A degree of accuracy would improve your report considerably, as would some indication that you had done basic and independent research to understand the concept or current state of business development - rather than publishing inaccurate material and then expecting the project's founders to take the time and effort to compensate for your lack of competence.
Hi guys, ICOrating team here.
Thank you for your comments, we took them into account.
We usually write only few reports per month and make them very detailed and comprehensive (about 30 pages).
The report on Incent was our first and experimental attempt to create an express report - a short and less detailed review that would still give potential investors a picture of the company. Since it was an experimental report, written in a shorter than usual period of time, it’s quite possible that it was of a lower quality than usual.
We’re dropping this format, since it proved to be unsuccessful and does not meet our standards and we’re removing our Incent review for the revision.
Thank you.