Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] MilkCoin [MLCN] - Agricultural Enterprise ICO 15.11.2017 - page 11. (Read 27689 times)

full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 107
I understand that the tokens are only intended to repurchase? Simply, I came across the fact that agricultural projects offered to purchase their products on their tokens

Do you think it makes sense to purchase a huge amount of milk for your own tokens? And what about the delivery? No, that's a bad idea.

Simply, the main offer are dividends and buyback, but not any products purchase (that is mainly for Russian backers)
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I understand that the tokens are only intended to repurchase? Simply, I came across the fact that agricultural projects offered to purchase their products on their tokens

Do you think it makes sense to purchase a huge amount of milk for your own tokens? And what about the delivery? No, that's a bad idea.

Well, yes, I have to agree with you Smiley
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
I understand that the tokens are only intended to repurchase? Simply, I came across the fact that agricultural projects offered to purchase their products on their tokens

Do you think it makes sense to purchase a huge amount of milk for your own tokens? And what about the delivery? No, that's a bad idea.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 252
IMUSIFY - Award Winning Blockchain Music Tech
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

It always seemed to me that this is not a zone of influence of the real economy, quite the contrary. After all, there are other ways to raise funds, in addition to releasing tokens

It would definitely be possible, for example venture capital, but it would still require a lot of money, and venture capital probably wouldn't be enough. also, the russian government isn't keen on investing in large scale enterprises. A crowdfunding in todays economy is the most succesful, affordable and profitable when done with an ICO.

Yes, you are right, but do not you think that the community will better take a high-tech, revolutionary project?

Actually, given how people are realising 99% of all ICO's end of getting listed for less than ICO price, they're going to want to invest in something that'll give them fast returns, even if those returns are potentially smaller. An ICO mostly benefits the company owners (devs), but these days you're going to be better off waiting for the first major sell off right after the listing. Milkcoin will most likely not experience that

I can be mistaken, but a quick return does not depend on the scope of the project, but on the team itself. How they will calculate, so all will happen.

hype is also a major factor. Have you noticed how Milkcoin is actually quite unknown? Plus, a lot of early investors will keep their coins so they can get the dividends. This combination will allow for a gradual rise in popularity, without the usual sell offs that occur next to it.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I understand that the tokens are only intended to repurchase? Simply, I came across the fact that agricultural projects offered to purchase their products on their tokens
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

It always seemed to me that this is not a zone of influence of the real economy, quite the contrary. After all, there are other ways to raise funds, in addition to releasing tokens

It would definitely be possible, for example venture capital, but it would still require a lot of money, and venture capital probably wouldn't be enough. also, the russian government isn't keen on investing in large scale enterprises. A crowdfunding in todays economy is the most succesful, affordable and profitable when done with an ICO.

Yes, you are right, but do not you think that the community will better take a high-tech, revolutionary project?

Actually, given how people are realising 99% of all ICO's end of getting listed for less than ICO price, they're going to want to invest in something that'll give them fast returns, even if those returns are potentially smaller. An ICO mostly benefits the company owners (devs), but these days you're going to be better off waiting for the first major sell off right after the listing. Milkcoin will most likely not experience that

I can be mistaken, but a quick return does not depend on the scope of the project, but on the team itself. How they will calculate, so all will happen.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

It always seemed to me that this is not a zone of influence of the real economy, quite the contrary. After all, there are other ways to raise funds, in addition to releasing tokens

It would definitely be possible, for example venture capital, but it would still require a lot of money, and venture capital probably wouldn't be enough. also, the russian government isn't keen on investing in large scale enterprises. A crowdfunding in todays economy is the most succesful, affordable and profitable when done with an ICO.

Yes, you are right, but do not you think that the community will better take a high-tech, revolutionary project?

Actually, given how people are realising 99% of all ICO's end of getting listed for less than ICO price, they're going to want to invest in something that'll give them fast returns, even if those returns are potentially smaller. An ICO mostly benefits the company owners (devs), but these days you're going to be better off waiting for the first major sell off right after the listing. Milkcoin will most likely not experience that

Yes, probably, you are right. I think that I need to study the project documentation more
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 252
IMUSIFY - Award Winning Blockchain Music Tech
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

It always seemed to me that this is not a zone of influence of the real economy, quite the contrary. After all, there are other ways to raise funds, in addition to releasing tokens

It would definitely be possible, for example venture capital, but it would still require a lot of money, and venture capital probably wouldn't be enough. also, the russian government isn't keen on investing in large scale enterprises. A crowdfunding in todays economy is the most succesful, affordable and profitable when done with an ICO.

Yes, you are right, but do not you think that the community will better take a high-tech, revolutionary project?

Actually, given how people are realising 99% of all ICO's end of getting listed for less than ICO price, they're going to want to invest in something that'll give them fast returns, even if those returns are potentially smaller. An ICO mostly benefits the company owners (devs), but these days you're going to be better off waiting for the first major sell off right after the listing. Milkcoin will most likely not experience that
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

It always seemed to me that this is not a zone of influence of the real economy, quite the contrary. After all, there are other ways to raise funds, in addition to releasing tokens

It would definitely be possible, for example venture capital, but it would still require a lot of money, and venture capital probably wouldn't be enough. also, the russian government isn't keen on investing in large scale enterprises. A crowdfunding in todays economy is the most succesful, affordable and profitable when done with an ICO.

Yes, you are right, but do not you think that the community will better take a high-tech, revolutionary project?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 252
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

It always seemed to me that this is not a zone of influence of the real economy, quite the contrary. After all, there are other ways to raise funds, in addition to releasing tokens

Well, recently in the thread said about this. Tokenization is much more convenient and profitable than bank loans. Yes, there is a certain share of risk, but the potential benefit covers everything.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 252
IMUSIFY - Award Winning Blockchain Music Tech
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

It always seemed to me that this is not a zone of influence of the real economy, quite the contrary. After all, there are other ways to raise funds, in addition to releasing tokens

It would definitely be possible, for example venture capital, but it would still require a lot of money, and venture capital probably wouldn't be enough. also, the russian government isn't keen on investing in large scale enterprises. A crowdfunding in todays economy is the most succesful, affordable and profitable when done with an ICO.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

It always seemed to me that this is not a zone of influence of the real economy, quite the contrary. After all, there are other ways to raise funds, in addition to releasing tokens
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 252
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk

Indeed, I wanted to say about it. The fact is that investment in the real economy is always more profitable, so for me this project looks very interesting
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 252
IMUSIFY - Award Winning Blockchain Music Tech
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion

I understand where you're coming from, but an ICO is nothing more than a crowdfunding where you get shares from a company in the form of tokens. Milkcoin will work in the exact same way, but even better as they're already an existing business with real revenue. Most ICO's are from platforms or dApps that aren't even in beta phase, which makes the potential ROI higher, but also the risk
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
I always thought that ICO is something high-tech. Therefore, I regard Milk Coin with some suspicion
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Is it possible to release tokens without using them in the system? That is, only to raise money for the development of the project? Forgive me for asking, I do not have much experience in ICO

Why not? Companies of the real economy often work that way. This is beneficial, given the trends of the crypto-currency market.

Given the latest trends in the fall in prices for the BTC, this may not be so profitable. But I still like the project.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
Bounty manager (https://t.me/Gudwinn)
Is it possible to release tokens without using them in the system? That is, only to raise money for the development of the project? Forgive me for asking, I do not have much experience in ICO

Why not? Companies of the real economy often work that way. This is beneficial, given the trends of the crypto-currency market.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Is it possible to release tokens without using them in the system? That is, only to raise money for the development of the project? Forgive me for asking, I do not have much experience in ICO
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 252
I noticed that not the first project in the field of agriculture is carrying out tokenization. Is it a fashion trend? It is obvious that agriculture is not the most obvious area for ICO

Yes, I also heard about several such projects. It seems to me that this excellent idea is applicable to agriculture. The banking system gives farmers loans with crazy interest rates, so it is only natural that businessmen try to find other ways of realizing their ideas. The project is simple and clear, I will follow up
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 107
It turns out that the project produces tokens solely for collecting investments?

I think that you are right, especially considering the fact that the team even specified a period of buy-back. However, this is a fairly common practice. The guys indicated the reasons for the ICO, everything is fair.
Pages:
Jump to: