[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 403.

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Quote from: Medow on March 01, 2017, 03:23:29 PM

Quote from: taurados on March 01, 2017, 03:19:57 PM

Where is max's Statement? IT is 9pm and working hours are over sinCe 5-6pm

Like everything else it will be ready when he is finished with his hookers and blow. Or maybe a month or two after. LISK is dying.

Oh @Medow "hookers and blow"... What's going on in your head, just porn and rubbish?

Medow

sr. member

Activity: 357

Merit: 250

Quote from: taurados on March 01, 2017, 03:19:57 PM

Where is max's Statement? IT is 9pm and working hours are over sinCe 5-6pm

Like everything else it will be ready when he is finished with his hookers and blow. Or maybe a month or two after. LISK is dying.

taurados

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 508

Where is max's Statement? IT is 9pm and working hours are over sinCe 5-6pm

Undermood

legendary

Activity: 950

Merit: 1000

Quote from: s0nix on March 01, 2017, 03:07:54 PM

Quote from: Undermood on March 01, 2017, 02:58:43 PM

Quote from: Grumlin on March 01, 2017, 02:07:24 PM

Hello!

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

You could talk to the team your ideas. I think your polls are meaningless. I remember in the community the team may change DPOS or increase the number of delegate after the relaunch of SDK

Here are some ideas: https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/353

Much better I think.

And what Grumlin does with it now: the installation of six new pools, not more.
A paradoxical thought would be. People vote "disable_reward" in the top 101 and get rewards.

Thanks for the link! I am reading them now.

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Quote from: Undermood on March 01, 2017, 02:58:43 PM

Quote from: Grumlin on March 01, 2017, 02:07:24 PM

Hello!

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

You could talk to the team your ideas. I think your polls are meaningless. I remember in the community the team may change DPOS or increase the number of delegate after the relaunch of SDK

Here are some ideas: https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/353

Much better I think.

And what Grumlin does with it now: the installation of six new pools, not more.
A paradoxical thought would be. People vote "disable_reward" in the top 101 and get rewards.

Calabi–Yau Manifold

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: s0nix on March 01, 2017, 02:39:49 PM

.............

You must be high-class bagholder, don't you...? So angry each time people telling "bad" truth about Lisk...

Undermood

legendary

Activity: 950

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Grumlin on March 01, 2017, 02:07:24 PM

Hello!

TAKE PART IN IMPORTANT SURVEY!

There was already a lot of debate about the situation with forging rewards, so I decided to run a poll with completely transparent voting process and counterfeit-proof results!
And since Lisk doesn't have such functionality yet, I've registered 6 new delegates, so now you can cast your vote simply by voting for a desired delegate!

By doing this I want to get a glimpse of the the real mood in the Lisk community. And nobody will have even the potential ability to counterfeit the results! Not even Max & Oliver!

So, there are 6 delegates and by voting for one or another, you acknowledge that:

4_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 4 LSK per block;
3_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 3 LSK per block;
2_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 2 LSK per block;
1_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 1 LSK per block;
disable_reward: you are supporting the option to cancel forging rewards completely;
change_pos: you are supporting the option to change DPoS algorithm for any other POS option.

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

You could talk to the team your ideas. I think your polls are meaningless. I remember in the community the team may change DPOS or increase the number of delegate after the relaunch of SDK

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Quote from: GinnaGinna on March 01, 2017, 02:43:22 PM

Quote from: s0nix on March 01, 2017, 02:39:49 PM

Quote from: GinnaGinna on March 01, 2017, 02:36:54 PM

Next stop 5k around mid. March Grin

Then comes your chance.
I'm sure you're waiting for it.
Otherwise you would not write here.

NO.
Im waiting 1. April to buy @ 2k. Cheesy

I do not think so, but anyway.
That also means, your statement yesterday Lisk is a shitcoin was not the truth.
Because you would buy a shitcoin. (apart from cv2) Wink

You've recognized the great potential of Lisk for the future, congratulations.

GinnaGinna

member

Activity: 102

Merit: 10

1Ky4J71zErbR3J1BhDWPJ7F7wL1zGusPzW

Quote from: s0nix on March 01, 2017, 02:39:49 PM

Quote from: GinnaGinna on March 01, 2017, 02:36:54 PM

Next stop 5k around mid. March Grin

Then comes your chance.
I'm sure you're waiting for it.
Otherwise you would not write here.

NO.
Im waiting 1. April to buy @ 2k. Cheesy

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Quote from: GinnaGinna on March 01, 2017, 02:36:54 PM

Next stop 5k around mid. March Grin

Then comes your chance.
I'm sure you're waiting for it.
Otherwise you would not write here.

GinnaGinna

member

Activity: 102

Merit: 10

1Ky4J71zErbR3J1BhDWPJ7F7wL1zGusPzW

Next stop 5k around mid. March Grin

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Quote from: Bitdonator on March 01, 2017, 02:23:38 PM

Its best to disable reward since Lisk have infinity supply Sad

I am not a delegate.
But I don't think that the present delegates would advocate this.

Also for some time the Lisk team and the community discounted about changes to the DPoS.

https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/issues/353

sofu

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1085

Degenerate Crypto Gambler

Quote from: sofu on February 22, 2017, 10:27:26 AM

Quote from: aaronjobs on February 22, 2017, 10:12:41 AM

why the price just go down and down? I bought LISK at 0.00044000BTC, and now It is 0.00011000BTC!!!

Sell now and buy back at 5-8k and double you LSK Grin

Don't mess with the dump bot

Update

Bitdonator

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Grumlin on March 01, 2017, 02:07:24 PM

Hello!

TAKE PART IN IMPORTANT SURVEY!

There was already a lot of debate about the situation with forging rewards, so I decided to run a poll with completely transparent voting process and counterfeit-proof results!
And since Lisk doesn't have such functionality yet, I've registered 6 new delegates, so now you can cast your vote simply by voting for a desired delegate!

By doing this I want to get a glimpse of the the real mood in the Lisk community. And nobody will have even the potential ability to counterfeit the results! Not even Max & Oliver!

So, there are 6 delegates and by voting for one or another, you acknowledge that:

4_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 4 LSK per block;
3_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 3 LSK per block;
2_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 2 LSK per block;
1_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 1 LSK per block;
disable_reward: you are supporting the option to cancel forging rewards completely;
change_pos: you are supporting the option to change DPoS algorithm for any other POS option.

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

Its best to disable reward since Lisk have infinity supply Sad

Thereisnospoon

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

BIG AIRDROP: t.me/otppaychat

Quote from: LiskHQ on March 01, 2017, 02:38:49 AM

Quote from: nyanhtet on March 01, 2017, 01:50:31 AM

Quote from: charleshoskinson on February 28, 2017, 06:41:28 PM

https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

How do you think about it, Max? You need to respond it. And need to edit lisk.io Undecided

We are issuing an official statement today.

Max,if you are real man and you genuinely care about your project you need to come up with some sort of statement at some point and not about Charles, what you've failed to do today, but about your concrete plans of development, preferably with a new road map and some time frame.
I know in crypto you can get away with everything but it is always better to finish your quest in a honourable way rather then giving up or hiding in a cave-in crypto live is short and live is full of black swans... Wink

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

I for a short time had seen his other account Grin

Grumlin

legendary

Activity: 2893

Merit: 1158

Hello!

TAKE PART IN IMPORTANT SURVEY!

There was already a lot of debate about the situation with forging rewards, so I decided to run a poll with completely transparent voting process and counterfeit-proof results!
And since Lisk doesn't have such functionality yet, I've registered 6 new delegates, so now you can cast your vote simply by voting for a desired delegate!

By doing this I want to get a glimpse of the the real mood in the Lisk community. And nobody will have even the potential ability to counterfeit the results! Not even Max & Oliver!

So, there are 6 delegates and by voting for one or another, you acknowledge that:

4_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 4 LSK per block;
3_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 3 LSK per block;
2_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 2 LSK per block;
1_lisk_per_block: you are supporting the option to reduce forging rewards to 1 LSK per block;
disable_reward: you are supporting the option to cancel forging rewards completely;
change_pos: you are supporting the option to change DPoS algorithm for any other POS option.

If any delegate will get into TOP-101 (which I highly doubt t.b.h.), all forging rewards will be divided among the poll participants who voted for him.

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Quote from: Calabi–Yau Manifold on March 01, 2017, 01:49:58 PM

Quote from: s0nix on March 01, 2017, 01:33:39 PM

Quote from: zanzibar on March 01, 2017, 01:24:28 PM

Wow, I didn't even realize devs were from Crypti, holy shit I'm glad I didn't invest in this shitcoin.

After 12 months? Logically, most of you trolls have no idea what they are doing here.
Investing in a project without knowing it. Holy shit, how stupid you can be?!

Now you're angry. But instead of beating yourself, you spread FUD here.

bullshit

He wrote he didn't invest...

crap

Yes, he did not.
But I have spoken for all trolls and especially for those who cry "I lost ..."

souljah1h

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Hyperspace snail

Quote from: Calabi–Yau Manifold on March 01, 2017, 01:57:41 PM

Lisk ex-advisor telling truth about Lisk crap?: https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.ca/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html Shocked

From that article

Quote

Second, I requested an immediate increase in staffing. To facilitate the advice, I recommended several recruitment options from outsourcing some development components to a trusted Ukrainian shop to directly recruiting using some talent scouts that I've worked with in the past.

The lack of a legal entity and lack of access to funds seems to have greatly slowed this process. I still cannot understand why they don't have more developers. For example, IOHK hired seven full time scala developers in three months time for ETC.

And this

Quote

Third, I requested that they get a security audit of the existing source and protocols. As it was inherited and written in a very dangerous language (javascript), I speculate that is a high probability there exists at least one ticking time bomb in the github repo. To the best of my understanding an audit hasn't been done. I could be wrong.

Makes me feel worried. Please address these concerns Lisk team.

Calabi–Yau Manifold

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Lisk ex-advisor telling truth about Lisk crap?: https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.ca/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html Shocked

Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 403. (Read 3074142 times)