If there arent enough delegates who will share with the community I will start one with other dutch user here (elitecstrike).
There should be at least 51% of the 101 delegates that use sharing with the community. This way Lisk would not be sold and be holding in the wallet and the community will get something in return.
The rest of the income should be used for promotion of lisk, dapps and personal income.
Most delegates will use the rewards only for themselfs.
Not true - if you read through most of the delegate proposals ~80% will fund BAPPs (Blockchain Apps) which should be essential at this stage and long-term success of LISK only sharing back majority to voters who will only dump it on the market won't do LISK any good on the long term.
I agree a lot should go towards BAPPs. The faster LSK produces LSK accessible apps along with LSKHQ, the faster the market will realise, 'hey javascript is really popular and easy to develop with and they are outpacing Ethereum in terms of progress' which equals moon.
However a centralization issue LSK has is that +-30% is on Poloniex.
Giving shareholders a direct incentive to remove their LSK and participate in the voting process is positive imo. So I don't mind up to 40% going back to shareholders. Unlike miners who have electricity and equipment costs, so mine and dump. LSK shareholders are invested in the future of LSK, so are not dumpers and by Hodling they get to earn more LSK via this process in the future. In so doing they are actively decentralizing the DAC and providing a valuable and necessary service.
You could argue shareholders should do this anyway but it takes a reasonable amount of work to get involved in this process. As you can see from BTS, which largely lacks these type of incentives,
http://cryptofresh.com/witnesses , the top delegate has 22% support and the lowest active delegate has less than 10%. It would be nice to achieve much higher voter participation numbers so that centralized exchanges are less of a risk.
