[ANN][ICO] [NaPoleonX] 1st 🌟French🌟 algorithmic crypto asset manager 🚀 - page 189.

alphashotgun

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: the_donald on September 21, 2017, 12:54:29 AM

Quote from: Voltaje on September 20, 2017, 11:27:50 PM

Quote from: batako on September 20, 2017, 11:23:17 PM

Quote from: blackened515 on September 20, 2017, 07:17:16 PM

Why you chose Napoleon name for your ico ? Grin

Napoleon is a very brave and successful leader in his time, maybe that spirit is what NaPoleonX wants to bring in this era. Intelligent selection of names.

I think that is because he was a French leader, who also was a good STRATEGIST, so he could win a lot of battles, the concept of the DAFs are a set of bots used in several STRATEGIES to earn money or WIN at trading, so it's kind of fitting really, at least is what I think is the reason they chose Napoleon, for the strategy part.

or it's just a good brand name, highly recognizable.

i agree with donald - i bet everyone remembers at least "this napoleon project" its not that important to remember the full name just google a few keywords like coin or whatever and you will find napoleonx in every search engine

Rigorous

full member

Activity: 574

Merit: 115

Filecoin also entered a crowded field. There were already similar storage-based projects like Sia, Maidsafe and Storj. That didn't stop Filecoin from breaking the ICO record, raising $257 million.

I think the most important contributor is the project leaders' network. The Filecoin creator was already known for IPFS and being in Silicon Valley it's easier to get in touch with tech investors.

cantdecide

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 112

Quote from: levyashin on September 21, 2017, 06:09:25 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on September 21, 2017, 05:37:40 AM

Quote from: stormcleric on September 21, 2017, 04:47:35 AM

Quote from: thepo1m on September 21, 2017, 03:03:22 AM

Quote from: toolucky98 on September 21, 2017, 02:19:18 AM

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 01:33:32 AM

On the site cryptocompare the price of the token was corrected, but the description still has a mistake:
Min Cap - 25 000 ETH | Soft Cap - 100 000 ETH | Max Cap - Uncapped

Or, not mistake? Uncapped project is not good for promotion

Its a mistake, that 100.000 ETH is the max cap for this project not soft cap. And the actual limit is the hidden cap, and it will be 100.000 ETH or less

I think the Maximum xap is reachable in few day, 100,000Ethers is around $30 million.
But my concern now is that alot of similar projects are poping up in the space and for me I still believe in network effect and the space will evolve into winner takes it all

Similar projects are not a problem - there are several ways to be highlighted among your competitors. But I'm not so confident about the max cap. Market is saturated with ICOs and this one will be affected too. Hope they can develop their project anyway.

Similar projects could also be a benefit for you, if they are not as good as for example NapoleonX. If their marketing, experience and product seems to be not enough it can boost the other projects because people get more trust in this.

For NapoleonX we have a experienced team which already worked successful with a similar project in non crypto assets. So a really good base.

But yes, the current ICO boom is really a problem. In the end only the ICO will show if enough people trust in NapoleonX. It's a great project with a lot of possibilities.

It was easier conduct an ico before then. Now too many icos make people doubt about it. Sometimes you don't even hear a good ico already finished or you find a very good project but market don't think so. I love watching and participating icos, i can say that for lately near all of it dropped their expectations after icos start.

True, it was easier before. But also there are still projects which get a lot of money in a really short time, or at least in a not too long time. If you have enough marketing and a well explained project and the demand for it. Let's see how NapoleonX is performing

They want to show their beta before ICO, and the devs are really working hard to answer all questions. It's a good sign.

Elkmar

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 100

Quote from: LeyMonte on September 21, 2017, 06:57:57 AM

whats the difference of your minimum cap and the target cap? what if you will not achieved the tgarget and only the minimum cap, would that mean ico is not successful?

Yes, I would like to be explained what's the difference between min cap and soft cap too by the way.

LeyMonte

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

whats the difference of your minimum cap and the target cap? what if you will not achieved the tgarget and only the minimum cap, would that mean ico is not successful?

levyashin

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 276

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

Quote from: cantdecide on September 21, 2017, 05:37:40 AM

Quote from: stormcleric on September 21, 2017, 04:47:35 AM

Quote from: thepo1m on September 21, 2017, 03:03:22 AM

Quote from: toolucky98 on September 21, 2017, 02:19:18 AM

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 01:33:32 AM

On the site cryptocompare the price of the token was corrected, but the description still has a mistake:
Min Cap - 25 000 ETH | Soft Cap - 100 000 ETH | Max Cap - Uncapped

Or, not mistake? Uncapped project is not good for promotion

Its a mistake, that 100.000 ETH is the max cap for this project not soft cap. And the actual limit is the hidden cap, and it will be 100.000 ETH or less

I think the Maximum xap is reachable in few day, 100,000Ethers is around $30 million.
But my concern now is that alot of similar projects are poping up in the space and for me I still believe in network effect and the space will evolve into winner takes it all

Similar projects are not a problem - there are several ways to be highlighted among your competitors. But I'm not so confident about the max cap. Market is saturated with ICOs and this one will be affected too. Hope they can develop their project anyway.

Similar projects could also be a benefit for you, if they are not as good as for example NapoleonX. If their marketing, experience and product seems to be not enough it can boost the other projects because people get more trust in this.

For NapoleonX we have a experienced team which already worked successful with a similar project in non crypto assets. So a really good base.

But yes, the current ICO boom is really a problem. In the end only the ICO will show if enough people trust in NapoleonX. It's a great project with a lot of possibilities.

It was easier conduct an ico before then. Now too many icos make people doubt about it. Sometimes you don't even hear a good ico already finished or you find a very good project but market don't think so. I love watching and participating icos, i can say that for lately near all of it dropped their expectations after icos start.

ParRus

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 104

Quote from: the_donald on September 21, 2017, 05:49:34 AM

Quote from: pynetx on September 21, 2017, 03:48:31 AM

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 02:27:42 AM

A small article about cryptocurrency and NaPoleonX

https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-disrupts-asset-management-using-proof-of-performance

It's a good thing that cointelegraph covered NaPoleonX at this time when the ICO not far. It will help in getting some eyes on the projects.

this is great news, more eyeballs on the project means a greater number of investors.

agree, good article - It's important for potential investors to consider the project from all sides,
more and more quality reviews about NaPoleonX and it's great

the_donald

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 100

Quote from: pynetx on September 21, 2017, 03:48:31 AM

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 02:27:42 AM

A small article about cryptocurrency and NaPoleonX

https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-disrupts-asset-management-using-proof-of-performance

It's a good thing that cointelegraph covered NaPoleonX at this time when the ICO not far. It will help in getting some eyes on the projects.

this is great news, more eyeballs on the project means a greater number of investors.

cantdecide

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 112

Quote from: stormcleric on September 21, 2017, 04:47:35 AM

Quote from: thepo1m on September 21, 2017, 03:03:22 AM

Quote from: toolucky98 on September 21, 2017, 02:19:18 AM

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 01:33:32 AM

On the site cryptocompare the price of the token was corrected, but the description still has a mistake:
Min Cap - 25 000 ETH | Soft Cap - 100 000 ETH | Max Cap - Uncapped

Or, not mistake? Uncapped project is not good for promotion

Its a mistake, that 100.000 ETH is the max cap for this project not soft cap. And the actual limit is the hidden cap, and it will be 100.000 ETH or less

I think the Maximum xap is reachable in few day, 100,000Ethers is around $30 million.
But my concern now is that alot of similar projects are poping up in the space and for me I still believe in network effect and the space will evolve into winner takes it all

Similar projects are not a problem - there are several ways to be highlighted among your competitors. But I'm not so confident about the max cap. Market is saturated with ICOs and this one will be affected too. Hope they can develop their project anyway.

Similar projects could also be a benefit for you, if they are not as good as for example NapoleonX. If their marketing, experience and product seems to be not enough it can boost the other projects because people get more trust in this.

For NapoleonX we have a experienced team which already worked successful with a similar project in non crypto assets. So a really good base.

But yes, the current ICO boom is really a problem. In the end only the ICO will show if enough people trust in NapoleonX. It's a great project with a lot of possibilities.

stormcleric

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: thepo1m on September 21, 2017, 03:03:22 AM

Quote from: toolucky98 on September 21, 2017, 02:19:18 AM

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 01:33:32 AM

On the site cryptocompare the price of the token was corrected, but the description still has a mistake:
Min Cap - 25 000 ETH | Soft Cap - 100 000 ETH | Max Cap - Uncapped

Or, not mistake? Uncapped project is not good for promotion

Its a mistake, that 100.000 ETH is the max cap for this project not soft cap. And the actual limit is the hidden cap, and it will be 100.000 ETH or less

I think the Maximum xap is reachable in few day, 100,000Ethers is around $30 million.
But my concern now is that alot of similar projects are poping up in the space and for me I still believe in network effect and the space will evolve into winner takes it all

Similar projects are not a problem - there are several ways to be highlighted among your competitors. But I'm not so confident about the max cap. Market is saturated with ICOs and this one will be affected too. Hope they can develop their project anyway.

viljy

hero member

Activity: 1736

Merit: 857

I see this thread grows very quickly. It is understandable, it discusses the real use of tokens in algorithmic trading. And they promise real profits. The system is explained clearly and transparently. While many ICO artificially attract different types of offline business to the blockchain, which with crypto-currencies is often not compatible at all. And Napoleon very organically joins the blockchain of technology and exchange trade. I'm even wondering how successful ICO will be, which will soon take place.

pynetx

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 262

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 02:27:42 AM

A small article about cryptocurrency and NaPoleonX

https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-disrupts-asset-management-using-proof-of-performance

It's a good thing that cointelegraph covered NaPoleonX at this time when the ICO not far. It will help in getting some eyes on the projects.

thepo1m

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: toolucky98 on September 21, 2017, 02:19:18 AM

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 01:33:32 AM

On the site cryptocompare the price of the token was corrected, but the description still has a mistake:
Min Cap - 25 000 ETH | Soft Cap - 100 000 ETH | Max Cap - Uncapped

Or, not mistake? Uncapped project is not good for promotion

Its a mistake, that 100.000 ETH is the max cap for this project not soft cap. And the actual limit is the hidden cap, and it will be 100.000 ETH or less

I think the Maximum xap is reachable in few day, 100,000Ethers is around $30 million.
But my concern now is that alot of similar projects are poping up in the space and for me I still believe in network effect and the space will evolve into winner takes it all

Departure

sr. member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 288

A small article about cryptocurrency and NaPoleonX

https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-disrupts-asset-management-using-proof-of-performance

Departure

sr. member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 288

Quote from: Trrrt on September 21, 2017, 01:56:11 AM

The project is capped by an hidden cap.

hidden cap is between 40k and 100k ETH, not Uncapped project

toolucky98

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 100

Quote from: Departure on September 21, 2017, 01:33:32 AM

On the site cryptocompare the price of the token was corrected, but the description still has a mistake:
Min Cap - 25 000 ETH | Soft Cap - 100 000 ETH | Max Cap - Uncapped

Or, not mistake? Uncapped project is not good for promotion

Its a mistake, that 100.000 ETH is the max cap for this project not soft cap. And the actual limit is the hidden cap, and it will be 100.000 ETH or less

Trrrt

full member

Activity: 448

Merit: 107

The project is capped by an hidden cap.
NapoleonX is really a good name for the brand, napoleon is a strong reference at the french culture, and X is a reference at the polytechnique school, one of the best univserity worldwide, a lot of people in the NapoleonX project are from polytechnique. And trust me the team behind NapoleonX are not here to joke with us, they are really solid and serious and the project will be huge.

Departure

sr. member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 288

On the site cryptocompare the price of the token was corrected, but the description still has a mistake:
Min Cap - 25 000 ETH | Soft Cap - 100 000 ETH | Max Cap - Uncapped

Or, not mistake? Uncapped project is not good for promotion

niklasmato

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 263

@Dev will you be streaming the presentation on the London Blockchain summit live or record it and post it to bitcointalk?
It would be nice to see it for all the people who can't go

Departure

sr. member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 288

Quote from: pynetx on September 21, 2017, 12:02:20 AM

Just checked the NaPoleonX on cryptocompare and website link is wrong. it leads to: http://napoleonindex.com/
Could you please ask the cc team to update it as cc is a major website in crypto space and it can help get a lot of traction.
https://www.cryptocompare.com/coins/npx/overview

Yes, I wrote about this a few pages ago. The developer said that everything will be fixed.

Topic: [ANN][ICO] [NaPoleonX] 1st 🌟French🌟 algorithmic crypto asset manager 🚀 - page 189. (Read 70190 times)