Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 2167. (Read 3074169 times)

Did anyone track their money and find ICO bitcoin address? Can anyone confirm that over 1000 btc was invested? I've been offline for the last two weeks and as far as I understand Lisk team doesn't give any proof. Or am I wrong?

No changes 

I used gimp with the Airbrush tool.

Any updates on bter status?
Soppurt tickets can take there over a week....

I love how you think Mal. Scientific.

You make a very valid point in addressing latency and ways to figure out how to maximize the network. It could very well be the start of peer reviewed research for Lisk.

In my opinion though, there are some potential issues with the proposal that will need to be addressed to move forward with this:

• Guidance - Right now Olivier and Max have their full attention on Lisk, they would have to hire someone to guide the project and report findings.
• Time Sink - IF Lisk decides to test this themselves, it would inevitably distract them from Lisk core development, causing a rift in time management.
• Funding - They would need to address how much they are willing to spend on the project, and if it is worth it.

With this in mind, I can see how testing it in different IP's might be an issue, as there would be no control group. But, we might as well try (it's free, doesn't need guidance and would not distract core development) since the community is one hell of a resource.

Oh, by the way, this post is not meant to start a discussion whether it can or cannot be done. I highly believe it CAN be done, once the potential issues (and maybe others I've missed) have been addressed.

Testing latencies as a community scattered around in an uncontrolled worldwide environment is very inefficient.   I fear such efforts will not give us the answers we need.

Once the Lisk mainchain is running, I would strongly recommend setting up a closed cluster of 16 Pi2s connected by Ethernet, all running the guestbook dapp among themselves as a Lisk sidechain.  Sixteen Pi2s is the maximum number of sidechain support nodes allowed by 0.5.5 if I remember the Crypti conversations correctly.  You could throw this whole cluster together for around $1000, maybe even run it as a Lisk-sponsored thesis project in the Aachen university environment.  

Once this test cluster is up and running, the next step is to start putting known test latency delays between the nodes, slowly increasing these delays until the sidechain delegate network finally fails.   Lots of valuable scenarios could be examined and documented in a whitepaper.  There's lots of software that is used for network testing of this sort, and even people who specialize in doing such test setups.  Maybe you could hire them as a consultant if there is no interest in doing it as an Aachen area engineering project.  See as an introduction:

http://bencane.com/2012/07/16/tc-adding-simulated-network-latency-to-your-linux-server/

http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netem

http://wanem.sourceforge.net/

http://www.trafficsqueezer.org/

Max, controlled testing like I am proposing here would provide vital information required to convince and sell major businesses into running enterprise dapps on Lisk side chains.  These tests would show Lisk is a serious player on par with Ethereum, willing to prove our performance claims with hard facts and proven numbers on bare metal hardware.  This kind of Pi2 cluster research would be relatively cheap.  You have the financial resources now to easily do such testing.   Having a Lisk sidechain engineering test bed like this would be an invaluable resource.  The photos alone of such a testbed for use in Lisk public relations would be a justifiable advertising expense if nothing else.  I  urge you to delegate this task to some local engineering student whose progress you can easily monitor.  Have them set up such a testbed as soon as possible, so testing can begin as soon as the Lisk mainchain starts.

Ha.  Here's somebody coming at you with a crazy idea on how to spend some of that new Lisk development money you now control.  Use me as a test case on learning how to handle such fools!

You might have been missed when Max was collecting the names for the signature.

On another note, it could also mean you didn't have the signature active on the first two weeks. But that would infer you're lying to the Lisk team... YOU'RE NOT LYING NOW, ARE YOUUU!!!??

Open a support ticket mentioning this, display any proof regarding your signature being active the first 2 weeks. If you don't have any, just display your replies on the first and second week and forward them to support.

I don't see this as being a big issue to be honest, don't worry about it too much it'll get resolve.

What does it mean to see my username only on the far right column, the only column that isn't labeled.  I didn't see my user name on the week1, week2, and week3 column but I did took park on the signature campaigns since the very first day on the 24H period.  I have been displaying the signature since everyday.  Is there anything wrong?

a poker or gambling coin is not the same as lisk.  You should consider bringing lisk into your life.

That and those stories are from freakin 2014.

Thanks for the advice.

What screenshot software did you take that with?

I like the gradual fade to the whited out areas in it.

Thanks, looking forward to it!

Oh wow, that is awesome! I love how this coin is being spread wider and wider! It will equal into a better and fairer distribution of the coins!

ps. working on the swedish translation now

like i said few pages before, try to get all currencys out of there. bter seems having same problems like cryptsy had before shutdown.

very good idea. someone's gonna pick this up? efforts will be apreciated by all of us due to more attention and use of lisk.

Will your venture be Fully Licensed and Regulated like BreakoutGaming?
http://calvinayre.com/2015/01/13/business/interview-with-gian-perroni-on-break-out-gaming/

Also note that Breakout Gaming is backed by real life Poker celebirities like Johnny Chan, Huck Seed, Jennifer Harman, Ted Forrest, Todd Brunson, David Benyamine, Layne Flack, Toto Leonidas, Jeffrey Lisandro and Vladimir Shchemelev, etc:
http://www.pokerlistings.com/chan-brunson-headline-new-alt-currency-poker-site-breakout-gaming-39373
http://www.pokersites.com/news/johnny-chan-backs-bitcoin-poker-site-2743

You should join the BreakoutCoin chat on Slack: https://brocoin.slack.com perhaps you can collaborate with them.

It's back online.




Lisk Country Ambassadors Initiative

Lisk has fans world-wide who are interested in the idea of decentralised applications and custom blockchains. To strengthen the bond between the Lisk core team and local communities in different countries we have created the country ambassadors initiative.



Get all information on our blog

Web Wallet is down  

We will have to do this as a community. I will try it from the office and from home. Then take the latencies to different IPs and post them. If we all do this, we should find a minimum.



Version 0.5.5.



No, if we are talking about latencies we are talking about milli seconds here. It doesn't make a difference if we have 10 second blocks or 60 second blocks.

Currently our blockchain database is 807MB big, after 2,234,777 blocks. That means every block is on average (approximately!) 0.000361MB or 361bytes big. About 3,000,000 blocks are 1 year. That means our blockchain will probably grow to about 1,5GB-2GB in the first year, due to more volume at Lisk. This is absolutely OK. Even 3GB would be OK.

We just bring the blockchain bloat problem at Ethereum, because imagine there are 10,000 dapps. That wouldn't be possible in my opinion right now. However, at Lisk this wouldn't change a thing, because of the sidechains.

Additionally, changing the 10 second block time is not 1 change of code. It would require heavy testing. So in conclusion, we won't change the 10 second block time which is only beneficial for users and devs.



We haven't released the client yet. We will release the full client right at launch or very soon after that.



I will write another support ticket in a few minutes!



Exactly!



Hah! Absolutely not. If the price of 1 LISK grows that high, we would obviously release an update which reduces the fees back to older levels.

Imagine a percentage fee of 0.1% as it was before. The more money you want to transfer, the more you have to pay for the transaction. Let's say you want to transact 10,000 LISK at the price of 10 USD as "Dwr" forcast. Then you would have to pay 100 USD transaction fee. However, with our (current!) constant fee you would have to pay 10 USD, most probably at this level we would have reduced it to 0.001 LISK, i.e. 1ct.



What do you mean?

the signature of members is not available?

My team DraftForge is also doing this and has been for a while without an ICO haha. We might also incorporate LISK in it soon