Topic: [ANN][ICOO] ICO OpenLedger - THE OFFICIAL ICO PRE-LAUNCH TOKEN - page 12. (Read 39267 times)

I make so much cash by myself though. I would want to get like 10x returns at least within a year. What do you expect the return to be on this token? 1 year and then in 5 years.

I like the idea of giving a team of people my money and having them invest it for me. I have wanted someone to do that for me for years.

ICOO is an Hybrid token:
It is a fund that owns some valuable tokens
It earn part of the commission produced by the ICOO services through a common burning system

ICOO does not directly own OpenLedger, the right token that is directly related with Open Ledger is Obits.

Paolo Rebuffo

Hallo Ronny, and hallo to all here at ICOO thread. I'm Paolo Rebuffo, I write with the nick Viva! because..... well it's a funny story that involve one of my best friend and a couple of Bitcoin ATM, long time ago.

 I write the original ICOO white paper and then share the idea with Ronny .Then,  He realize my original idea in a clever manner, so ICOO now is even better than the project I had in my brain.

ICOO as any valuable service is the answer to a need, two needs to be precise.

1) The need to trade immediately every new coin even in the pre-launch phase
2) The need to have a complete promotional and professional services for issuers who want the marketing infrastructure to launch theri project

Open Ledger, CCDEK and bitshare blockchain are the best ecosystem to realize such a services they almost do it by Design.

All the best to all
Paolo Rebuffo

(2 000 000 / 1000) * 450 = $900,000 USD

So if we buy this are we just buying a fund that owns other tokens on openledger? I want to own openledger. Do we own openledger if we buy this?

Here is a major issue Ronny. You are referring to this as just an "ICO to be something special and worthwhile", But its not just an ICO. You talk about this project like its complete once the ICO is finished... Thats a big red flag. Being as you as well as other board members are affiliated with many ICO's in progress, you need to address this by focusing on a single project, and driving it to completion before you end up with a handful of projects that are shitty and have earned you the reputation of an ignorant scammer. (Not calling you a scammer here). But you need to be aware, you have to DELIVER what is promised to people, and cant just ICO an ICO then ICO that ICO's ICO pre-ANN ICO fund.  

My personal opinion is that you should be using your own damn money to start this business. It seems like it could go mainstream, why are you selling this to the online cryptocommunity ?


P.S. Openledger is a horrible exchange, you should get away from it.

You are asking for the marketcap of an asset just launched with a change in price over four tiers, and a total issued amount of 20 million tokens where any not sold tokens will be burned, so it is really hard to tell you the marketcap with another 41 days to go.

all the best

Ronny

What is the marketcap of this coin?

I believe the asset ICOO as well as the already available assets OBITS and BTSR will all become vital parts of an ever increasing amount of ecosystems, where each of them can live and thrive on their own on the Decentralized Conglomerate OpenLedger, but more importantly they will all become so much more succesful when interacting and supporting eachother with crosspromotion in so many different ways.

The great many possibilities to add value to Openledger and its ecosystems, of which the present ones are only the first of many future projects involved in this never ending story of constant progress and innovation. It is a movie not served as a trilogy for perfect understanding, but more of a long night box office monster hit with an ending of 5D dimensions where each participant plays an active part in the final outcome.

I believe in the future as being one where all is working from the core and out, and it goes for the DC itself as well as each ecosystem represented as well, and the BTS platform is a perfect place as the foundation for such an interesting goal as the platform itself has been created with the very purpose of unlimited possibilities of development on top of it.

I have said it many times, and will say it again. With the great many possibilities at hand "The sky is the limit"

All the best

Ronny Boesing
CCEDK

Paolo Rebuffo has agreed to join the advisory board again, and wil be available to answer questions to the general concept and idea behind this project, as it was initially an idea born by him and presented to me in one of our many talks on how to bring added value to the decentralized exchange OpenLedger, and exchange built on top of the BTS 2.0 platform.

I appreciate his support and trust in me greatly and I am happy to have him here presented on the advisory board.

Only two days ago we were sitting together in Prague at the recent bitcoin conference discussing the great many future prelaunch ICO's we can expect to present on OpenLedger, all of which will help create not only added revenue stream to the ICOO holders, and just as importantly liquidity, but also a great many new users and as such an increased traction of trading and traffic in general acrss the many assets presented on Openledger.

Thank you once again for your support

Ronny Boesing
CCEDK ApS
DK-9492 Blokhus
Denmark

This is what I know about Chris Bates:

1. When asked to assist in writing the scripts for more of our videos he stepped in and did a great job

2. When asked to assist in making my presentations more fluent and clear in presentation and structure, he stepped and did a great job

3. When asked to create the pre ann thread of ICOO, as well as present with its structure and well presented text and body content, he stepped in and did a great job, a job also recommended elsewhere in this thread.

I have known him in 2016 only, and in this time I have only known him for a great guy helping out as much as possble whenever there was a need for help in presenting a text with structure in as fluent and articulate english as possible.

In this time I have known him, he has never asked for anything, I have been the one offering him something for his work whenever I felt it was time to show my appreciation, and same way when I was deciding to add an advisory boeard to the project, all in all he has been humble in so many ways, and I thought it adequate to ask if he could have an interest in this, simply because I felt he had contributed in getting this project in the air so to speak.

I have learned to know him not only by name but also by face and in person, and in a way where he has managed to deliver whenever expected, and in so many ways a good guy.

I am sorry to experience about his past on this thread and what it has created as fud, and I am sorry it has managed to put focus away from what is important in this thread.

Chris has decided to step down and leave the project for the sake of the project, and I thank him for the work he has done. It is greatly appreciated.

Personally I believe that the Bitland project and its cadastrals have great potential, it is a big project and I wish it all the success possible, it seems however that due to it still being in its early phase and still represented as an ICO itself, it may have been premature to consider this as part of the ICOO structure, and this part of the profit distribution has therefore been removed for now and its part has instead been added to the ICOO holders as part of the buyback and burn, and I hope perhaps in the near future a vote from the ICOO holders will allow it a place inside once again.

Gods speed, and lets hope the world will learn to appreciate you sometime soon.

Ronny Boesing
CCEDK ApS
DK-9492 Blokhus
Denmark

Salutations Mr. Boesing,

I'm excited when people of your stature embrace open communications and projects throughout the globe.
This cryptoverse or industry as you put it is picking up more momentum and actors monthly as blockchain technology becomes more widely used.

Over the years many of us find actors like to perform on different forums and we have to eventually keep track of them. Additionally track the work they produce or lack there of. Creating a rudimentary human-ledger of them and what has transpired from their actions. Sometimes this is difficult to asses, other times its blatantly obvious what the actor does with the communities resources.

When I was shown this thread. It wasn't hard to find the rattling chains linked to the questionable actor - Christopher Bates - causing it. This is what I see. The proof of what he's done and lack there of in this community, is also quite clear, and found on this Prozcoin thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10726977 . CB is the ProzCoin user establishing himself as the developer.
He took BTC under the agreement he would produce a coin/wallet. He didn't, left the project, and has shown no intention to make contributions back to the original supporters (I've not found anything posted that the BTC was given back).

Now CB is using another user name (tabali tigi) on BCT. He's now part of two ICO projects. Which your part of as well.
This can't be ignored.




 

your 'delist' list has become a reference. an ICO may not want to risk it.

If you value the long term viability and health of your project, you need to eject that Chris guy ASAP.

SJW's like him are absolutely toxic to a successful enterprise.

I don't understand this post. I am not calling anyone a fraud. I just wanted to see if I could help get some legitimate projects on any site.

Dafuq? Who was being racist? I'm already out.

Backed out perhaps they never want to list their ICO to your site. They are still in the crowdfunding stage asking more than what they can afford will definitely make them bend backwards.
You might wanna create a thread about Christopher or Ronny being fraud for not having a word.

Yes it is I know him, he do so many interest and clever projects right now.

The Icoo project earns money from the fees requested by two types of SUBJECT:

1) The subscribers of a new ICO through ICOO. Subscribers in exchange of a small commission will be able to trade the token signed in pre-launch on Open Ledger

2) The creators of new projects which will have a comprehensive platform for both emit and to promote (via BTSR and other channels)  their tokens through ICOO services for professionals.

The collected commissions, month to month will be burned by deflating the amount of ICOO coins in circulation.

 ICOO over time will increase within  a certain amount of high-value tokens (such as DGD) becoming a real investment fund and at the same time a company that does business

I too think Ronny is a honest man. I have been following his work since the creation of CCEDK.

I don't think having a failed ICO makes you a scammer. From what I understand (I could be wrong) ICOs are 'donations', not a promise to make you money. So spend only what you can afford to lose.

I don't agree in calling people a racist without direct proof.

Just my two bitcoins.