I just don't get it, and his attitude is pissing me off. It's against common sense. If it took someone 12 days to earn 5.38 lisk, then it makes sense that it will take a bit less than double that time to make at least 10 lisk to reach the threshold. That would be day 23-24, yet he is accusing me of scamming on day 25.
Ok, it made sense. Yep, I waited another 2x days for it. Then I didn't get anything. That's why I asked you.
Maybe I should run a script checking his pool's outgoing transactions, see if they mach up with vote weights, math doesn't seem to be his strong suit.
Sure, welcome. I made payout twice every months depend on their weight (with 0.1 fee). There is no minimum amount like 5 lsk, 10lsk. It is rule from pool start forging. It is so much clear. Also I have transparency report you can check. My delegate more act like token distribution than pool.
Maybe he's fudding you so people will unvote but anyway, I removed his pool link from my list and added yours.
https://lisk.cryptopools.com
-tb-
Hey, techbyte, I am pool fun and I like seeing more pools in top 101. No wayto fud him. I just ask as a voter. I also voted for ur delegate. Already got payment twice. And your pool is only 50% but I already got around 6lsk in 10 days. Other side, I am pending 10lsk form May 1. What do you think about this?
Questioning the pool as a scam is not asking. You could have just ask him to lower the threshold. But waiting a bit longer to get your lisk is not so bad either. Btw, thanks for the support.
-tb-