Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 439. (Read 97848 times)

full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
January 27, 2018, 09:22:29 AM
There was a lot of speculation about the attitude of the EHealth team to the project, so we could observe, worked quietly and brought the promised one on time, I hope they act in the same way in the next steps, even though there are no answers for everything in every moment, they will be working on what they will present to us soon. Congratulations to the Team
member
Activity: 286
Merit: 10
January 27, 2018, 08:23:55 AM
It was like i said several pages before: they didnt posted any update because they were hard at work with the WP. Good job guys!

I was thinking the same but now they exaggerated a little bit.

I like saying people check whitepaper for your question but now what will i say Cheesy

Check page 213 for your answer. Still, it was a very big project and now whitepaper is representing its depth.
I don't know who to be to read 300 pages in 1 day... It is not necessary so categorically to speak about people... The project is interesting to many, so so many questions.


Pretty much sure many are interested in viewing the whitepaper.  Credit to the people behind the unique project which helps everyone understand more about health issues.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1416
January 27, 2018, 07:54:08 AM
For the moment i can say the wp is may able to convince more private investors. I don't understand everything but really eager to see the response for this phase of the sale
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
January 27, 2018, 07:39:52 AM
I'm going to be completely  honest here guys..... I didn't read the whole white paper and I don't think I ever will. I don't know if I am falling into their plan for creating a 289 pg. whitepaper but, I am inclined to believe these guys are legit. What is in those pages, I will never know. Probably a challenge to write a whitepaper that long but even more challenging would be to write the one pager that represents it.

Well i think most of us wont read the whole whitepaper even if we will invest in the ICO but it good to have somewhere to look up some facts if you will need some answers.
To be honest, i will wait for some youtube review of the whitepaper and go trough that one.
Indeed, it's too big to be a whitepaper. It's OK to look for some information in particular but it is too long to read it.
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
January 27, 2018, 05:31:40 AM
I'm going to be completely  honest here guys..... I didn't read the whole white paper and I don't think I ever will. I don't know if I am falling into their plan for creating a 289 pg. whitepaper but, I am inclined to believe these guys are legit. What is in those pages, I will never know. Probably a challenge to write a whitepaper that long but even more challenging would be to write the one pager that represents it.

Well i think most of us wont read the whole whitepaper even if we will invest in the ICO but it good to have somewhere to look up some facts if you will need some answers.
To be honest, i will wait for some youtube review of the whitepaper and go trough that one.
sr. member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 279
My blockchain can beat up your blockchain
January 27, 2018, 05:25:50 AM
I'm going to be completely  honest here guys..... I didn't read the whole white paper and I don't think I ever will. I don't know if I am falling into their plan for creating a 289 pg. whitepaper but, I am inclined to believe these guys are legit. What is in those pages, I will never know. Probably a challenge to write a whitepaper that long but even more challenging would be to write the one pager that represents it.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
January 27, 2018, 05:19:52 AM
Hi! Have you thought about lowering the minimum investment?

yeah thats really a little high but anyway the ico is soon in comparison with the whole project duration so you can buy tokens on an exchange

Since its suppose to be private presale with 50-70 % discount, i think the minimum investment is still low with 0.5 BTC. I am sure ICO will have much lower minimum like we are used to with other projects.

0.5 BTC is a lot if we are talking about the common investors, deep pocket investors have no problem throwing some on to it, the risk is a little high since we are talking about a very complex project.

Compared with many other ICOs which demand a much higher minimum contribution during their presale it's still a quite modest amount.


I think the minimum invest is ok. there will be people selling on exchanges soon and then I will buy mine

A bit high to me I would have to wait to have some tokens.
jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 2
January 27, 2018, 04:49:14 AM
Hi! Have you thought about lowering the minimum investment?

yeah thats really a little high but anyway the ico is soon in comparison with the whole project duration so you can buy tokens on an exchange

Since its suppose to be private presale with 50-70 % discount, i think the minimum investment is still low with 0.5 BTC. I am sure ICO will have much lower minimum like we are used to with other projects.

0.5 BTC is a lot if we are talking about the common investors, deep pocket investors have no problem throwing some on to it, the risk is a little high since we are talking about a very complex project.

Compared with many other ICOs which demand a much higher minimum contribution during their presale it's still a quite modest amount.


I think the minimum invest is ok. there will be people selling on exchanges soon and then I will buy mine
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
January 27, 2018, 04:46:31 AM
Hi! Have you thought about lowering the minimum investment?

yeah thats really a little high but anyway the ico is soon in comparison with the whole project duration so you can buy tokens on an exchange

Since its suppose to be private presale with 50-70 % discount, i think the minimum investment is still low with 0.5 BTC. I am sure ICO will have much lower minimum like we are used to with other projects.

0.5 BTC is a lot if we are talking about the common investors, deep pocket investors have no problem throwing some on to it, the risk is a little high since we are talking about a very complex project.

Compared with many other ICOs which demand a much higher minimum contribution during their presale it's still a quite modest amount.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1003
January 27, 2018, 04:34:56 AM
Hi! Have you thought about lowering the minimum investment?

yeah thats really a little high but anyway the ico is soon in comparison with the whole project duration so you can buy tokens on an exchange

Since its suppose to be private presale with 50-70 % discount, i think the minimum investment is still low with 0.5 BTC. I am sure ICO will have much lower minimum like we are used to with other projects.

0.5 BTC is a lot if we are talking about the common investors, deep pocket investors have no problem throwing some on to it, the risk is a little high since we are talking about a very complex project.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 102
January 27, 2018, 04:21:19 AM
Hi! Have you thought about lowering the minimum investment?

yeah thats really a little high but anyway the ico is soon in comparison with the whole project duration so you can buy tokens on an exchange

Since its suppose to be private presale with 50-70 % discount, i think the minimum investment is still low with 0.5 BTC. I am sure ICO will have much lower minimum like we are used to with other projects.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
January 27, 2018, 04:07:12 AM
Hi! Have you thought about lowering the minimum investment?

yeah thats really a little high but anyway the ico is soon in comparison with the whole project duration so you can buy tokens on an exchange
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1416
January 27, 2018, 03:34:41 AM
Whitepaper has an index, use it to find the part you are more intrested in. It works also as a link.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 112
January 27, 2018, 03:25:42 AM
It was like i said several pages before: they didnt posted any update because they were hard at work with the WP. Good job guys!

I was thinking the same but now they exaggerated a little bit.

I like saying people check whitepaper for your question but now what will i say Cheesy

Check page 213 for your answer. Still, it was a very big project and now whitepaper is representing its depth.

To me that's a good thing. It really shows the devs have really though this through. Too bad it's gonna take so long.

I am not going to read it. It is like a book and i prefer reading more intresting thing. I saw there is a shorter thing, i would go for it.

I always suggest people to read whitepaper making an investment decision but i wasn't talking about 280 pages whitepaper.

If they are translating this, translators probably ask for a whole btc or similar Cheesy


Well it would be good to have a short version too, that's true. But anyways as I said some pages before, I don't think you need to read everything, but most likely the main stuff and maybe some stuff which brings in questions for you to clarify these.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
January 27, 2018, 03:07:40 AM
It was like i said several pages before: they didnt posted any update because they were hard at work with the WP. Good job guys!

I was thinking the same but now they exaggerated a little bit.

I like saying people check whitepaper for your question but now what will i say Cheesy

Check page 213 for your answer. Still, it was a very big project and now whitepaper is representing its depth.

To me that's a good thing. It really shows the devs have really though this through. Too bad it's gonna take so long.

I am not going to read it. It is like a book and i prefer reading more intresting thing. I saw there is a shorter thing, i would go for it.

I always suggest people to read whitepaper making an investment decision but i wasn't talking about 280 pages whitepaper.

If they are translating this, translators probably ask for a whole btc or similar Cheesy
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
January 27, 2018, 02:34:18 AM
It was like i said several pages before: they didnt posted any update because they were hard at work with the WP. Good job guys!

I was thinking the same but now they exaggerated a little bit.

I like saying people check whitepaper for your question but now what will i say Cheesy

Check page 213 for your answer. Still, it was a very big project and now whitepaper is representing its depth.

To me that's a good thing. It really shows the devs have really though this through. Too bad it's gonna take so long.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 107
January 27, 2018, 02:27:37 AM
It was like i said several pages before: they didnt posted any update because they were hard at work with the WP. Good job guys!

I was thinking the same but now they exaggerated a little bit.

I like saying people check whitepaper for your question but now what will i say Cheesy

Check page 213 for your answer. Still, it was a very big project and now whitepaper is representing its depth.
I don't know who to be to read 300 pages in 1 day... It is not necessary so categorically to speak about people... The project is interesting to many, so so many questions.
member
Activity: 229
Merit: 10
January 27, 2018, 02:12:38 AM
Hi! Have you thought about lowering the minimum investment?
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
January 27, 2018, 02:01:54 AM
It was like i said several pages before: they didnt posted any update because they were hard at work with the WP. Good job guys!

I was thinking the same but now they exaggerated a little bit.

I like saying people check whitepaper for your question but now what will i say Cheesy

Check page 213 for your answer. Still, it was a very big project and now whitepaper is representing its depth.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
January 27, 2018, 01:18:32 AM
It was like i said several pages before: they didnt posted any update because they were hard at work with the WP. Good job guys!
Jump to: