If i am interpreting that little comparison correctly they not even just compared the two, they also made the point that Lisk is superior to Ethereum.
Of course you will deny that, but as someone who was around one year ago i remember very lively the vibe that surrounded our little flyer here. It was posted like 100x a day with the overall attitude that Ethereum better go and hide cause now Lisk is coming.
Edit: Otherwise, just to show that your own little project is inferior, posting such a flyer wouldnt make any sense at all. You dont post stuff like that to show that you are inferior, you obv post it to argue that you are better.
Most of these statements to ETH last year came from users and not from the Lisk team.
Some translated ARK threads have the same comparison, only added with ARK
But i am sure he never intended to be compared to Ethereum.
Seriously, there comes a point where you have to accept failures. You are writing here day in day out to bark away even the slightest critic or doubt. Sometimes i ask myself if you got funded to do so or if you are just overinvested and not able to admit defeat.
A comparison serves to find similarities and differences.
But a comparison is not an equality!
Do you want to go further on the topic?
So for me, this is not a failure.
Secondly 70% of the post of the last days are not a criticism but a stupid FUD. Right, I'll go against.
And no, I will not pay for it. Want to have my Lisk address. Are you paranoid? Then you are wrong in forums.
Of course I can discuss with users who are also interested and act with facts as well as reasonably argue.
But this definitely does not belong to what users wrote here in June to ETH, that is too stupid for me, because this is nonsense.