This concentration of wealth on a coin is nonsense. What is the difference between Liberty and Bitcoin and other alts that are dead now? I am one of the bagholder of alts that are 5 million in circulation and less than 1 litoshi in value. Now can you call that concentration of wealth. The value of the coin is in its usefulness, liquidity and community. If more people will use it, it will become more valuable. I can hardly imagine now, why Bitcoin have that immense value when it burns a lot of electricity to maintain its network and have 10 minute confirmation when proof of stake coins (POS) like Liberty can do 30 second transaction and without the need of mining. If you want to create value on this coin, build communities and businesses around it so it become useful. So people will demand the coin thereby justifying its value.
The wealth is only a perceived wealth, seperate from it's value.
Diamonds, outside of industry, have no practical value whatsoever, yet they remain deisrable because they have perceived rarity.
The strict control of how many diamonds are released onto the open market maintains the perception of rarity and value.
Only about 1% of all the jewelry diamonds mined make it to the public. The price is maintained by deliberately limitting the supply.
Ultimately, they are worthless - but people still see value in them because they are shiney.
https://mises.org/Econsense/ch91.asp The concentration of wealth with altcoins is the same as they are fundamentally useless, but their perceived value is based on limitting the supply to control market value.
It is not how much a particular coin is worth, it is how they are distributed and who controls the movement of flow.
Any coin where large proportions are held in very few hands means that the owners of those coins can control supply and try to increase demand, thereby increasing prices and perceived value. This is a cartel, no different to diamonds or the privately run banks.
It doesn't matter if a coin is worth 1 cent or 100 dollars - it's just managed perception.
If, for example, 60% of all coins or more are held in 10 accounts or less, you have a cartel-type structure, not the free movement of money. The concentration of a given resource is in the hands of a small number of people.
Satoshi, in creating a methodology for everyone, wanted to do away with cartels and strict control of supply.
That no longer exists in cryptos. They are being run, knowingly or unknowingly, by cartels - and investors are at their mercy.
It's our money they are taking. And they laugh all the way to the next coin.
Don't blame the coins, blame the mechanism they are all built on and the persuit of greed over fairness.