Is there any informaiton paid on the salaries to developers, specifically the salaries they pay themselves?
no. it's a closed book. they have chosen a structure that gives you no option but to trust them. it didn't need to be that way.
Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 396. (Read 3074142 times)
March 02, 2017, 03:33:21 PM
no. it's a closed book. they have chosen a structure that gives you no option but to trust them. it didn't need to be that way.
March 02, 2017, 03:33:12 PM
A transparency report should really include salary paid information.
A financial statement is all that is legally required: https://blog.lisk.io/financial-report-january-2017-efb54d1cfad1#.p0v7ksdx0
Are you comfortable to publish your monthly salary? If not why would you pretend others to publish it?
March 02, 2017, 03:17:09 PM
A transparency report should really include salary paid information.
March 02, 2017, 03:02:47 PM
Is there any informaiton paid on the salaries to developers, specifically the salaries they pay themselves?
No.
But from january the Lisk Foundation publishes a monthly Transparency Report.
There you will find all costs and expenses.
If you want to know personal things, please ask Max directly.
March 02, 2017, 02:52:22 PM
Is there any informaiton paid on the salaries to developers, specifically the salaries they pay themselves?
March 02, 2017, 02:49:05 PM
Max and Oliver stated during the ICO that their motivation to fork Crypti was the unacceptably slow rate of progress of that project, that it was taking far too long to get to the market, and that they were deeply frustrated by it. That is what really hacks me off about their conduct with Lisk, a project that will clearly take even longer to reach the market than Crypti.
During the ICO?
Olivier and Max leave Crypti to establish Lisk! - January 30, 2016
Welcome to Lisk. This is us. - February 1, 2016
If you've read that then you'll know there were several reasons for Max and Oliver to establish Lisk
are you a native English speaker?
March 02, 2017, 02:42:12 PM
Max and Oliver stated during the ICO that their motivation to fork Crypti was the unacceptably slow rate of progress of that project, that it was taking far too long to get to the market, and that they were deeply frustrated by it. That is what really hacks me off about their conduct with Lisk, a project that will clearly take even longer to reach the market than Crypti.
During the ICO?
Olivier and Max leave Crypti to establish Lisk! - January 30, 2016
Welcome to Lisk. This is us. - February 1, 2016
If you've read that then you'll know there were several reasons for Max and Oliver to establish Lisk
March 02, 2017, 02:22:57 PM
The Future is Bright for Lisk
Last night, one of our advisors officially resigned from his position on the Board of Advisors for the Lisk Foundation. We (Max and Oliver) would like to begin this post by thanking our former advisor, Charles Hoskinson, for the sage advice and counsel he provided us over these past few months.
We would like to also use this opportunity to update the community on the positive relationship between Lisk and its Board of Advisors, an important circle of influencers and leaders who will continue to provide us with wisdom and experience.
Our views on advisors
We believe there are two types of advisors: active and passive. Active advisors constantly contact the management board and advise as they see fit. Passive advisors wait until the management board asks for advice, for the time being they therefore stay silent. We are lucky to have advisors who have taken an active role in providing us with counsel, even during the times when we made a conscious decision to go in a different direction.
...
Read the complete blog article
RT: https://twitter.com/LiskHQ/status/837238317074743296
Thanks
March 02, 2017, 01:50:08 PM
Max and Oliver stated during the ICO that their motivation to fork Crypti was the unacceptably slow rate of progress of that project, that it was taking far too long to get to the market, and that they were deeply frustrated by it. That is what really hacks me off about their conduct with Lisk, a project that will clearly take even longer to reach the market than Crypti.
I'll just leave this link here for you, no other words are necessary.
https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk
were you elected, or self appointed?
March 02, 2017, 01:45:04 PM
Max and Oliver stated during the ICO that their motivation to fork Crypti was the unacceptably slow rate of progress of that project, that it was taking far too long to get to the market, and that they were deeply frustrated by it. That is what really hacks me off about their conduct with Lisk, a project that will clearly take even longer to reach the market than Crypti.
I'll just leave this link here for you, no other words are necessary.
https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk
March 02, 2017, 01:26:23 PM
More than 8 days to place your bet 
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18039111
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18039111
LuckyLisk draw #1 - 11-Mar-2017
Place your bets before countdown ends
March 02, 2017, 01:20:47 PM
Max and Oliver stated during the ICO that their motivation to fork Crypti was the unacceptably slow rate of progress of that project, that it was taking far too long to get to the market, and that they were deeply frustrated by it. That is what really hacks me off about their conduct with Lisk, a project that will clearly take even longer to reach the market than Crypti.
Unfortunately, they did not repeat the findings and history.
And this time do not interfere - there is a lot of money, more than is necessary.
But these people do not understand that the world is more valuable than time cryptocurrency money and ideality code.
All investors are now in the wild cons and all that is left is to wait or to fix the damage.
March 02, 2017, 01:12:34 PM
L&G! Vote for this two pools and move them to active delegates!
1. Rank #103, liskpool_com_03, 13172488030862361147L, 85% Reward, 6.66% approval
http://www.liskpool.com/
2. Rank #105, olejegcord, 11720389439153169560L, 75% Reward, 6.33% approval
https://adlisk.pro/
"this pool will proportionally share 75% of forged blocks revenue to people who voted,
the rest will be kept for "the development of the game on the platform LISK""
They need about 50k for first and about 500k for second lisk votes to move to active delegates.
If you have 100k lisks and vote for pool with 7% approval, you will receive about 180 LSK reward every month for one pool
(if my math is correct).
You can vote up to 33 delegates per transaction. It's only 1 LSK cost.
I don't affiliated with any pools or delegates (with the exception of my votes for them)
1. Rank #103, liskpool_com_03, 13172488030862361147L, 85% Reward, 6.66% approval
http://www.liskpool.com/
2. Rank #105, olejegcord, 11720389439153169560L, 75% Reward, 6.33% approval
https://adlisk.pro/
"this pool will proportionally share 75% of forged blocks revenue to people who voted,
the rest will be kept for "the development of the game on the platform LISK""
They need about 50k for first and about 500k for second lisk votes to move to active delegates.
If you have 100k lisks and vote for pool with 7% approval, you will receive about 180 LSK reward every month for one pool
(if my math is correct).
You can vote up to 33 delegates per transaction. It's only 1 LSK cost.
I don't affiliated with any pools or delegates (with the exception of my votes for them)
I agree with you, and I support the voting for these pools.
Liskpool_com_03 already in top, only to vote for the delegate of olejegcord, Rank # 105.
March 02, 2017, 01:10:23 PM
Polo may be a reason why lisk so much fall
during last moonth.
They need days to process withdrawalls and people
trying to get out with btc during this bouble.
during last moonth.
They need days to process withdrawalls and people
trying to get out with btc during this bouble.
March 02, 2017, 01:10:23 PM
I deleted my offer to you @ Calabi-Yau Manifold. It makes no sense. You two Noobs are sitting on a too low level ... and now on my IgnoreList.
This was really a waste of time.
2 Noobs? Nope. You are the NOOB, bagholding worthless Lisk with no idea that you are hyping fail project...
Read about Crypti. Good luck.
March 02, 2017, 01:01:16 PM
If a company holds assets totalling < 13000btc how can it be valued > 8200btc? Am I an idiot or is everyone else an idiot?
Yes you're an idiot.... read the latest financial statement before posting total non sense.
https://blog.lisk.io/financial-report-january-2017-efb54d1cfad1#.lwdtr9t0n
March 02, 2017, 01:00:58 PM
bullshit
+1
Crypto is amazing. He is defending those lazy guys who are repeating path from Crypti-fail like they are paying him for that. He is doing it just for free. Only because he is bagholder and want to "save investment" (in his dreams) by telling people that everything with Lisk is OK LOL.
Perfect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndromeI deleted my offer to you @ Calabi-Yau Manifold. It makes no sense. You two Noobs are sitting on a too low level ... and now on my IgnoreList.
This was really a waste of time with this children's club
March 02, 2017, 12:57:35 PM
Kordek with friends sleeping on 10k? 14k? BTC and lack of progress and serious development in Lisk leading to "Asshole" and "SCAM" words very easy.
People who write something like this have no manners. And in reality they are selfless little assholes, sorry this is my opinion.
Kordek took so much BTC for project and cannot develop Lisk properly.
He is wasting 2nd time (first was Crypti!) people's money, faith, time, and you are talking about manners?
OMG I see something like Stockholm syndrome. Rare in crypto, mostly in bagholders denial.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
WAKE UP, you are wasting energy with Lisk. There're many better projects to be part of it as a investor, trader, coder or pr guy.
It's really sad, you must wake up, Lisk is not good, Lisk is fail for now... Maybe will reborn like phoenix but don't bet on that too easy...
"Stockholm syndrome" - it has that feeling about it. The fund is so large that they have become mesmerised by it, and possibly corrupted in their thinking by it.
March 02, 2017, 12:49:33 PM
I see a lot of bottom for lisk, hope this one is the last one 
ore it's doomed
ore it's doomedLisk has the same functionality with crypti, Crypti had a market cap of $500,000. That would put Lisk at 400 sat.
March 02, 2017, 12:48:55 PM
Max and Oliver stated during the ICO that their motivation to fork Crypti was the unacceptably slow rate of progress of that project, that it was taking far too long to get to the market, and that they were deeply frustrated by it. That is what really hacks me off about their conduct with Lisk, a project that will clearly take even longer to reach the market than Crypti.
Jump to: