Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 1883. (Read 3074324 times)

thanks

c-cex is not a major exchange and i wouldn't recommended anyone to leave any coin in there. it is simple, c-cex is garbage.

anyone interested in becoming a Lisk delegate here is a simple step by step instructional link for Windows  https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-use-ssh-keys-with-putty-on-digitalocean-droplets-windows-users

Oh, so basically you're just butthurt because you lost money on obvious scams?

Lots of hacking?  Another oblivious moron.

You can all feel free to review my history, you'll see I'm no c-cex shill and just like to call out ignorant morons like the one above.

ok for the past year they have had ZERO bruteforce protection. no  "tried password too many times" lockout or nothing
heres another
they disabled sms verify because its been broken for months. recently changed to google auth because of it
so ya, lots of hacking goes on there, NOT TO MENTION THEY MAKE DEALS WITH SCAM DEVS TO KEEP FUNDS
need more? o wait, your a mindless shill for that place, your post history says so ;p

Uneducated troll...please point to any technical issues c-cex has not resolved.  Or as usual, are you just pulling bullshit out of your ass because they have ICO's?

c-cex is not a major exchange and i wouldn't recommended anyone to leave any coin in there. it is simple, c-cex is garbage.

wow.

with all good news, I think Lisk will soon hit the major exchange, such as C-Cex.

The key reason for only 101 delegates is to support the 10 second Lisk blocktime.  The more delegates there are, the more coordination messages you need between them in a given period of time - and it's not linear growth we're talking about here.  Crypti had a grand experiment called "Proof of Time" (PoT) whose goal was to coordinate large to infinite numbers of support nodes in a very short blocktime.   This PoT experiment failed.  When DPoS was grafted into Crypti, the 101 delegates worldwide were deemed the right number to support round-robin block addition every 10 seconds, based on the PoT experience.  Lisk has inherited this hard-won knowledge.

As for "gaining control of over half of them"...The only way to assure this doesn't happen is to verify people are who they say they are as they trickle in slowly one by one to join the testnet.  I'm doing this right now, documenting their ID credentials and performance in a spreadsheet for all to see after launch.  

That's why it's so important to be a Active Delegate on the test net NOW if you want to be an Active Delegate on the main net LATER.  I am betting there will be 1000+ people who will click the button in the Lisk client to become "Standby Delegates" within 24 hours after launch.  Most of them have no idea that they ALSO need to go off to rent a cloud server and set up totally different Lisk software to run a Delegate node.  How will you pick who to vote for out of that mob?  You won't.  You'll go to a spreadsheet I'm making of the people who have already proven they can do the job of an Active Delegate and have already been vetted to be individuals and not sock puppets.  

And you'll vote for the people in this spreadsheet.  The Team.

Wait until this time next week after launch, you'll understand what I'm talking about.  

Joining this great question. I also think that 101 delegates is way too little and it'll be quite possible to gain control over half of them. Where this number came from? What is the reasoning?