsold tokens, what other actions will be taken to maintain and increase the price of tokens?
Also, you do not have a fixed number of tokens to sell in rounds 2 and 3. There are 55 million tokens allocated for these rounds, but how many of them are for round 2? Is it possible that you will not burn tokens at round 2 at all, and these unsold tokens will be sold in round 3?
jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 2
February 01, 2018, 01:39:38 AM
WhitePaper will be a watershed in this ICO, it will show us what is left to understand, and understand the complexity of the project and the need to extend its roadmap. I believe that after the WPP we will really understand the greatness of Ehealt, even for those who are still skeptical of this
Yes, all will clear up next week - this project can be grand, I hope that it will be so. Medicine is large segment - in combination with blockchain technology this can give revolutionary results.
I'm gonna be one of the firsts to try the EHealth brand-new services. I waited for too long for such a company to ever come up online

that's what's great about this new wave of ICO's . new companies can try different approaches.

But they do need a lot of people / network to be succesfull, and with lots of competition it means ICO's are trying to pull in the same people

Yup, only the strong ones will survive and I think this project is the one to bet on!

I see there are a lot of health project popping out but they are not as close as this one by comparing team and project functionalities. This is a fact.


this is a long term runner I think the others might look fancy on the first view but I can't imagine they have the performance like that
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1416
February 01, 2018, 01:25:02 AM
WhitePaper will be a watershed in this ICO, it will show us what is left to understand, and understand the complexity of the project and the need to extend its roadmap. I believe that after the WPP we will really understand the greatness of Ehealt, even for those who are still skeptical of this
Yes, all will clear up next week - this project can be grand, I hope that it will be so. Medicine is large segment - in combination with blockchain technology this can give revolutionary results.
I'm gonna be one of the firsts to try the EHealth brand-new services. I waited for too long for such a company to ever come up online

that's what's great about this new wave of ICO's . new companies can try different approaches.

But they do need a lot of people / network to be succesfull, and with lots of competition it means ICO's are trying to pull in the same people

Yup, only the strong ones will survive and I think this project is the one to bet on!

I see there are a lot of health project popping out but they are not as close as this one by comparing team and project functionalities. This is a fact.
jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 2
February 01, 2018, 01:14:05 AM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.
Yeah, but even before the ico it's important that everything goes smooth as planned. And after the ico as well. But the ico stage is one of the most crucial ones, here you are right
Let's look at things realistically. Not is what is not important stages in the development of the project! All stages are very important! Whether it's ICO, the marketing, the conclusion of preliminary agreements, symposiums, the design of future field activities, etc.


i don't share your opinion. theres a common phrase "first things first" and so it is with this project it is too large to do all at once
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 107
February 01, 2018, 12:21:55 AM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.
Yeah, but even before the ico it's important that everything goes smooth as planned. And after the ico as well. But the ico stage is one of the most crucial ones, here you are right
Let's look at things realistically. Not is what is not important stages in the development of the project! All stages are very important! Whether it's ICO, the marketing, the conclusion of preliminary agreements, symposiums, the design of future field activities, etc.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 261
January 31, 2018, 10:55:55 PM
It might be very cool if Ehealth would partner up with Google or Apple and store all of that health data from those smartwatches and other IOT devices .

I second the idea too. Wearable accessories that will do better than the current band of smart watches. As we all know, early detection is the key in health care.


That is a smart idea! Big companies invested in wearable technologies would be very much interested with this project.

If ehealth does not raise millions and have a beta product I think those companies will probably start their own. They already have the resources, they will probably research the market first before leaping out
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 101
January 31, 2018, 10:24:08 PM
WhitePaper will be a watershed in this ICO, it will show us what is left to understand, and understand the complexity of the project and the need to extend its roadmap. I believe that after the WPP we will really understand the greatness of Ehealt, even for those who are still skeptical of this
Yes, all will clear up next week - this project can be grand, I hope that it will be so. Medicine is large segment - in combination with blockchain technology this can give revolutionary results.
I'm gonna be one of the firsts to try the EHealth brand-new services. I waited for too long for such a company to ever come up online

that's what's great about this new wave of ICO's . new companies can try different approaches.

But they do need a lot of people / network to be succesfull, and with lots of competition it means ICO's are trying to pull in the same people

Yup, only the strong ones will survive and I think this project is the one to bet on!
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 250
CurioInvest [IEO Live]
January 31, 2018, 05:16:16 PM
I think 2025 is a long time in cryptoworld but it shows me that the devs of ehealth is serious and made their gameplan, they are trusting their project and thinking that they can raise a good amount of money which we can use at least 2025.  So I'm very curious about this project.  It can be a milestone in the blockchain industry that shows some projects can take long time to happen but still brings good returns.
You are absolutely right! A very long time, great risks for investors, but take a look at the bitcoin, how did it go? How much time has passed since its inception? And now very many bite their elbows looking at the price tag! Although some 6 years ago it could be bought for pennies! This project is going to do a very good job! And if he realizes all his plans, the price of coins will soar!
I think if you trust the developers you will not have a problem with holding their tokens. I think their large whitepaper showed us that they are serious about it.
That's like an avalanche - if the whales of the market feel fine, all of the rest who know the topic are also fine. I hope to be among them)
Bitcoin is the first crypto currency, here things are a little different - its course depends on many factors, the main one is capitalization and crypto news. But for eHealth First team what would achieve success - will need to hard work!

But to be fair at least we can say that, with that whitepaper, they are a dedicated team to their purpose. hopefully they will increase marketing side in the near future.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
January 31, 2018, 04:46:33 PM
I think 2025 is a long time in cryptoworld but it shows me that the devs of ehealth is serious and made their gameplan, they are trusting their project and thinking that they can raise a good amount of money which we can use at least 2025.  So I'm very curious about this project.  It can be a milestone in the blockchain industry that shows some projects can take long time to happen but still brings good returns.
You are absolutely right! A very long time, great risks for investors, but take a look at the bitcoin, how did it go? How much time has passed since its inception? And now very many bite their elbows looking at the price tag! Although some 6 years ago it could be bought for pennies! This project is going to do a very good job! And if he realizes all his plans, the price of coins will soar!
I think if you trust the developers you will not have a problem with holding their tokens. I think their large whitepaper showed us that they are serious about it.
That's like an avalanche - if the whales of the market feel fine, all of the rest who know the topic are also fine. I hope to be among them)
Bitcoin is the first crypto currency, here things are a little different - its course depends on many factors, the main one is capitalization and crypto news. But for eHealth First team what would achieve success - will need to hard work!
Jump to: