We check that, thank you for your info.
Kind Regards Christian
Topic: [ANN][Main] Bitcore- BTX - Datacarriersize up to 220 bytes - page 1004. (Read 730297 times)
Hi I get error,when put my btc address in link. Error : Sorry, No Balance on Snapshot - Block 463604 ! Please try again...
When I check my address on blockchain,there are 2,4 btc's
Should I wail more time?
When I check my address on blockchain,there are 2,4 btc's
Should I wail more time?
I ran into another problem: I have an address to link, and signed a message with Electrum. I can verify it with Coinig.com. Signed message: "BTX" (without quotes).
And yet, I get this error at bitcore.cc:
Could it be BitCore only accepts compressed addresses? Those worked fine for me, while the uncompressed addresses give this error.
And yet, I get this error at bitcore.cc:
Code:
Error : Sign Message not match with Address. Maybe Text is not "BTX", Capslock is very important here !
Could it be BitCore only accepts compressed addresses? Those worked fine for me, while the uncompressed addresses give this error.
the same error with mine message/ It seems that BTX Claiming Service is faulty while coinig.com verifies easily my message
I ran into another problem: I have an address to link, and signed a message with Electrum. I can verify it with Coinig.com. Signed message: "BTX" (without quotes).
And yet, I get this error at bitcore.cc:
Could it be BitCore only accepts compressed addresses? Those worked fine for me, while the uncompressed addresses give this error.
And yet, I get this error at bitcore.cc:
Code:
Error : Sign Message not match with Address. Maybe Text is not "BTX", Capslock is very important here !
Could it be BitCore only accepts compressed addresses? Those worked fine for me, while the uncompressed addresses give this error.
I am getting the same error. I am signing verified signatures and getting this error? What is a compressed address?
I ran into another problem: I have an address to link, and signed a message with Electrum. I can verify it with Coinig.com. Signed message: "BTX" (without quotes).
And yet, I get this error at bitcore.cc:
Could it be BitCore only accepts compressed addresses? Those worked fine for me, while the uncompressed addresses give this error.
Update: it's fixed now
And yet, I get this error at bitcore.cc:
Code:
Error : Sign Message not match with Address. Maybe Text is not "BTX", Capslock is very important here !
Could it be BitCore only accepts compressed addresses? Those worked fine for me, while the uncompressed addresses give this error.
Update: it's fixed now
How many BTX would you get claiming with a 20 BTC bitcoin wallet?
20
How many BTX would you get claiming with a 20 BTC bitcoin wallet?
Can we get free btx just by block 463604?Any more block?
After some fiddling, I finally got the BitCore-wallet to work in Ubuntu 16 LTS. It just didn't work in my Lubuntu.
I can now confirm Bitcore-private-keys are just completely the same format as Bitcoin keys.
I can now confirm Bitcore-private-keys are just completely the same format as Bitcoin keys.
Can u please post your GPUs hash rates, because I want to buy second video card and i want to pay around $200 for it.
Currently I'm using for BTX MSI GTX 1050Ti 4gb at 6200 kh/s
thanks
Currently I'm using for BTX MSI GTX 1050Ti 4gb at 6200 kh/s
thanks
accumulate for 6 months, and then get a shitload BTX, THAT is my plan.
Is there any problem with suprnova pool? It seems it doesn't update and I have connection problems with web page 
The server borked yesterday somehow... It's fixed now !
Probably a silly question but I can't conect btx.suprnova.cc with chrome browser (miner connects fine), the only way to connect is using the TOR network... I don't have any problem with other suprnova pools... only with btx pool... any ideas?
Should be fixed now, had a superhysteric firewall setting there which probably blocked some legit requests as well
Ok... all is working fine now... thanks
Is there any problem with suprnova pool? It seems it doesn't update and I have connection problems with web page
The server borked yesterday somehow... It's fixed now !
Probably a silly question but I can't conect btx.suprnova.cc with chrome browser (miner connects fine), the only way to connect is using the TOR network... I don't have any problem with other suprnova pools... only with btx pool... any ideas?
Should be fixed now, had a superhysteric firewall setting there which probably blocked some legit requests as well
Is there any problem with suprnova pool? It seems it doesn't update and I have connection problems with web page
The server borked yesterday somehow... It's fixed now !
Probably a silly question but I can't conect btx.suprnova.cc with chrome browser (miner connects fine), the only way to connect is using the TOR network... I don't have any problem with other suprnova pools... only with btx pool... any ideas?
Just follow this and you're good:
https://michael.mckinnon.id.au/2016/05/13/building-a-namecoin-server-with-ubuntu-16-04/
worked for me on ubuntu server 16.04 lts. The only thing you really need to compile as a dependency is berkeleydb, other stuff can be simply installed via apt-get, and the autoconf and configure will succeed, and you can build. Post your configure output where it failed if any trouble.
https://michael.mckinnon.id.au/2016/05/13/building-a-namecoin-server-with-ubuntu-16-04/
worked for me on ubuntu server 16.04 lts. The only thing you really need to compile as a dependency is berkeleydb, other stuff can be simply installed via apt-get, and the autoconf and configure will succeed, and you can build. Post your configure output where it failed if any trouble.
Well, you would need to build libprotobuf 9 then. Other possibilities: Try ubuntu 16.04 LTS, or, and that would be a simpler thing maybe: build the wallet yourself with your own dependencies. So you can use boost1.61 etc.
Building myself was the other thing that failed. I'll try some different Ubuntu-versions first, and will report back here if it works or not. 
well...as you can see, you don't have the needed lib. You need 1.58, but you have 1.61.
Indeed, I didn't check the version number. Thanks!Quote
1. depending on your system (ubuntu etc.) check if the repositories have the 1.58 still available (maybe remove your current version first, if you don't need them anymore):
This is no longer available.Code:
sudo apt-get install libboost1.58-all-dev
Quote
2. Build 1.58 yourself:
This works, but "skips 6 targets". I get this:Code:
wget http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.58.0/boost_1_58_0.tar.gz
tar xvf boost_1_58_0.tar.gz
cd boost_1_58_0
./bootstrap.sh
./b2 install
tar xvf boost_1_58_0.tar.gz
cd boost_1_58_0
./bootstrap.sh
./b2 install
Code:
gcc.archive bin.v2/libs/test/build/gcc-6.2.0/release/link-static/threading-multi/libboost_test_exec_monitor.a
common.copy /usr/local/lib/libboost_test_exec_monitor.a
...failed updating 2 targets...
...skipped 6 targets...
...updated 12639 targets..
common.copy /usr/local/lib/libboost_test_exec_monitor.a
...failed updating 2 targets...
...skipped 6 targets...
...updated 12639 targets..
Trying to run the wallet gives the same error:
Code:
./bitcore-qt
./bitcore-qt: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_system.so.1.58.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Back to ldconfig and try again:./bitcore-qt: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_system.so.1.58.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Code:
./bitcore-qt
./bitcore-qt: error while loading shared libraries: libprotobuf.so.9: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Here too, I have a newer version: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.so.10.0.0./bitcore-qt: error while loading shared libraries: libprotobuf.so.9: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Quote
I don't think that there is a big difference which exact linux you use. I have ubuntu, mint and debian, and they are more or less the same. Ubuntu seems to have the best repositories.
Is there an Ubuntu-version that has it work out of the box, with older libraries?Well, you would need to build libprotobuf 9 then. Other possibilities: Try ubuntu 16.04 LTS, or, and that would be a simpler thing maybe: build the wallet yourself with your own dependencies. So you can use boost1.61 etc.
You guys do know that the symbol BTX is already in use, right?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annbtx-bitcoin-the-next-generation-new-ann-and-website-1051266
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annbtx-bitcoin-the-next-generation-new-ann-and-website-1051266
Hello, yes we know that. It is not perfect. Kind Regards Christian
You guys do know that the symbol BTX is already in use, right?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annbtx-bitcoin-the-next-generation-new-ann-and-website-1051266
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annbtx-bitcoin-the-next-generation-new-ann-and-website-1051266
LoyceV: just compile it from source.. works a treat (with qt5 gui).
Jump to: