Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 2069. (Read 3074169 times)
March 19, 2016, 08:12:39 AM
WTS 10 Lisk at $100 usd each.
March 19, 2016, 08:12:15 AM
Where can i find informations about the legal statut of Lisk?
it is a non-profit association?
a company?
individuals receiving donations?
thanks
it is a non-profit association?
a company?
individuals receiving donations?
thanks
Max has already conceded that there is no incorporated entity yet.
At this time it is Max, Axel Hellinger (a German lawyer), and Paul Klanscheck (of Coinimal but acting in a personal capacity) who control the funds on a 2 of 3 vote to release. Oliver has no technical involvement in releasing funds. Not sure why that is. There is no CFO.
In essence at the moment it is individuals receiving donations.
There is risk in Lisk, but if they were to misappropriate funds there would be legal and other consequences regardless of the wording of the Agreement. Would anyone ever consider touching Mark Karpeles again?
March 19, 2016, 08:10:30 AM
Well,surely there is the address with all those bitcoins invested.
Where is the address to check all transactions?
Or there is something "hidden"?
Maybe some cold storage that noone could see.....
I remember eth there were 1 address with 30k btc invested.
All pubblic, all at sunlight. Nothin hidden.
Same here?
Where is the address to check all transactions?
Or there is something "hidden"?
Maybe some cold storage that noone could see.....
I remember eth there were 1 address with 30k btc invested.
All pubblic, all at sunlight. Nothin hidden.
Same here?
March 19, 2016, 08:00:34 AM
No way 8+k bitcoin was invested in this project by different users, i believe a large portion is from devs themselves.
You can't prove it either way so your point is moot...
-tb-
It's an endless fight. That will have only one winner, the one that was right.
March 19, 2016, 07:58:31 AM
No way 8+k bitcoin was invested in this project by different users, i believe a large portion is from devs themselves.
You can't prove it either way so your point is moot...
-tb-
March 19, 2016, 07:58:13 AM
No way 8+k bitcoin was invested in this project by different users, i believe a large portion is from devs themselves.
What if it was?
admission?
And then there are people like you that own nothing.
And when I say nothing I mean nothing to proof what are you saying, so dev can't admit anything since you can't proof the anything.
March 19, 2016, 07:56:35 AM
Where can i find informations about the legal statut of Lisk?
it is a non-profit association?
a company?
individuals receiving donations?
thanks
it is a non-profit association?
a company?
individuals receiving donations?
thanks
March 19, 2016, 07:55:25 AM
No way 8+k bitcoin was invested in this project by different users, i believe a large portion is from devs themselves.
What if it was?
admission?
No, not knowing, just like you.
But again, what if the developers invested in their own project?
March 19, 2016, 07:53:53 AM
No way 8+k bitcoin was invested in this project by different users, i believe a large portion is from devs themselves.
What if it was?
admission?
March 19, 2016, 07:45:57 AM
No way 8+k bitcoin was invested in this project by different users, i believe a large portion is from devs themselves.
What if it was?
March 19, 2016, 07:45:24 AM
No way 8+k bitcoin was invested in this project by different users, i believe a large portion is from devs themselves.
March 19, 2016, 07:43:35 AM
How do we know the BTC isn't reinvested by the people running the ICO?
We'd like to see the address that holds all the BTC from the ICO and to make sure none of that BTC is being reinvested in itself.
We'd like to see the address that holds all the BTC from the ICO and to make sure none of that BTC is being reinvested in itself.
We?
You...
You can exclude yourself from wanting to know details. However there are plenty of others that would feel more comfortable to see where it is and how it's used. That said - they just responded that it is in cold storage until it gets out of escrow. It'll be interesting.
The devs could have also just borrowed a few thousand BTC for the ICO then they overpay/overspend themselves following year and pay-back the loan. Easy way to own 50% of the company for free
March 19, 2016, 07:40:33 AM
How do we know the BTC isn't reinvested by the people running the ICO?
We'd like to see the address that holds all the BTC from the ICO and to make sure none of that BTC is being reinvested in itself.
We'd like to see the address that holds all the BTC from the ICO and to make sure none of that BTC is being reinvested in itself.
We?
You...
You can exclude yourself from wanting to know details. However there are plenty of others that would feel more comfortable to see where it is and how it's used. That said - they just responded that it is in cold storage until it gets out of escrow. It'll be interesting.
The devs could have also just borrowed a few thousand BTC for the ICO then they overpay/overspend themselves following year and pay-back the loan. Easy way to own 50% of the company for free
March 19, 2016, 07:38:20 AM
Why are you using the word "investors" guys? Donators is the word.
You think you bought shares or it's investment or something
You think you bought shares or it's investment or something
March 19, 2016, 07:36:15 AM
Why ask?
There are 2 scenario's that could happen if they want to scam us:
- the coins are in hands of the Lisk team and they run away after the ICO
- the coins are in hands of the escrow/Coinbase and they could still run away after the ICO
I go for scenario 3:
- everything is fine, you get your Lisk and Lisk moves to the exchanges, development continues
Because the Lisk team also holds a nice amount of Lisk, they have enough incentive to make it successful.
March 19, 2016, 07:18:39 AM
Because it is in cold storage controlled by Coinbase. It is also in a vault, which is locked by an escrow (allegedly).
March 19, 2016, 07:18:31 AM
I won't bore you all with the nitty gritty details but due to the technical failings of Wankfest (aka Coinbase) it seems i will be unable to access any more of my bitcoin stored there before the ICO closes.
As i don't leave much fiat in exchanges and it's now the weekend that route to buying more BTC is also closed off to me before the ICO closes.
Any recommendations as to how and where i can buy and access BTC before the ICO closes?
As i don't leave much fiat in exchanges and it's now the weekend that route to buying more BTC is also closed off to me before the ICO closes.
Any recommendations as to how and where i can buy and access BTC before the ICO closes?
March 19, 2016, 07:16:54 AM
after 1 year.....
1. bitcoin
2. Ethereum
3. Lisk
4. bla bla bla
5. bla bla bla
1. bitcoin
2. Ethereum
3. Lisk
4. bla bla bla
5. bla bla bla
We should talk also about augur .... augur is more interesting that lisk (just my personal opinion, from a technic point of view).
Right, but augur is a decentralized app, Lisk is a platform.. We can make many Augurs with Lisk
March 19, 2016, 07:14:43 AM
March 19, 2016, 07:13:33 AM
How do we know the BTC isn't reinvested by the people running the ICO?
We'd like to see the address that holds all the BTC from the ICO and to make sure none of that BTC is being reinvested in itself.
We'd like to see the address that holds all the BTC from the ICO and to make sure none of that BTC is being reinvested in itself.
We?
You...
You can exclude yourself from wanting to know details. However there are plenty of others that would feel more comfortable to see where it is and how it's used. That said - they just responded that it is in cold storage until it gets out of escrow. It'll be interesting.
I don't get it either. One of investors tracked down his transaction to an address with 3000 BTC the last time I checked. Why devs can't provide all addresses with ICO money?
Jump to: