Author

Topic: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo - An Open, Composable Smart Chain Platform, Secured by B - page 208. (Read 1192056 times)

member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
So if I understand correctly...

NXT, is the asset chain platform on which supernet etc are build. KMD is built on the supernet platform or is that a completely separate chain?
I read that the NXT asset chains are being moved to the Barterdex platform. Today NXT is the top gain and top volume token on Bittrex, it might be nice to make a post on the NXT twitter that the chains and thus the NXT asset exchange is being moved to/ exchanged to the Barterdex platform no?

ARDR is build on the NXT platform, is ARDR also related to KMD than in a way?


Kind of confused atm Smiley
KMD has nothing to do with NXT or ARDR, dont confuse yourself
NXT decided it didnt want any active AE (asset exchange) so they made sure it was not a good place for assets and their wish came true. this is years old.

current NXT pump is simply due to ICO mania for IGNIS coin which is the identical function as NXT, just with a 50% tax.

When MONA is valued higher than KMD, nothing surprises me

Aha, ok! Thought I read somewhere in the previous pages that Unity was related to NXT and UNITY is the new name of Supernet which is the mother company of KMD.
My bad!
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS? 

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool

Agreed that the wallet issues have been a major problem, and it is bewildering why it was considered so low priority and has taken so long to fix.
It doesn't matter how hard the dev team works or how great the tech is, if the wallet is literally unusable this is a major and frustrating stumbling point that will turn many people away.
Having said that, once the wallet all the other teething issues have been sorted out hopefully the project will really take off and all the fantastic work jl777 and the rest of the team have done on a daily basis will be better recognized and appreciated.


On short term the wallet issues are not good for new users. They could get frustrated indeed. But this is new tech and it takes time to develop properly. In the mid-long term this period will be forgotten and you will be happy to joined Komodo!  Smiley
What wallet issues are actually still left?

The Agama wallet on debian stretch doesn't work in lite mode. It says:
Connection error!
DASHBOARD.SPV_CONN_ERROR_SPV1 <--
DASHBOARD.SPV.CONN_ERROR_SPV2 <--

In native mode it works fine. The blockchain is downloaded within one or two hours.
full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS?  

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool

Agreed that the wallet issues have been a major problem, and it is bewildering why it was considered so low priority and has taken so long to fix.
It doesn't matter how hard the dev team works or how great the tech is, if the wallet is literally unusable this is a major and frustrating stumbling point that will turn many people away.
Having said that, once the wallet all the other teething issues have been sorted out hopefully the project will really take off and all the fantastic work jl777 and the rest of the team have done on a daily basis will be better recognized and appreciated.


On short term the wallet issues are not good for new users. They could get frustrated indeed. But this is new tech and it takes time to develop properly. In the mid-long term this period will be forgotten and you will be happy to joined Komodo!  Smiley
What wallet issues are actually still left?

For example 24g does not install on Ubuntu Tongue Beside some wallet fixes = some features turned off. Not a perfect way of fixing bugs.

Anyway it's just partial problem with gui, partial with way of communication / wallet notifications / announcing new wallets and some comments on what condition they should work.

If wallet will communicate on each unsuspected event what is the reason, and will contain some manual page and FAQ then this could help avoid shity questions and saying nothing works.

With communication there is also progress,+1 for publishing video tutorials, but good some way to link them inside wallet, or make inside wallets "release comments/usage/working conditions/tutorials).

So to sum it up, there are some improvements in wallet, however there are still some fixes to be done (and features to bring back) + communication to polish. I also believe this "around-wallet-communication-notifications" slows adoption and is reflected in market price: normal user simply downloads, installs, if sth does not work intuitively - he just deletes, if all works - buys KMD and sends to his wallet.

If anything does not function like it should or is different then in other commonly used wallets (here some "wallet functionality market analysis" needed) - then the wallet/app must communicate it with some notifications for first time users. Of course this is not a must have feature to work, but a must have to get a big adoption.

Hope my feedback helps.

full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS? 

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool

Agreed that the wallet issues have been a major problem, and it is bewildering why it was considered so low priority and has taken so long to fix.
It doesn't matter how hard the dev team works or how great the tech is, if the wallet is literally unusable this is a major and frustrating stumbling point that will turn many people away.
Having said that, once the wallet all the other teething issues have been sorted out hopefully the project will really take off and all the fantastic work jl777 and the rest of the team have done on a daily basis will be better recognized and appreciated.


On short term the wallet issues are not good for new users. They could get frustrated indeed. But this is new tech and it takes time to develop properly. In the mid-long term this period will be forgotten and you will be happy to joined Komodo!  Smiley

Spot on. It is frustrating having to jump through hoops to get the wallet to work. But I look at it this way...If the entire blockchain industry was easy , the masses would be involved which means the opportunities for massive returns would be in the past. Yes,very frustrating but I will take that over an easy entry point for the masses at this early stage in the technology.

Ken
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS? 

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool

Agreed that the wallet issues have been a major problem, and it is bewildering why it was considered so low priority and has taken so long to fix.
It doesn't matter how hard the dev team works or how great the tech is, if the wallet is literally unusable this is a major and frustrating stumbling point that will turn many people away.
Having said that, once the wallet all the other teething issues have been sorted out hopefully the project will really take off and all the fantastic work jl777 and the rest of the team have done on a daily basis will be better recognized and appreciated.


On short term the wallet issues are not good for new users. They could get frustrated indeed. But this is new tech and it takes time to develop properly. In the mid-long term this period will be forgotten and you will be happy to joined Komodo!  Smiley
What wallet issues are actually still left?
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133
May I ask why the team hide the name and photos ?
it is not good

and why also the Github not active since 3 month ago ?




master branch is not updated so often, all the work happens in the dev branch or spvdex branch and then as it tests out it is merged upwards

I have always been anonymous and will stay that way, but the vast majority of the team isnt. there are many video's etc.

When we will see another Github update ?

github.com/jl777 is updated daily, usually many times
I think you are looking at the wrong githubs
github.com/jl777/komodo
github.com/jl777/SuperNET

above two are the main repositories I am working on, look in the dev and spvdex branches
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
May I ask why the team hide the name and photos ?
it is not good

and why also the Github not active since 3 month ago ?




master branch is not updated so often, all the work happens in the dev branch or spvdex branch and then as it tests out it is merged upwards

I have always been anonymous and will stay that way, but the vast majority of the team isnt. there are many video's etc.

When we will see another Github update ?
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Basically if anyone is having a problem with latest agama like I do, my alternative is going back to swing wallet to claim interest. I don't mind waiting for 4 hours to loud because I am claiming my interest once a week.

How much interest in %/week and where? Is it safe? You get more kmd/ week? :0
legendary
Activity: 1205
Merit: 1000
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS? 

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool

Agreed that the wallet issues have been a major problem, and it is bewildering why it was considered so low priority and has taken so long to fix.
It doesn't matter how hard the dev team works or how great the tech is, if the wallet is literally unusable this is a major and frustrating stumbling point that will turn many people away.
Having said that, once the wallet all the other teething issues have been sorted out hopefully the project will really take off and all the fantastic work jl777 and the rest of the team have done on a daily basis will be better recognized and appreciated.


On short term the wallet issues are not good for new users. They could get frustrated indeed. But this is new tech and it takes time to develop properly. In the mid-long term this period will be forgotten and you will be happy to joined Komodo!  Smiley
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS? 

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool

Agreed that the wallet issues have been a major problem, and it is bewildering why it was considered so low priority and has taken so long to fix.
It doesn't matter how hard the dev team works or how great the tech is, if the wallet is literally unusable this is a major and frustrating stumbling point that will turn many people away.
Having said that, once the wallet all the other teething issues have been sorted out hopefully the project will really take off and all the fantastic work jl777 and the rest of the team have done on a daily basis will be better recognized and appreciated.



who said it was low priority? I only said that I cant do the gui, others have to do it.
also, what issues are left to fix in the wallet? If after we fix the issues, people still complain about the issue that is fixed, then it would appear that it isnt fixed, even though it has been fixed

so what wallet issues are still there with the LATEST wallet on a system that doesnt have an older version interfering? Let us not complain that the blockchain takes time to load, that is simply the way blockchain's work. So use SPV mode to avoid blockchain loading.

If the bugs are fixed, then how can we fix the wallet issues that are already fixed?
hero member
Activity: 650
Merit: 502
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS? 

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool

Agreed that the wallet issues have been a major problem, and it is bewildering why it was considered so low priority and has taken so long to fix.
It doesn't matter how hard the dev team works or how great the tech is, if the wallet is literally unusable this is a major and frustrating stumbling point that will turn many people away.
Having said that, once the wallet all the other teething issues have been sorted out hopefully the project will really take off and all the fantastic work jl777 and the rest of the team have done on a daily basis will be better recognized and appreciated.


full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133
Im running Agama v2.0.24g-beta. I've sent 100 KMDs from my bittrex account to a Jumblr address: RMAtNtmpQEmwQk71T6j3sX5VKxiUjNQqth..  my jumblr wallet is up to date, but i have not  received anything..

so in total i withdrew 100.004 KMD so that 100 would be deposited, transactionids:

81b2f368cfda72b3f6f53db446d465d9e55ecb52843e536fabd771a232a55456
536852def6f0a011fd37cd5db8d72d82659dce93fc82d2cbaf3db36e566621a4


I've imported the private key of the jumblr kmd address to my normal kmd wallet and managed to send KMD's to it, but still the 100 from bittrex is lost..

what to do next?
look in the explorer
https://kmd.explorer.supernet.org/address/RMAtNtmpQEmwQk71T6j3sX5VKxiUjNQqth

704 KMD are there

do a validateaddress RMAtNtmpQEmwQk71T6j3sX5VKxiUjNQqth and if ismine:false do the importprivkey as whatever you did, didnt get the privkey into the wallet for that address

if ismine:true then dont forget to rescan as it wont rescan by default and it will only see new tx to that address

Yes, after a little search i came accross this explorer and had a little sigh of relief, thnx for the advice, i'm rescanning now. Hope this works.

Another question. I bought a Ledger Nano S. How does my agama wallet know, when i restore my coins in the wallet to claim interest, that these are the same coins and how many interest to pay out? Is this address bound? So do i need to use the same address for restoring the coins?
interest is based on utxo and the nLockTime field for accruing. ledger does not claim the interest.
you can send coins to any address, a wallet that knows how to spend the interest will spend the interest.

it is accrued on the blockchain, spent by compliant wallets

Yes the rescanning worked, i now have all my KMD's back, thnx!!!

So about the interest.. Lets say i have 100 KMD in my agama wallet now.. I store them on my Ledger. After 2 months i send them back to my agama wallet to claim interests, thereafter i restore them on my ledger. How many interest will i get?:

((100KMD * .05%) / 12 months) * 2 = 0.833333KMD

is this correct, or do i need to hold them on my agama wallet all the time?

it is the spending that collects the interest. we might have a way to get the privkey that ledger uses, so you can importprivkey into agama and then claim via agama. this however defeats the purpose of the ledger security as the privkey would now not be limited to the ledger
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Im running Agama v2.0.24g-beta. I've sent 100 KMDs from my bittrex account to a Jumblr address: RMAtNtmpQEmwQk71T6j3sX5VKxiUjNQqth..  my jumblr wallet is up to date, but i have not  received anything..

so in total i withdrew 100.004 KMD so that 100 would be deposited, transactionids:

81b2f368cfda72b3f6f53db446d465d9e55ecb52843e536fabd771a232a55456
536852def6f0a011fd37cd5db8d72d82659dce93fc82d2cbaf3db36e566621a4


I've imported the private key of the jumblr kmd address to my normal kmd wallet and managed to send KMD's to it, but still the 100 from bittrex is lost..

what to do next?
look in the explorer
https://kmd.explorer.supernet.org/address/RMAtNtmpQEmwQk71T6j3sX5VKxiUjNQqth

704 KMD are there

do a validateaddress RMAtNtmpQEmwQk71T6j3sX5VKxiUjNQqth and if ismine:false do the importprivkey as whatever you did, didnt get the privkey into the wallet for that address

if ismine:true then dont forget to rescan as it wont rescan by default and it will only see new tx to that address

Yes, after a little search i came accross this explorer and had a little sigh of relief, thnx for the advice, i'm rescanning now. Hope this works.

Another question. I bought a Ledger Nano S. How does my agama wallet know, when i restore my coins in the wallet to claim interest, that these are the same coins and how many interest to pay out? Is this address bound? So do i need to use the same address for restoring the coins?
interest is based on utxo and the nLockTime field for accruing. ledger does not claim the interest.
you can send coins to any address, a wallet that knows how to spend the interest will spend the interest.

it is accrued on the blockchain, spent by compliant wallets

Yes the rescanning worked, i now have all my KMD's back, thnx!!!

So about the interest.. Lets say i have 100 KMD in my agama wallet now.. I store them on my Ledger. After 2 months i send them back to my agama wallet to claim interests, thereafter i restore them on my ledger. How many interest will i get?:

((100KMD * .05) / 12 months) * 2 = 0.833333KMD

is this correct, or:

- do i need to hold them on my agama wallet all the time?
- should i import the same private key to my Ledger wallet?
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133
I made a request to get an updated swing wallet build, so it can get the newest komodod that should startup in a few minutes. the init time slowness has been fixed

also I am asking to default the agama wallet in SPV mode, which I believe is what most people want. For those that want to run a full native daemon, they will have to click a few buttons.

As far as I can see there are no major issues remaining with the wallet, other than "it takes a long time to sync the chain" which cant be helped if you want to sync the blockchain as that takes time. If you dont want to sync the chain, SPV mode allows you to skip that.

With all the new assetchains now active, it is natural that there will be some issues with onboarding users who are not used to multi-coin operation. But that doesnt change the fact that for KMD usage, the recent agama is not having much problems at all.

Likely any issues are due to conflicts with older versions and #support will be able to help anybody in that situation
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 268
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS? 

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool

Early adopters get a chance of massive returns because,

1- they started early when the tech is literally being created, pre alpha stage
2- they keep up and learn how to do things, what's going on, which isn't easy

Anyone reading has achieved 1- above, but many don't realise 2- is the price we all pay for life changing opportunities.

When the wallet issues are all sorted, which they will be, the flood gates open to the masses, and the early adopter bonus reduces drastically. No pain, no gain!

member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
Servant, your name is chair
i bought a bunch of komodo and chips, cos i truly believe in this coins developer. Anyway, wondering if i can store my komodo and chip on the agama wallet on the first page. Really wish i could buy some supernet and acquire some jumblr too but am tapped out for now.
hero member
Activity: 529
Merit: 505
I'm on drugs, what's your excuse?
What do you think is holding KMD back from having as big of a market cap as other similar projects like NEO and EOS? 

IMHO all this wallet BS is the main thing.......this project launched on 01/09/2016......461 days and virtually every page on this thread has people struggling with wallets.

Cheers Jon  Cool
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 504
GoMeat - Digitalizing Meat Stores - ICO
Basically if anyone is having a problem with latest agama like I do, my alternative is going back to swing wallet to claim interest. I don't mind waiting for 4 hours to loud because I am claiming my interest once a week.
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133

did you rescan after importprivkey? if not, it only sees tx after the importprivkey was done

Hi,

yes i did rescan and it said "wallet rescaned" yet nothing unfortunately.

what do you think it might be?
is it visible via explorer?
does validateaddress show ismine:true?

if the above two are true, then a rescan will show the coins

Both a true but apparently its not showing. I also distinctly remember, in order to claim interest, before there was the claim button.. it was like sending the funds to the same address.. and that is what i did. so i have like few more around ~615 instead of the initial 605.

Still have the seed and WIF.

I will send you the screenshots of these "true" on slack tomorrow morning, hope we can work this out. i want to get this working before any dICOs. Also investing more into KMD but they are still on my exchange and don't want to send them to my wallet unles this is solved really.

thankyou
just ask in #support, I am not familiar with gui details
legendary
Activity: 1146
Merit: 1006

did you rescan after importprivkey? if not, it only sees tx after the importprivkey was done

Hi,

yes i did rescan and it said "wallet rescaned" yet nothing unfortunately.

what do you think it might be?
is it visible via explorer?
does validateaddress show ismine:true?

if the above two are true, then a rescan will show the coins

Both a true but apparently its not showing. I also distinctly remember, in order to claim interest, before there was the claim button.. it was like sending the funds to the same address.. and that is what i did. so i have like few more around ~615 instead of the initial 605.

Still have the seed and WIF.

I will send you the screenshots of these "true" on slack tomorrow morning, hope we can work this out. i want to get this working before any dICOs. Also investing more into KMD but they are still on my exchange and don't want to send them to my wallet unles this is solved really.

thankyou
Jump to: