[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 422.

Bitdonator

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1002

Quote from: s0nix on February 24, 2017, 05:08:30 PM

Quote from: Grumlin on February 24, 2017, 03:33:44 PM

Quote from: Grumlin on January 02, 2017, 04:53:59 AM

add lisk to faucet
liskfaucet.grumlin.com

add a little lisk else

AVAILABLE : 0.3 LISK, to fast for me Shocked

Interesting that there is no good Lisk faucet since
project launch. All have near zero balance and disapear
after some time

It would be good if some delegates donate some percent
of new forked Lisk (lets say 10%) to faucet. It will help
do diversify Lisk to many people and let them interested about project.

seektree

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 10

Quote from: O_Omaha on February 24, 2017, 04:11:09 PM

Quote from: MrPresident on February 24, 2017, 03:29:21 PM

The Lisk Team should be working 100% on getting that SDK rebuilt as thats the only thing that will pull this turd of a coin out of it's death spiral.

Quote

It has yet to be "changed" since the first lisk implementation, and the SDK is exactly what is being worked on

Sitting around for 2 months and throwing out ideas about how the SDK should function and what tools should be included is not what I'd call "being worked on".

This planning should have been done months ago and honestly the SDK should have been finished long ago.

i think we all agree. the only people sticking up for it are team members. what did they do for a year? its clear the team is just realizing how monumental of a task this is, which smells scammy. lets hope thats not the case and we all get some REWARD for holding lisk like waves holders Wink

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Quote from: Grumlin on February 24, 2017, 03:33:44 PM

Quote from: Grumlin on January 02, 2017, 04:53:59 AM

add lisk to faucet
liskfaucet.grumlin.com

add a little lisk else

AVAILABLE : 0.3 LISK, to fast for me Shocked

Poly#Crypto

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 510

Quote from: Bitdonator on February 24, 2017, 04:22:20 PM

Quote from: Poly#Crypto on February 24, 2017, 04:06:03 PM

Quote from: taurados on February 24, 2017, 03:51:28 PM

polo is down?
pending payout since 1 day

Not really down.
But since yesterday there are many reports about problems on Poloniex.

So open a new support ticket with your transaction ID, link to the explorer et cetera.
And then you must have patience, 24 - 48 hours for an answer.

They probably upgrading Lisk wallet to new 0.6.0 version,
just be patient...

But usually, if those had problems with some updates then they close deposits and withdrawals and announce a wallet maintenance.

Bitdonator

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Poly#Crypto on February 24, 2017, 04:06:03 PM

Quote from: taurados on February 24, 2017, 03:51:28 PM

polo is down?
pending payout since 1 day

Not really down.
But since yesterday there are many reports about problems on Poloniex.

So open a new support ticket with your transaction ID, link to the explorer et cetera.
And then you must have patience, 24 - 48 hours for an answer.

They probably upgrading Lisk wallet to new 0.6.0 version,
just be patient...

O_Omaha

full member

Activity: 159

Merit: 100

Quote from: MrPresident on February 24, 2017, 03:29:21 PM

The Lisk Team should be working 100% on getting that SDK rebuilt as thats the only thing that will pull this turd of a coin out of it's death spiral.

Quote

It has yet to be "changed" since the first lisk implementation, and the SDK is exactly what is being worked on

Sitting around for 2 months and throwing out ideas about how the SDK should function and what tools should be included is not what I'd call "being worked on".

This planning should have been done months ago and honestly the SDK should have been finished long ago.

MrPresident

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Think or swim.

Quote from: O_Omaha on February 24, 2017, 03:29:12 PM

Quote from: breeze71 on February 24, 2017, 03:21:55 PM

Quote

Why does the lisk team keep going back around to changing DPoS?

The current system works as it was designed to work.

The Lisk Team should be working 100% on getting that SDK rebuilt as thats the only thing that will pull this turd of a coin out of it's death spiral.

Yes man, you're right. Need to focus on SDK, this is the most important problem. All tired of waiting. After that solving problems with inflation and DPOS.

This project could have been a winner with the right management. They knew the SDK was crap months ago, but did nothing.

This project IS a winner, and the SDK is right on schedule, after core... as planned.

Poly#Crypto

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 510

Quote from: taurados on February 24, 2017, 03:51:28 PM

polo is down?
pending payout since 1 day

Not really down.
But since yesterday there are many reports about problems on Poloniex.

So open a new support ticket with your transaction ID, link to the explorer et cetera.
And then you must have patience, 24 - 48 hours for an answer.

taurados

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 508

polo is down?
pending payout since 1 day

Grumlin

legendary

Activity: 2893

Merit: 1158

Quote from: Grumlin on January 02, 2017, 04:53:59 AM

add lisk to faucet
liskfaucet.grumlin.com

add a little lisk else

MrPresident

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Think or swim.

Quote from: souljah1h on February 24, 2017, 08:54:06 AM

Quote from: MrPresident on February 24, 2017, 08:41:38 AM

PoW vs DPoS:
Contrary to popular belief, 101 single-purpose servers are far more decentralized than thousands of miners lumped on a few mining pools;
not to mention the fact that with PoW, you have an ongoing arms race to become the most powerful miner,
leading to an ever increasing energy consumption of the whole network bottlenecked through these pools.
The Lisk Network has no such difficulty adjustments, and is extremely eco-friendly.
Every pool is just 1 server in the network, not a bottleneck.

But what about the sidechains when Lisk projects are released? How to secure them?

Side Chains may choose whatever algo model they like, including mirroring the Lisk core. Wink

Quote from: Wexfgy12 on February 24, 2017, 12:58:01 PM

does the lisk website use cloud flare, are addresses that we used to login potentially compromised?

no

Quote from: O_Omaha on February 24, 2017, 03:12:39 PM

Why does the lisk team keep going back around to changing DPoS?

The current system works as it was designed to work.

The Lisk Team should be working 100% on getting that SDK rebuilt as thats the only thing that will pull this turd of a coin out of it's death spiral.

It has yet to be "changed" since the first lisk implementation, and the SDK is exactly what is being worked on

O_Omaha

full member

Activity: 159

Merit: 100

Quote from: breeze71 on February 24, 2017, 03:21:55 PM

Quote

Why does the lisk team keep going back around to changing DPoS?

The current system works as it was designed to work.

The Lisk Team should be working 100% on getting that SDK rebuilt as thats the only thing that will pull this turd of a coin out of it's death spiral.

Yes man, you're right. Need to focus on SDK, this is the most important problem. All tired of waiting. After that solving problems with inflation and DPOS.

This project could have been a winner with the right management. They knew the SDK was crap months ago, but did nothing.

Wexfgy12

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Quote from: Wexfgy12 on February 24, 2017, 12:58:01 PM

does the lisk website use cloud flare, are addresses that we used to login potentially compromised?

anybody?

s0nix

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 511

Inflation is not a real problem. The inflation at ETH is much higher I think. Also not the rewards, because those are reduced by 1 LSK each year.
Pools are a matter for voters. If people want pools, then they vote for it. If not then not.

The real main eye should be the development (Core, SDK).

breeze71

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote

Why does the lisk team keep going back around to changing DPoS?

The current system works as it was designed to work.

The Lisk Team should be working 100% on getting that SDK rebuilt as thats the only thing that will pull this turd of a coin out of it's death spiral.

Yes man, you're right. Need to focus on SDK, this is the most important problem. All tired of waiting. After that solving problems with inflation and DPOS.

bitbitch

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: O_Omaha on February 24, 2017, 03:12:39 PM

Quote from: bitbitch on February 24, 2017, 02:54:08 PM

Quote from: breeze71 on February 24, 2017, 09:17:25 AM

Quote

PoW vs DPoS:
Contrary to popular belief, 101 single-purpose servers are far more decentralized than thousands of miners lumped on a few mining pools;
not to mention the fact that with PoW, you have an ongoing arms race to become the most powerful miner,
leading to an ever increasing energy consumption of the whole network bottlenecked through these pools.
The Lisk Network has no such difficulty adjustments, and is extremely eco-friendly.
Every pool is just 1 server in the network, not a bottleneck.

In POW paying for electricity, in DPOS paying for infinite inflation and a large amount of new forged tokens(3,15M new forged lsk in per year with almost free cost price). How you can save money in DPOS? I don't see any advantages in DPOS with such inflation.

Quote

But what about the sidechains when Lisk projects are released?

https://cointelegraph.com/news/lisk-unveils-core-software-revamp-security-top-priority
The move is, in fact, a precursor to a complete rewrite of Lisk’s SDK code base, which according to the press release is still at the conceptual stage.

pooling, forging rewards, and inflation are being discussed this evening on Lisk chat. there will be changes.

Why does the lisk team keep going back around to changing DPoS?

The current system works as it was designed to work.

The Lisk Team should be working 100% on getting that SDK rebuilt as thats the only thing that will pull this turd of a coin out of it's death spiral.

head over to Lisk chat. the idea of reform is gaining traction.

O_Omaha

full member

Activity: 159

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitbitch on February 24, 2017, 02:54:08 PM

Quote from: breeze71 on February 24, 2017, 09:17:25 AM

Quote

PoW vs DPoS:
Contrary to popular belief, 101 single-purpose servers are far more decentralized than thousands of miners lumped on a few mining pools;
not to mention the fact that with PoW, you have an ongoing arms race to become the most powerful miner,
leading to an ever increasing energy consumption of the whole network bottlenecked through these pools.
The Lisk Network has no such difficulty adjustments, and is extremely eco-friendly.
Every pool is just 1 server in the network, not a bottleneck.

In POW paying for electricity, in DPOS paying for infinite inflation and a large amount of new forged tokens(3,15M new forged lsk in per year with almost free cost price). How you can save money in DPOS? I don't see any advantages in DPOS with such inflation.

Quote

But what about the sidechains when Lisk projects are released?

https://cointelegraph.com/news/lisk-unveils-core-software-revamp-security-top-priority
The move is, in fact, a precursor to a complete rewrite of Lisk’s SDK code base, which according to the press release is still at the conceptual stage.

pooling, forging rewards, and inflation are being discussed this evening on Lisk chat. there will be changes.

Why does the lisk team keep going back around to changing DPoS?

The current system works as it was designed to work.

The Lisk Team should be working 100% on getting that SDK rebuilt as thats the only thing that will pull this turd of a coin out of it's death spiral.

bitbitch

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: breeze71 on February 24, 2017, 09:17:25 AM

Quote

PoW vs DPoS:
Contrary to popular belief, 101 single-purpose servers are far more decentralized than thousands of miners lumped on a few mining pools;
not to mention the fact that with PoW, you have an ongoing arms race to become the most powerful miner,
leading to an ever increasing energy consumption of the whole network bottlenecked through these pools.
The Lisk Network has no such difficulty adjustments, and is extremely eco-friendly.
Every pool is just 1 server in the network, not a bottleneck.

In POW paying for electricity, in DPOS paying for infinite inflation and a large amount of new forged tokens(3,15M new forged lsk in per year with almost free cost price). How you can save money in DPOS? I don't see any advantages in DPOS with such inflation.

Quote

But what about the sidechains when Lisk projects are released?

https://cointelegraph.com/news/lisk-unveils-core-software-revamp-security-top-priority
The move is, in fact, a precursor to a complete rewrite of Lisk’s SDK code base, which according to the press release is still at the conceptual stage.

pooling, forging rewards, and inflation are being discussed this evening on Lisk chat. there will be changes.

jayohby

full member

Activity: 192

Merit: 100

one redeeming quality about this project is that it's not a scam.

max may be junior and inexperienced, but he's not a scammer and is credible.

but really, needs to step up the game and develop strong team for me to invest.

O_Omaha

full member

Activity: 159

Merit: 100

Quote from: gnargnar on February 24, 2017, 12:13:25 PM

I just took the time to revised my votes and un-voted many current delegates that, I believe, are "non do'ers" for Lisk.
Either they don't have a proper Delegate proposal thread on the Lisk forum, or are just -maintaining a node-, or are there -just because they were there at the beginining-.

I'm inviting everyone to also do that work and review their current votes.

I still believe that a split of around 40% pools and 60% Lisk do-ers is an healthy ratio of votes to have.
We already have a pools list posted every each days, but lack totally of a list of actual peeps dev'ing and building on Lisk.

I'm currently reviewing the delegates proposals to give some votes. if you can reply here or pm me for some recommendations, i'll appreciate.
thanks.

So you are wasting space here to tell the community that you revised your votes and we should do the same as you?

Nobody cares who YOU vote for or unvote.

The last time I checked, I could vote whomever I wanted and I dont need a LiskShillBoy telling me how I should vote.

I bought these coins and I will vote for whomever I please.

So stop wasting my time.

Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 422. (Read 3074324 times)