Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] «Envion» Most Profitable Self-Expanding Crypto Infrastructure - page 37. (Read 125669 times)

copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 17
I need to transfer ETH inside ENV original wallet to transfer them on my MEW? How to do that?

If you received letter with PIN code from Envion you should login to Envion and get your wallet Private Key.
Remember: never share your Private Key to anyone!
After you stored safely Private Key you can send EVN tokens via MyEtherWallet (MEW).
sr. member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 269
I need to transfer ETH inside ENV original wallet to transfer them on my MEW? How to do that?
i think you should contact with envion team member
here is the telegrame link you can join and ask your question there
you will get you answer hopefully. best of luck 
https://t.me/Envion
member
Activity: 164
Merit: 10
I need to transfer ETH inside ENV original wallet to transfer them on my MEW? How to do that?
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1166
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I checked my blockfolio a week ago. Evn was 100% +. But now it's back to 0.15. What's going on. I thought the founders won

Markets behave like markets behave. Sometimes they pump after good news and dump right after. Some people are selling now to make more profits with other markets because it could take time to get this thing started.
newbie
Activity: 110
Merit: 0
I checked my blockfolio a week ago. Evn was 100% +. But now it's back to 0.15. What's going on. I thought the founders won
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1005
it is realy sad that this project ended like this , i had good hopes for it while ico was running , but after ico they where in trouble immedietly with sending the tokens and their difficult KYC ,

that was the moment to see that this project would fail
full member
Activity: 504
Merit: 128
I do not want to read everything back if this message has already been posted here. But after some google work, I came out on a court website with this message. Read it below.



Scandal at Envion AG
22.06.2018 | Istvan Cocron
Deadline to respond expires without success – CLLB Rechtsanwälte prepare first lawsuits against Envion AG and other responsible persons

Berlin, Munich, 19.06.2018

As already reported in the press, the Executive Board of Envion AG, Matthias Woestmann, commissioned forensic IT experts Blockchain Intelligence Group (BIG), to investigate the circumstances surrounding the 40 million extra tokens produced. According to the board of Envion AG, the allegations have now been confirmed technically.
 . . .


https://www.cllb.de/blockchaincryptocurrencies/scandal-at-envion-ag/

This "40 million tokens" issue was discussed and explained a number of times here.
For details please read:
https://envion-founders.org/ceo-woestmann-silently-backtracks-40-million-extra-tokens-claim-against-envion-founders/




I already knew the first part of the text, but I mean the last part of the text. That envion does not respond to death lines of the CLLB to respond. About solving the problem between the investors who have been scammed.
if the envion team will not going to make this project real then its a scam
but if envion team will start work on the project and make a good platform for its community then its good
i have seen in pictures that envion already purchased mining units and they are using them for mine crypto
if yes then where is the mined crypto and what envion do to that mined crypto
member
Activity: 223
Merit: 17
I do not want to read everything back if this message has already been posted here. But after some google work, I came out on a court website with this message. Read it below.



Scandal at Envion AG
22.06.2018 | Istvan Cocron
Deadline to respond expires without success – CLLB Rechtsanwälte prepare first lawsuits against Envion AG and other responsible persons

Berlin, Munich, 19.06.2018

As already reported in the press, the Executive Board of Envion AG, Matthias Woestmann, commissioned forensic IT experts Blockchain Intelligence Group (BIG), to investigate the circumstances surrounding the 40 million extra tokens produced. According to the board of Envion AG, the allegations have now been confirmed technically.
 . . .


https://www.cllb.de/blockchaincryptocurrencies/scandal-at-envion-ag/

This "40 million tokens" issue was discussed and explained a number of times here.
For details please read:
https://envion-founders.org/ceo-woestmann-silently-backtracks-40-million-extra-tokens-claim-against-envion-founders/




I already knew the first part of the text, but I mean the last part of the text. That envion does not respond to death lines of the CLLB to respond. About solving the problem between the investors who have been scammed.
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 17
I do not want to read everything back if this message has already been posted here. But after some google work, I came out on a court website with this message. Read it below.



Scandal at Envion AG
22.06.2018 | Istvan Cocron
Deadline to respond expires without success – CLLB Rechtsanwälte prepare first lawsuits against Envion AG and other responsible persons

Berlin, Munich, 19.06.2018

As already reported in the press, the Executive Board of Envion AG, Matthias Woestmann, commissioned forensic IT experts Blockchain Intelligence Group (BIG), to investigate the circumstances surrounding the 40 million extra tokens produced. According to the board of Envion AG, the allegations have now been confirmed technically.
 . . .


https://www.cllb.de/blockchaincryptocurrencies/scandal-at-envion-ag/

This "40 million tokens" issue was discussed and explained a number of times here.
For details please read:
https://envion-founders.org/ceo-woestmann-silently-backtracks-40-million-extra-tokens-claim-against-envion-founders/

member
Activity: 223
Merit: 17
I do not want to read everything back if this message has already been posted here. But after some google work, I came out on a court website with this message. Read it below.



Scandal at Envion AG
22.06.2018 | Istvan Cocron
Deadline to respond expires without success – CLLB Rechtsanwälte prepare first lawsuits against Envion AG and other responsible persons

Berlin, Munich, 19.06.2018

As already reported in the press, the Executive Board of Envion AG, Matthias Woestmann, commissioned forensic IT experts Blockchain Intelligence Group (BIG), to investigate the circumstances surrounding the 40 million extra tokens produced. According to the board of Envion AG, the allegations have now been confirmed technically.

At the end of February 2018, the Envion AG Executive Board became aware that, in addition to the 100 million EVN tokens planned in the white paper, around 40 million additional „illegal“ tokens were generated without informing investors. Of these, apparently in excess of 20 million tokens were sold on crypto trading exchanges and thereby converted to cash. Investors have now informed CLLB that they would not have acquired EVN, if they had known that „behind their backs“ another 40 million tokens were being produced, which had the effect of diluting the market value of EVN tokens.

Now a recent and extensive technical analysis of the ICO, performed by experts from BIG in Canada, is available. The allegations of the investors have been confirmed by BIG.

In recent days and weeks, a large number of investors affected by the Envion scandal have reported to CLLB Rechtsanwälte, a Munich and Berlin-based law firm, to have their claims for compensation assessed against Envion AG and the persons responsible there.

In its letter of 04.06.2018, CLLB requested on behalf of its clients that Envion AG, among other things, pay back the capital supplied by investors to Envion AG, incrementally, against return of the received EVN tokens.

Envion AG was set a deadline of Friday 15.06.2018 to respond.

„So far we have not received any response to our letter of formal notice, despite the deadline,“ explains CLLB. Therefore, we will now, according to the mandate of our clients, prepare payment claims against Envion AG and other persons in charge,“ continues CLLB.

Since the allegations concerning the EVN token’s infringement of the prospectus have been publicly admitted by Envion AG management, CLLB cannot understand why the company declines to respond to legal letters from its investors, explains Attorney at Law István Cocron, of the law firm CLLB.

Once again CLLB contacted the Executive Board of Envion AG, Matthias Wöstmann, on behalf of a number of its investors in a letter dated today, 19.06.2018, this time at his residential address in Berlin.

At the same time, CLLB is currently evaluating all documents from the Telegram groups of EVN investors and other publicly available posts and reports in order to further complete the claim that is already in progress. If in the future Envion AG refuses to deal with its investors out of court, corresponding lawsuits seem inevitable in order to clarify the already existing scandal.

Insofar as ENVION AG and any other responsible parties are obliged to pay damages by the presiding court, they must also reimburse fully the legal fees and court costs incurred by the investors, the CLLB Rechtsanwälte team explained further.

Investors in Envion should therefore check whether they may also be entitled to compensation. The law firm CLLB Rechtsanwälte is also grateful for all information and documents that can be used for further clarification of the matter.


 https://www.cllb.de/blockchaincryptocurrencies/scandal-at-envion-ag/
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 17
Update from Envion founders blog July 1, 2018

Sweeping judgement from Berlin court restricts envion AG’s CEO Matthias Woestmann from any decisions without Founders’ approval, finds Thomas van Aubel and Jutta von Falkenhausen’s actions “immoral and especially reprehensible”

July 11, 2018

July 10, 2018. BERLIN — Matthias Woestmann, CEO of Swiss crypto-mining company envion AG, has been hobbled by a Berlin court’s sweeping judgement preventing him from making business decisions without approval from the company’s founders.  The decision stems from a June 21st hearing for an injunction won by the founders’ company Trado GmbH against majority shareholders Quadrat Capital GmbH, led by Woestmann, and Sycamore GmbH, led by co-CEOs Thomas van Aubel and Jutta Freifrau von Falkenhausen.  The court further confirmed the dilution of the founders’ majority ownership resulting from a capital raise executed by Woestmann was an illegal breach of contract, calling van Aubel and von Falkenhausen’s complicity both “immoral” and “especially reprehensible.”

“This judgement is an important victory for the founders as well as for envion’s investors,” says Michael Luckow who has publicly represented Trado and the founding team’s interests since the injunction was filed in early May.  “Anyone who thinks they can do business with envion while Woestmann is CEO needs to be aware of the risk that no deals will be valid unless the founders have given our prior approval.”

Berlin’s District Court judges ruled that Woestmann acted with “malicious intent” when he broke a contract between his company Quadrat Capital and Trado signed at the time of the envion’s founding.  Envion went on to raise $100-million-dollars in an Initial Coin Offering (ICO).  The agreement stipulated that Woestmann’s Quadrat would hold shares owned by the founders’ company Trado representing 81% ownership of the company and explicitly forbade any actions threatening their majority ownership or voting rights.  Woestmann held the remaining 19% and was to return the founders’ shares before the end of the ICO in January 2018.

Woestmann instead carried out an illegal capital increase without the founders’ knowledge which diluted their ownership down to a 31% minority share.  New shares created via the capital increase were given to Sycamore GmbH, a company owned by Woestmann’s longtime friend Thomas van Aubel and his wife Jutta Freifrau von Falkenhausen. The judges ruled that van Aubel and von Falkenhausen “knowing acted illegally by receiving shares” and share responsibility for the serious consequences to the founders.

In addition to ruling that Woestmann committed a “clear breach of duty” against the founders, the judges rejected the justification Woestmann presented to the court in his defense.  His false claim that the founders illegitimately created extra tokens was not accepted by the three-judge-panel.  The judgment published by the court states that the existing number of tokens corresponds to the specifications of the investor prospectus, thereby confirming the founders account of the matter.

The judge’s decision invalidates Woestmann’s entire public campaign of false accusations aimed discrediting the founders which he spread via newsletters, media interviews, and a hastily launched website.  The “40-million token fairy tale”—as it’s known to envion’s investors—was meant to justify the capital increase and undermine the founders’ credibility, but now represents a further liability for making false statements about the founders.

The judgement states that Woestmann violated his contractual obligations to the founders by increasing the company shares “without consent” from the founders, damaging the interests of the company and its investors with a share price well-below a valuation pertinent to envion’s ICO success. “The capital increase weakened the economic content of their shares.  This follows from the fact that they lost their majority stake and with it the majority required by section 12 of envion AG’s by-laws to make decisions [for the company].”

A further breach of contract was established as a consequence of Woestmann’s failure to inform or obtain approval from the founders for his capital raise.  “The breach of contract is not justified because Woestmann believes the capital increase was carried out in the interests of creditors and investors and that the plaintiff (founders) allegedly withheld the proceeds from the ICO without reason . . . .  Irrespective of the fact that defendant  #1 (Woestmann’s Quadrat Capital GmbH) has not credibly established business-damaging behavior on behalf of the plaintiff (founders), a capital increase without prior notice and behind the back of the plaintiff is not justified,” states the opinion of the court. The court therefore grants the founders “a right to injunction against all debits or other activities [which] could have an economic impact on the plaintiff’s shares held in trust.”

The court issued a stinging rebuke to Woestmann’s friend Thomas van Aubel and wife, Jutta von Falkenhausen, who are now the illegitimate majority shareholders through their company Sycamore GmbH.  The judgement determined that Van Aubel knew the capital increase was unlawful, stating, “This was obvious.”  He and von Falkenhausen “deliberately inflicted damage in a manner contrary to common decency” by acquiring the illegal shares.

“The defendant caused this damage in an immoral manner.  Behavior that violates the sense of decency of all proper and just thinkers in terms of content and overall character is objectively immoral, i.e. incompatible with the fundamental values of the legal and moral order.  There is especially reprehensible behavior [already determined by the court, in which Sycamore] entered into a legal transaction violating clear contractual provisions between the plaintiff (founders) and the defendant (Woestmann/Quadrat Capital) and thus, in cooperation with the defendant, intentionally harmed the plaintiff.”

Envion co-founder Michael Luckow explains, “We understand the assessment made by the court to be the basis of a claim for damages against both Woestmann and van Aubel for the harm to investors as well as envion’s founders.  The court has clearly stated that we have suffered damages resulting from their actions.”
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
First of all I will appreciate the efforts to being the news on the table for everyone to keep himself update. Secondly, I don't understand what is to be happy as token holder for when it is referring everything between the two parties. There is no talk about investors and shouldn't be but why founders have sealed their lips continuously. They don't need of community anymore after winning in court.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 92
I think, very good team and interesting project..



Perfect summarry for Envion ICO!!!

I think you should buy all ENV tokens available @Ropique if you are such a supporter. Or maybe you are just a spammer?
member
Activity: 223
Merit: 17
I think, very good team and interesting project..

newbie
Activity: 110
Merit: 0
I don't believe that anyone would change to those monopoly things. At least there's a small chance that Envion will yield some money down the line. Monopoly is such a joke.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1166
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I understand that the project has come to an end ...
I'm right?
Did any of the investors sued the team?

You understanding is wrong. All I can advice you is to keep tracking news from founders team.

Where we can read the latest news, and trusted news? Because i see so much fud around, so i want to follow only the original and trusted channels. They have maybe instagram or some social like that?
I keep my tokens, never sell in loss Wink

If you trust the envion, you could always lower your buy in average by buying more Smiley (not a financial advice). I am waiting for the dust to settle and see how this goes.
full member
Activity: 560
Merit: 106
I understand that the project has come to an end ...
I'm right?
Did any of the investors sued the team?

You understanding is wrong. All I can advice you is to keep tracking news from founders team.

Where we can read the latest news, and trusted news? Because i see so much fud around, so i want to follow only the original and trusted channels. They have maybe instagram or some social like that?
I keep my tokens, never sell in loss Wink
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 17
I understand that the project has come to an end ...
I'm right?
Did any of the investors sued the team?

You understanding is wrong. All I can advice you is to keep tracking news from founders team.
Pages:
Jump to: