Creator there's a lot promised and advertised, buyers were many when EOS was not make until but Komodo created silently and efficiently
ETH also made quietly and also cost $ 1 for a long time, fame began as soon as it bought by the first billionaire
Topic: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo - An Open, Composable Smart Chain Platform, Secured by B - page 26. (Read 1192336 times)
April 05, 2019, 04:19:40 AM
April 05, 2019, 04:15:50 AM
If you think the only difference between EOS and KMD is the time of new block generation, you have a big mistake. EOS is the most largest and most successful project in the history of cryptocurrencies up to now. EOS has earned more than $ 4 billion in the ICO, which serves the development of this huge platform, and this is the guarantor of the success of this popular platform. EOS is a well-designed and acclaimed platform which is the result of the experiences that Daniel Larimer has gained from its three previous successful projects. But KMD is made by the JL777 which could not been able to finish even one small project after six years of activity in the Crypto world.
EOS is worse than Komodo in all parameters except block time:
1. No proof of work
2. less bandwidth, 3000 transactions per second against 20000
3. a short address of 12 characters, which can be used to calculate the private key, the recent theft of the cold key from the exchange is proof of that
4. was freezing of the funds of the user with the requirement to explain the origin
5. there is no sense in the coin, Visa is better and Windows is better
1- Position in marketcap
2. The number of main exchanges
3. Daily trading volume
4. The amount of capital attraction
5. The number of investors and users
6. The power of the development team
7. Marketing
8. Number of development projects on the platform
9. and ...
April 05, 2019, 03:59:55 AM
then it's okay
April 05, 2019, 03:58:51 AM
It's about EOS not bringing the TPS they promise.
Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
Please do not sophistry!Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
I know James since the launch of the BTCD and I was an investor in his several projects that never ended and now I don't have free time to worthless argue with you.
history exist to clarify these issues!!!
BTCD or BCD ?
Basically it was a stupid combination of failures. I use Windows 10 and tried to claim BTCP and BCD. Both with the Electrum version for their blockchains.
I used the same long password for different things - especially my password safe had the same pw as the DASH QT wallet. So after I started the Electrum clients (which I tested before with Defender, SuperAntiSpyware and www.virustotal.com) I had to do a little thing in DASHQT - that was it - the one of the wallets, most likely BCD, spied my password through a keylogger and the hacker had access to everything.
(there is no need to discuss the stupidity of using Win10, same passwords many times, storing 2FA codes in password safes or testing new software on a vulnerable system)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48476147
BTCD was symbol of BitcoinDark.
April 05, 2019, 03:55:32 AM
If you think the only difference between EOS and KMD is the time of new block generation, you have a big mistake. EOS is the most largest and most successful project in the history of cryptocurrencies up to now. EOS has earned more than $ 4 billion in the ICO, which serves the development of this huge platform, and this is the guarantor of the success of this popular platform. EOS is a well-designed and acclaimed platform which is the result of the experiences that Daniel Larimer has gained from its three previous successful projects. But KMD is made by the JL777 which could not been able to finish even one small project after six years of activity in the Crypto world.
EOS is worse than Komodo in all parameters except block time:
1. No proof of work
2. less bandwidth, 3000 transactions per second against 20000
3. a short address of 12 characters, which can be used to calculate the private key, the recent theft of the cold key from the exchange is proof of that
4. was freezing of the funds of the user with the requirement to explain the origin
5. there is no sense in the coin, Visa is better and Windows is better
April 05, 2019, 03:52:52 AM
You claim that Jl777 hasn't finished even the smallest projects in the last 6 years, I'd like to know which ones.
Thank you
You are right!Thank you
Because at that time you probably were not familiar with Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies!
TL;DR : James defined about dozens of crypto projects in year of 2014 and after that.
then he was created and offered assets for each project on NXT platform. After that, time passed and no progress was made in the projects. then these assets were undervalued and obliterated, and many investors were affected like me. after that the game has continued until today, by converting it's projects to each other and changing their names and goals.
I was also active in the crypto universe at James' NXT times.
I also own these assets.
These assets were migrated to the KMD chain.
Projects like JumblR, Dex and other assets have been functional for a long time now -
Dex is even the world leader with over 116000 Atomic Swaps!
So I can't understand the statement that many projects were not finished here.
April 05, 2019, 03:44:48 AM
You claim that Jl777 hasn't finished even the smallest projects in the last 6 years, I'd like to know which ones.
Thank you
You are right!Thank you
Because at that time you probably were not familiar with Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies!
TL;DR : James defined about dozens of crypto projects in year of 2014 and after that.
then he was created and offered assets for each project on NXT platform. After that, time passed and no progress was made in the projects. then these assets were undervalued and obliterated, and many investors were affected like me. after that the game has continued until today, by converting it's projects to each other and changing their names and goals.
If you are interested to know more, most documents are still available in this forum. Just search a little bit.
April 05, 2019, 03:40:41 AM
It's about EOS not bringing the TPS they promise.
Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
Please do not sophistry!Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
I know James since the launch of the BTCD and I was an investor in his several projects that never ended and now I don't have free time to worthless argue with you.
history exist to clarify these issues!!!
BTCD or BCD ?
Basically it was a stupid combination of failures. I use Windows 10 and tried to claim BTCP and BCD. Both with the Electrum version for their blockchains.
I used the same long password for different things - especially my password safe had the same pw as the DASH QT wallet. So after I started the Electrum clients (which I tested before with Defender, SuperAntiSpyware and www.virustotal.com) I had to do a little thing in DASHQT - that was it - the one of the wallets, most likely BCD, spied my password through a keylogger and the hacker had access to everything.
(there is no need to discuss the stupidity of using Win10, same passwords many times, storing 2FA codes in password safes or testing new software on a vulnerable system)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48476147
April 05, 2019, 03:16:14 AM
You claim that Jl777 hasn't finished even the smallest projects in the last 6 years, I'd like to know which ones.
Thank you
Thank you
April 05, 2019, 03:13:31 AM
It's about EOS not bringing the TPS they promise.
Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
Please do not sophistry!Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
I know James since the launch of the BTCD and I was an investor in his several projects that never ended and now I don't have free time to worthless argue with you.
history exist to clarify these issues!!!
April 05, 2019, 02:56:07 AM
Is sell going on? 
April 05, 2019, 02:51:01 AM
It's about EOS not bringing the TPS they promise.
Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
April 05, 2019, 02:44:16 AM
this requires trust in delegates, the exchanges is rarely trusted to them, so increased deposit time to 2 hours, only on the Hitbtc deposit in 6 minutes so. A high hashrate is preferable to trust. But many coins do not have a hashrate, but they are credited quickly, I do not understand the logic of exchanges. Why do bad coins without hashrate has a good grow but a good Komodo has bad grow? Why Komodo block in 1 minute, it is fit for neither Dex nor for shopping in the stores, why not do a hulf second like the EOS? Even 15 seconds of ETH is a lot for Dex, I think that's the only reason EOS is a leader. People otherwise understand the high speed of transactions, give them what they like
If you think the only difference between EOS and KMD is the time of new block generation, you have a big mistake. EOS is the most largest and most successful project in the history of cryptocurrencies up to now. EOS has earned more than $ 4 billion in the ICO, which serves the development of this huge platform, and this is the guarantor of the success of this popular platform. EOS is a well-designed and acclaimed platform which is the result of the experiences that Daniel Larimer has gained from its three previous successful projects. But KMD is made by the JL777 which could not been able to finish even one small project after six years of activity in the Crypto world.
April 05, 2019, 12:13:08 AM
why complicate everything, you can simply change the algorithm to one that is not on Nicehash, this will eliminate the possibility of attack 51, and in case of appear of always change again, and delegates will not be needed. The danger of the delegates is that they can attack for the purpose of imperceptible emission to themselves. Komodo is a best coin of all, but still imperfect yet
April 04, 2019, 08:10:13 PM
In the future when KMD MK is much larger than it is today NN candidates will look for ways to guarantee their spots over multiple years, and that will include things like competition with other NN candidates using incentives like revenue sharing, other token offerings, and discounts on various services and products offered by the NN business itself, as well as private deals with large holders.
I also hope in the future we see genuine community run nodes for small KMD holders to pool their VOTE.
I also hope in the future we see genuine community run nodes for small KMD holders to pool their VOTE.
jl777 said in discord he will not vote for any candidate that offers bribes to voters and he suggests everyone else do the same. You are right that when NN profits grow large competition between candidates will mean it is harder to get elected but the solution is community pool run nodes, not vote buying with % of rewards paid to voters. This year not many candidates so competition not so much.
April 04, 2019, 05:17:10 AM
"dPoW gives DLT projects the same security as bitcoin at a fraction of the cost, without adding any trusted third party, and without creating any centralized single point of failure"
That's a pretty good definition of what dPoW does, can you say how it does it in as many words?
KMD holders vote for 30 out of 64 notaries every year in a free and open election, the bottom 30 performers facing re-election. These 64 NN then form a separate peer-to-peer network from Komodo. 13 out of 64 notaries will then periodically notarize a blockchain hash from every supported blockchain onto the bitcoin blockchain. This then creates an anchor point or "checkpoint" for each secured blockchain that cannot be reversed.
April 04, 2019, 03:07:19 AM
this requires trust in delegates, the exchanges is rarely trusted to them, so increased deposit time to 2 hours, only on the Hitbtc deposit in 6 minutes so. A high hashrate is preferable to trust. But many coins do not have a hashrate, but they are credited quickly, I do not understand the logic of exchanges. Why do bad coins without hashrate has a good grow but a good Komodo has bad grow? Why Komodo block in 1 minute, it is fit for neither Dex nor for shopping in the stores, why not do a hulf second like the EOS? Even 15 seconds of ETH is a lot for Dex, I think that's the only reason EOS is a leader. People otherwise understand the high speed of transactions, give them what they like
April 04, 2019, 03:00:40 AM
"dPoW gives DLT projects the same security as bitcoin at a fraction of the cost, without adding any trusted third party, and without creating any centralized single point of failure"
That's a pretty good definition of what dPoW does, can you say how it does it in as many words?
April 04, 2019, 02:50:14 AM
Want a super crude and cheesy dpow definition without using the word stake (which is wrong): "Securing your project through Bitcoin's hashrate, because wasting resources is silliness" or "
ha ha ... you came up with slogans for Tether lol
thanks for the giggles, do you know what 'definition' means?
You can't explain dPoW in simple terms, can you? not a slogan, a simple explanation that makes someone understand
marketing is NOT just slogans, it's a simple message that people can understand
I'm not going to have a technical discussion with someone that does not know the difference between consensus algos. Just because you struggle with what dpow is does not mean I have to be the one to explain it to you. I'm comfortable with my investment, I've done my DD.
Also, as stated, I'm not a marketeer so you reading too much into a cheesy tagline shows me you fail to actually pull out content from posts well. You asked to describe what dpow was without using stake... in simplest terms with an albeit cheesy slogan, that's its selling point. For projects that lack the infrastructure to adequately protect their chain, for a relatively small price, they can prevent attack by periodic snapshots to the longest, most secure ledger in the world. While not backed up directly, we can say with the transitive property that they ultimately exist on the BTC ledger because the ultimate hash encompasses those chains. Finally, I wasn't aware that Tether secured blockchains from attack. Thanks for the info. /s
answer me this...
who benefits the most from mining kmd blocks?
there are only 64 positions to "own" the rights to notarize kmd transactions on the btc blockchain. and from my understanding, these 64 nn have a zero difficulty unlike those of us that use miners...that chaps my behind.
April 04, 2019, 02:46:33 AM
Also, as stated, I'm not a marketeer so you reading too much into a cheesy tagline shows me you fail to actually pull out content from posts well. You asked to describe what dpow was without using stake... in simplest terms with an albeit cheesy slogan, that's its selling point. For projects that lack the infrastructure to adequately protect their chain, for a relatively small price, they can prevent attack by periodic snapshots to the longest, most secure ledger in the world. While not backed up directly, we can say with the transitive property that they ultimately exist on the BTC ledger because the ultimate hash encompasses those chains. Finally, I wasn't aware that Tether secured blockchains from attack. Thanks for the info. /s
"dPoW gives DLT projects the same security as bitcoin at a fraction of the cost, without adding any trusted third party, and without creating any centralized single point of failure"
Jump to: