Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 423. (Read 97848 times)

member
Activity: 349
Merit: 12
January 31, 2018, 04:37:10 PM
I think 2025 is a long time in cryptoworld but it shows me that the devs of ehealth is serious and made their gameplan, they are trusting their project and thinking that they can raise a good amount of money which we can use at least 2025.  So I'm very curious about this project.  It can be a milestone in the blockchain industry that shows some projects can take long time to happen but still brings good returns.
You are absolutely right! A very long time, great risks for investors, but take a look at the bitcoin, how did it go? How much time has passed since its inception? And now very many bite their elbows looking at the price tag! Although some 6 years ago it could be bought for pennies! This project is going to do a very good job! And if he realizes all his plans, the price of coins will soar!
I think if you trust the developers you will not have a problem with holding their tokens. I think their large whitepaper showed us that they are serious about it.
That's like an avalanche - if the whales of the market feel fine, all of the rest who know the topic are also fine. I hope to be among them)
We are use to short time project but in the research sector projects use to be longer like this one. As more research projects arise in the blockchain this type of deadlines will become more common.

I totally agree with you. I think this project will be a colossal one because it is based on people's needs. And why does everyone need today? "Health". And by that, say eHealth.
Indeed many risks, but I think they deserve their assumption because it will be one of the projects that will revolutionize the world when it is completed.
newbie
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
January 31, 2018, 04:26:43 PM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.
Yeah, but even before the ico it's important that everything goes smooth as planned. And after the ico as well. But the ico stage is one of the most crucial ones, here you are right
the team is very valid and competent, the timeline is really long but the project will surely succeed if all the steps will be respected and the investors will give it confidence, i like this new approach, this new vision of medicine/prevention more accessible to all

Yeah it is definitely one of the newest. It is very interesting to see how everything is going with such a complex project.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
January 31, 2018, 04:08:30 PM
I think 2025 is a long time in cryptoworld but it shows me that the devs of ehealth is serious and made their gameplan, they are trusting their project and thinking that they can raise a good amount of money which we can use at least 2025.  So I'm very curious about this project.  It can be a milestone in the blockchain industry that shows some projects can take long time to happen but still brings good returns.
You are absolutely right! A very long time, great risks for investors, but take a look at the bitcoin, how did it go? How much time has passed since its inception? And now very many bite their elbows looking at the price tag! Although some 6 years ago it could be bought for pennies! This project is going to do a very good job! And if he realizes all his plans, the price of coins will soar!
I think if you trust the developers you will not have a problem with holding their tokens. I think their large whitepaper showed us that they are serious about it.
That's like an avalanche - if the whales of the market feel fine, all of the rest who know the topic are also fine. I hope to be among them)
We are use to short time project but in the research sector projects use to be longer like this one. As more research projects arise in the blockchain this type of deadlines will become more common.
full member
Activity: 938
Merit: 159
January 31, 2018, 03:59:14 PM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.
Yeah, but even before the ico it's important that everything goes smooth as planned. And after the ico as well. But the ico stage is one of the most crucial ones, here you are right
the team is very valid and competent, the timeline is really long but the project will surely succeed if all the steps will be respected and the investors will give it confidence, i like this new approach, this new vision of medicine/prevention more accessible to all
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
January 31, 2018, 03:38:29 PM
I think 2025 is a long time in cryptoworld but it shows me that the devs of ehealth is serious and made their gameplan, they are trusting their project and thinking that they can raise a good amount of money which we can use at least 2025.  So I'm very curious about this project.  It can be a milestone in the blockchain industry that shows some projects can take long time to happen but still brings good returns.
You are absolutely right! A very long time, great risks for investors, but take a look at the bitcoin, how did it go? How much time has passed since its inception? And now very many bite their elbows looking at the price tag! Although some 6 years ago it could be bought for pennies! This project is going to do a very good job! And if he realizes all his plans, the price of coins will soar!
I think if you trust the developers you will not have a problem with holding their tokens. I think their large whitepaper showed us that they are serious about it.
That's like an avalanche - if the whales of the market feel fine, all of the rest who know the topic are also fine. I hope to be among them)
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 22
The Future of Sports is Fan Controlled
January 31, 2018, 03:34:20 PM
I think 2025 is a long time in cryptoworld but it shows me that the devs of ehealth is serious and made their gameplan, they are trusting their project and thinking that they can raise a good amount of money which we can use at least 2025.  So I'm very curious about this project.  It can be a milestone in the blockchain industry that shows some projects can take long time to happen but still brings good returns.
You are absolutely right! A very long time, great risks for investors, but take a look at the bitcoin, how did it go? How much time has passed since its inception? And now very many bite their elbows looking at the price tag! Although some 6 years ago it could be bought for pennies! This project is going to do a very good job! And if he realizes all his plans, the price of coins will soar!
I think if you trust the developers you will not have a problem with holding their tokens. I think their large whitepaper showed us that they are serious about it.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 4
January 31, 2018, 03:25:29 PM
I think 2025 is a long time in cryptoworld but it shows me that the devs of ehealth is serious and made their gameplan, they are trusting their project and thinking that they can raise a good amount of money which we can use at least 2025.  So I'm very curious about this project.  It can be a milestone in the blockchain industry that shows some projects can take long time to happen but still brings good returns.
You are absolutely right! A very long time, great risks for investors, but take a look at the bitcoin, how did it go? How much time has passed since its inception? And now very many bite their elbows looking at the price tag! Although some 6 years ago it could be bought for pennies! This project is going to do a very good job! And if he realizes all his plans, the price of coins will soar!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Become Part of the Mining Family
January 31, 2018, 03:21:17 PM
Storing data on the blockchain system is not new now. There are many projects already regarding this but why do we have to keep this data so secret.!  I would like to know more details regarding this.
It's because a patient doesn't want his health data stored on an open blockchain. If your employer and insurance companies know your data this could lead to some problems.

I believe with servers we have currently, healthcare data is more fragile and hackable than what blockchain technology has to offer. I believe your healthcare data is more save with blockchain
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
January 31, 2018, 03:14:45 PM
Storing data on the blockchain system is not new now. There are many projects already regarding this but why do we have to keep this data so secret.!  I would like to know more details regarding this.
It's because a patient doesn't want his health data stored on an open blockchain. If your employer and insurance companies know your data this could lead to some problems.

They are personal data so they are private. From there, each one is free to make them public or not.
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 22
The Future of Sports is Fan Controlled
January 31, 2018, 02:57:35 PM
Storing data on the blockchain system is not new now. There are many projects already regarding this but why do we have to keep this data so secret.!  I would like to know more details regarding this.
It's because a patient doesn't want his health data stored on an open blockchain. If your employer and insurance companies know your data this could lead to some problems.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
January 31, 2018, 02:42:53 PM
It might be very cool if Ehealth would partner up with Google or Apple and store all of that health data from those smartwatches and other IOT devices .

I second the idea too. Wearable accessories that will do better than the current band of smart watches. As we all know, early detection is the key in health care.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 263
January 31, 2018, 02:26:19 PM
It might be very cool if Ehealth would partner up with Google or Apple and store all of that health data from those smartwatches and other IOT devices .
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
January 31, 2018, 02:22:43 PM
Any possibility of future integration to existing systems in medicine? Would it be interesting to share a database fully populated and supplemented by other Professionals, are often simultaneous evaluations in different Professionals?
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
January 31, 2018, 02:09:29 PM
My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

Why would you Google search when you can visit the library? You know books are written by experts whereas websites can be published by anybody and are usually second opinion too.

Think of all the people in third world countries who might be able to eventually get easy access to the internet, but can't afford or don't have a nearby doctor.

jep, but the IT-platform is for all people and not only for the third world countries.  Roll Eyes

For that reason alone is ehealth tenable. This project will or at least aims at democratising access to healthcare and early diagnosis. This is a lot.
If it's something seroius probably the "online profesional" would recomend you to go to a hospital to be check. It is not a matter of trust but sometimes to make a correct diagnosis you have to do tests that can not be done online.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
January 31, 2018, 01:51:43 PM
My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?

Why would you Google search when you can visit the library? You know books are written by experts whereas websites can be published by anybody and are usually second opinion too.

Think of all the people in third world countries who might be able to eventually get easy access to the internet, but can't afford or don't have a nearby doctor.

jep, but the IT-platform is for all people and not only for the third world countries.  Roll Eyes

For that reason alone is ehealth tenable. This project will or at least aims at democratising access to healthcare and early diagnosis. This is a lot.
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 37
January 31, 2018, 01:27:55 PM
Storing data on the blockchain system is not new now. There are many projects already regarding this but why do we have to keep this data so secret.!  I would like to know more details regarding this.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
January 31, 2018, 12:58:13 PM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.
Yeah, but even before the ico it's important that everything goes smooth as planned. And after the ico as well. But the ico stage is one of the most crucial ones, here you are right
jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 2
January 31, 2018, 12:57:12 PM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.


when it comes to a min invest that high at current courses people will read the white paper. for small investors it might be a huge amount. and people who plan to invest a real BIG amount read it anyway or have advisors to read paper through - therefore they pay them.

and yeah everything depends on the outcome of the ico. if the ico is going well (I hope so - im not a whale) the pavement is done and a skyscraper will be built up on it!
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
January 31, 2018, 11:53:27 AM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

Take the bitter with the sweet.

I think the timeline is too long but still, i think it is way better than the other projects so i can take the chance.

Yes, but a too long timeline can easily lead to a project that will never finish.
Yes, but if the team have a good plan and stick to it also the money needed are raised time is not a problem.
The only question is whether they fulfill all their obligations at each stage of the roadmap. If so, no matter how long is the project - everybody will be satisfied with the company's activity.
Everything will depend of ICO outcome. The project is big and not simple - I didn't get to read all the whitepaper. Let's hope that large investors who are able to fully study all the aspects of the project will attract the interest.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 112
January 31, 2018, 11:40:06 AM
Its a very challenging project, if somebody could pull this off is the team behind it. Is the main reason i have great expectations.

Yeah, the idea is bold but the timeline is too long.

it's only too long in the crypto space. here we all expect 1000% every month for projects. in the real world it takes decades to grow something like this.

This is very true. I think the roadmap and timeline are realistic given the scope of the project but crypto investors consist of short term traders mostly so this is going to be a problem. I can foresee token holders demanding faster progress and such things.

It is something crypto investors didn't face before.

Great project with a long timetable. Everything in here happens so fast, i really wonder the results of the ico.


Yes, I agree that until know there was nothing similar with such a long roadmap. But as the use of blockchain get into more complex projects it was just a matter of time until there will be projects which take more time to build up. If you look into some of the biggest projects in the last years like Tesla, SpaceX etc. They all took years to get to a point where people could say they have a success, starting from the bottom.

Actually, the current crypto market is not realistic.

Projects with 6 months roi or some development happen in 3 months. If ehealth had a success, it brings the more realistic and bigger project to the market.

I think lots of serious projects don't start an ico because of this reasons. Maybe some are watching ehealth for start theirs.

Yep, that's what I am thinking. Projects will get more and more complex over time, and with it it takes also more time to build them up. At some point this will get regular business in crypto market probably.
Jump to: