Topic: [ANN][Main] Bitcore- BTX - Datacarriersize up to 220 bytes - page 16. (Read 729872 times)

Oh, I see that you were offended (it was not my intention) I can communicate with the people of Crex24 to see what is that limitation that you mention (without needing to assault anyone), but to question that the team requested some type of limitation in an exchange, seems to me something irresponsible (especially without having proof), we fully appreciate your support.

Posting beautiful pictures coupled with misleading information doesn't add credibility to your team. Where is LIMXDev? I am a longtime follower of his projects and I have used to much more sensible comments from him. At least he was honest and professional. Please ask your team to provide a better communication channel.

As for your rhetoric questions:

There can't be any trade less than 1000sat on CREX24, just because that exchange doesn't allow orders lower than 1000sat. However the whole buy book was empty on CREX24 right at the moment when I posted my comment above. I don't have screenshot, sorry, I think I have enough credibility for not being forced to prove my words by screenshots for every little point.

If you don't see that limitation, well, all I can suggest - try to look once again. Or ask yourself 'why there is no order for less than 1000 sat in the orderbook'? Or alternatively, try to put a buy order for less than 1000 satoshi. That little effort will bring you to a nice red error message telling "Must be not less than 0.00001", which will definitely help you see the limitation I am speaking about.
As per your 'things can be communicated better" - here it looks we are completely agree. Someone definitely has to improve communication and attitude. Well, probably that refers to both of us...

I don't know who put that limitation, but as no other coin has such limitation, I assume it was requested by the team. Not sure though.

In any case, instead of just striking back with your comments, you would better ask some competent member of the team to make some actions to fix issues mentioned in my comment (hint - contact the exchange to remove the limitation).

P.S. Sorry if my comments sound a bit harsh. I want to stress once again, that I am a supporter of this project, that's the reason I would like a better communication as well as less defensive and more constructive approach from the part of the team which we have to deal with now, when Christian is absent by some reason.

Only cause you haven’t bought back in yet. 

---

The price is lower than 1000 sat, however CREX24 doesn't allow to place orders for less than that amount (crazy restriction btw - I've never seen such restriction on any other coin, which suggests BitCore devs had some unofficial ties to CREX24 in past).

Is there any dev team still left? Are they going to contact CREX24 to remove that senseless limitation?

"0.0.0.0" is an alias to "all interfaces of the local machine". So failure to bind to "0.0.0.0:8555" means the program cannot open the port on your local machine (so the problem is on the local machine, not on an external gateway).

There generally could be two reasons: 1) That port is already opened by some other program; 2) you have a general problem with access to ports (or to any network resources) on that machine. The first assumption could be resolved by running TCPView and checking whether you have any program bound to the ports in question; the second assumption could be checked by the same TCPView - to see if you have ANY program successfully bound to ANY port on that machine. In any case you would need to use TCPView.

Not sure what could have been broken by using bcdedit, but you might have screwed the networking engine on that machine somehow. TCPView might show whether you have any program successfully using the networking stack, especially whether there is any kind of server program running.

Not sure why BitCore could be using HTTP server... But anyway, disabling "listen" is more of a workaround than a solution, as there is something wrong with that PC, which could manifest in different way, so it should be fixed instead.

Did you try to check who is using the port 8555? TCPView (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/tcpview) should show it. You may have some kind of malware, which is using multiple ports on your PC. Or just the opposite - a new antivirus, which is blocking all the ports.

Your wallet shows bind error 10013.

The first easiest thing I would try is to reboot the machine to release ports - if you didn't do that already, of course. If you did, then see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3314656/what-causes-tcplistener-socket-error-10013

in particular it tells (though there is more info there):

My qt-wallet runs without problems. Are you using the current version 0.90.9.7? If not, update your wallet to the latest version and check if the wallet is running again. 

https://github.com/LIMXTEC/BitCore/releases/tag/0.90.9.7

Gulp, now you’re scaring me. I swapped the most. Ivo is working at it but with the Covid mess things got delayed.  Hopefully by Christmas we’ll see something. 

What about the bitcoreglobal token that was mentioned a while back?I swapped a good few BTX for their token and now they seem to have disappeared into the night.I am beginning to have trust issues with that project 

lol all the ones i see it on are very low volume or ones I have never heard of - in case you have not noticed, a lot of exchanges keep folding and running off with people's  funds.

can you list me a well trusted exchange that has decent to high volume of BTX?

Maybe you have trust issues?  I’d look into that ASAP. 

still hoping to see bitcore rise back up to something - I cannot find it on any exchange I trust.

---

---

Yeah

As far as I understand they do not have a product now. Apparently they plan to start crowdfunding, but didn't do that yet. So basically, they have no hardware, but they have big plans, nice pictures, and a desire to get money right now

Well, that's ok, but would be nice if they communicate clearly, instead of all those flashy "campaigns" and "huge discounts".

Instead of that they have this:

Everyone wants to become "VIP", right?  

P.S. Well, it seems I just cannot get used to marketing bullshit... They all threat people as idiots... its bit insulting. But well, for most people that's probably ok, so..

except when you go to the site, you cannot buy it. it only has a spot to enter email address to sign up for more spam.

---