by the way, how many
individual users swapped their coins for KTN? You mentioned 9,000 a few times but there are only 228 incoming transactions
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/karm/address.dws?1024695.htmfrom what I have seen, most of those transactions came from the largest wallet Karma has (which is one of the STOLEN exchange wallets). And the majority of KTN tokens are owned by the person who stole the exchange wallet. From what it looks like,
greater than 90% of KTN.
How many different people are there invested in KTN? (Something to consider if a KTN swap is offered)
How do you arrive with those words? How will you make me trust you if this early on the discussion you are using such methods?
"
what greater than 90% of KTN held by the stolen KARMA wallet holder" are you saying??
(source:
https://xchain.io/asset/KARMATOKEN, June 15, 2017)
Even the KTN main wallet don't have 90%. The highest KTN aside from the main wallet is also visible. Why kosmost, why do you say that
Isn't the first address (the one with 61% of all coins) the one you are managing?
I.e., the ones that were not used in the KARMA -> KTN swap?
This makes the second largest address the address with most coins that belongs to someone that traded Karma -> KTN?
In this case the largest single trade involved trading close to 2 billion Karma, not 11 billion nor 20 billion.
I'm sure kosmost and others had at some point close to that, and they are not exchanges...
So, what is the problem here with KTN?
I see no problem.
And why do you keep saying there are 9,000 KTN "holders"?
Aren't most of those addresses with KTN the result of an airdrop?
So how can you be sure there are not multiple addresses belonging to the same person?
Maybe there are 1,000 or 9,000 KTN holders... no one knows.. but saying there are over 9,000 holders is wrong.
Considering all this, if we not count with the first address (61% of all coins), as those coins weren't even the result of a Karma -> KTN swap, I believe that allowing the other addresses to send coins to swap to a new Karma coin (or Good Coin... I also like the name) would not pose any problem.