[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 522.

DimiZb

sr. member

Activity: 403

Merit: 250

Quote from: MoveCrypto on January 10, 2017, 10:55:43 PM

Quote from: DimiZb on January 10, 2017, 09:52:48 PM

Quote from: Thereisnospoon on January 10, 2017, 07:55:45 PM

Fudometer reding tells the bottom is near.

Currect price is holding strong, should be the botton, unless that whale dumps his 4 million coins.

Those coins were sold and/or withdrawn from poloniex months ago. Polo LSK holdings hit a maximum of 38M when he first deposited that 4M on 3 August 2016

https://lisktools.io/accountInformation.php?address=6458009167317801978L

9.5M LSK has been withdrawn since then, so polo holdings are currently at 28.5M

Months ago? It looks like not, a week ago i saw 4 million lisk wall at 30k at again, that whale did not sell, still holding.

Burmik123

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 257

And we go again.

Quote from: Virtum on January 10, 2017, 05:26:49 AM

Quote from: 2017 coin on January 10, 2017, 04:32:06 AM

Quote from: oldisoft on January 31, 2016, 12:50:53 AM

Hello! Trying to understand- what is this?

this is a digital coin

This is a digital scam

cmon, man, this is a good coin for speculation! also i think it will bring a great profit soon. falling ends now, so now we see a start of something great.

Ankara

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Virtum on January 11, 2017, 01:05:05 AM

Quote from: Thereisnospoon on January 10, 2017, 07:55:45 PM

Fudometer reding tells the bottom is near.

To the bottom very far, this shitcoin will fall, until it dies.

And cananbana should quit sexually harassing sheep, but neither will happen so lets move on and see if theres ever any change.

Virtum

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 102

Quote from: Thereisnospoon on January 10, 2017, 07:55:45 PM

Fudometer reding tells the bottom is near.

To the bottom very far, this shitcoin will fall, until it dies.

MoveCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

move that crypto

Quote from: DimiZb on January 10, 2017, 09:52:48 PM

Quote from: Thereisnospoon on January 10, 2017, 07:55:45 PM

Fudometer reding tells the bottom is near.

Currect price is holding strong, should be the botton, unless that whale dumps his 4 million coins.

Those coins were sold and/or withdrawn from poloniex months ago. Polo LSK holdings hit a maximum of 38M when he first deposited that 4M on 3 August 2016

https://lisktools.io/accountInformation.php?address=6458009167317801978L

9.5M LSK has been withdrawn since then, so polo holdings are currently at 28.5M

DimiZb

sr. member

Activity: 403

Merit: 250

Quote from: Thereisnospoon on January 10, 2017, 07:55:45 PM

Fudometer reding tells the bottom is near.

Currect price is holding strong, should be the botton, unless that whale dumps his 4 million coins.

ImI

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1019

Quote from: Thereisnospoon on January 10, 2017, 07:55:45 PM

Fudometer reding tells the bottom is near.

Bottom is near because Altcoins are in for a general relief rally and Lisk will run with the pack. Longterm could be another story though.

Thereisnospoon

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

BIG AIRDROP: t.me/otppaychat

Fudometer reding tells the bottom is near.

xiaokele

member

Activity: 80

Merit: 10

Quote from: Reavon on January 10, 2017, 06:02:09 AM

Quote from: Virtum on January 10, 2017, 05:32:09 AM

https://lisknation.com/lisk-the-decentralization-debate-aca78ec5f819#.hbe1n2a9r

Problem #1: The Lisk team holds too much voting weight and therefore Lisk is not decentralized.
Problem #2: The Lisk team intends to utilize their voting weight to pay employees and hand-pick the active delegation.
Problem #3: Does the Lisk team really trust the DPoS model?

Lisk is a big big problem for those who invest in it.

Wrong. You are simply wrong and you should feel sorry for that.

#1: Lisk amount held by Lisk Team is not 51% thus they are not the driving force in the network.
We investors are. And should something malliciouse happen we can and will revote delegates that fix the problem.

#2: source?!

#3: this is a question your simple mind asks and not a description of a problem!

So please can you explain to me why you are here? A reasonable debate obviously it is not that you seek.

He just copied the subheadlines from the last section of the referenced article and didn't even realise that without providing more context #3 is no problem per se. Oh man ...

zanzibar

hero member

Activity: 715

Merit: 500

Quote from: BitBanksy on January 10, 2017, 03:42:24 PM

Quote from: MrPresident on January 10, 2017, 03:19:59 PM

Pretty weak Fudding if you ask me... empty points that have been covered a dozen times in here.

These weak fudders are newbies ornés members... most certainly sockpuppet

Lisk definitely comes off as a scammy pump and dump, no one is going to use it, Ethereum dominates anything SC related and always will. I can't believe so many people threw btc at this project, lol. I'm telling you, every single Alt decreases in btc/alt ratio with time, look at any chart, with occasional pumps here and there, holding Lisk long term will not pan out well.

BitBanksy

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: MrPresident on January 10, 2017, 03:19:59 PM

Pretty weak Fudding if you ask me... empty points that have been covered a dozen times in here.

These weak fudders are newbies or new members... most certainly sockpuppet

MrPresident

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Think or swim.

The troll FUD in here is getting thick... by people that have no business commenting because they know nothing of Lisk.

If someone was thinking dapps arrive before mainchain stabilization, then they simply don't understand crypto, and didn't bother reading the roadmap. That would seem a necessary 1st step before commenting on something you obviously do not understand or even read up on.
Pretty weak Fudding if you ask me... empty points that have been covered a dozen times in here.

Reavon

sr. member

Activity: 374

Merit: 250

Quote from: Virtum on January 10, 2017, 05:32:09 AM

https://lisknation.com/lisk-the-decentralization-debate-aca78ec5f819#.hbe1n2a9r

Problem #1: The Lisk team holds too much voting weight and therefore Lisk is not decentralized.
Problem #2: The Lisk team intends to utilize their voting weight to pay employees and hand-pick the active delegation.
Problem #3: Does the Lisk team really trust the DPoS model?

Lisk is a big big problem for those who invest in it.

Wrong. You are simply wrong and you should feel sorry for that.

#1: Lisk amount held by Lisk Team is not 51% thus they are not the driving force in the network.
We investors are. And should something malliciouse happen we can and will revote delegates that fix the problem.

#2: source?!

#3: this is a question your simple mind asks and not a description of a problem!

So please can you explain to me why you are here? A reasonable debate obviously it is not that you seek.

Virtum

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 102

https://lisknation.com/lisk-the-decentralization-debate-aca78ec5f819#.hbe1n2a9r

Problem #1: The Lisk team holds too much voting weight and therefore Lisk is not decentralized.
Problem #2: The Lisk team intends to utilize their voting weight to pay employees and hand-pick the active delegation.
Problem #3: Does the Lisk team really trust the DPoS model?

Lisk is a big big problem for those who invest in it.

Virtum

full member

Activity: 223

Merit: 102

Quote from: 2017 coin on January 10, 2017, 04:32:06 AM

Quote from: oldisoft on January 31, 2016, 12:50:53 AM

Hello! Trying to understand- what is this?

this is a digital coin

This is a digital scam

2017 coin

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

Quote from: oldisoft on January 31, 2016, 12:50:53 AM

Hello! Trying to understand- what is this?

this is a digital coin

titibach

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Lisk inflation this, etherum inflation that.
Come on people lets move on lol

Vega

hero member

Activity: 739

Merit: 500

Quote from: breeze71 on January 10, 2017, 01:16:53 AM

People are talking about the long term when they just don't want to work very well now.

People started talking about long term after you talked about long term again and again. Not just long term but in terms of decaded and centuries even millenia.
At least when we talk about long term we speak of realistic timeframes, months, or quarters.

Vega

hero member

Activity: 739

Merit: 500

Quote from: x54hs27ag2 on January 10, 2017, 03:48:20 AM

My gullible friend believed these harlequins and bought Lisk at 85k, he lost last 23btc Cheesy

he waited first dapps in Q2 2016. Wink

Be careful.

That's trading for you. When someone is selling someone is buying.
It's not that he was deceived it was that he wasn't well informed. I, and anyone who is an active members of the community, and by active I don't mean actively whining about everything under the sun, but those who actually do stuff or at least follow what is happening other than the price movement could have told your friend as early as the original date of the mainnet launch that dapps won't be happening in Q2 2016.

x54hs27ag2

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

DimiZb gembitz hollandvan breeze71 5thangel guys, don't waste your time on it. They had plenty of time and money to write code and expansion. crypti (750btc) 2014, 2015 >>> Lisk(14000 btc) 2016, 2017.
I think they are fraudsters. Normal for ICO. Wink

My gullible friend believed these harlequins and bought Lisk at 85k, he lost last 23btc Cheesy

he waited first dapps in Q2 2016. Wink

Be careful.

Quote

https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fm3WqkVB.jpg&t=572&c=zW_j1TobRaQLJQ

Quote

Lisk averaged 6 git commits per day over the last ten months.

12 000 btc for this? Cheesy

People do much more without huge financial resources.

Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 522. (Read 3074310 times)