Topic: [ANN][Main] Bitcore- BTX - Datacarriersize up to 220 bytes - page 874. (Read 730297 times)

Need algo bitcore, not timetravel

https://imgur.com/a/142ck

Post your miner line, probably wrong algo or something like that.

I dont think they understood it fully but I think I know what they are getting at. What it boils down to is this end "big drop" and I think they thought it was going to be more than

the 25% posted. I can understand the sentiment as I too thought the last drop would be bigger. I personally dont care which % we get as long as that play or distribution method

will net us the most ROI and $$$ long term. Lets not get short-sighted here. We are all here because BTX is a great project and we all want whats best for it. Lets work together now!

Hi there!

I'm trying to mine Bitcore with my 1080 TI rig, using ccminer 2.2, but all the shares are invalid, what's wrong?

Well the initial plan as stated on page one was that the unclaimed coins would be given out in steps to BTX holders after November 2nd. The plan was changed on us and now the devs wanted to airdrop roughly 6.6 million coins to all people who hold more than .001 BTC at the time of a second snapshot. This means that early adopters are not valued nearly as highly as BTC holders that haven't even claimed the coins for free when they had the chance over the course of the last 5 months. Its not a betrayal per se but it definitely isn't the best move in my mind. The current distribution plan would also still have the devs controlling 50% of the currency which still doesn't look great to exchanges and new users. My plan also has controls that are built in that will greatly reduce the threat of a dump after October 30th. It literally gives the devs time to get us on larger exchanges and develop a mobile wallet which would be tremendous news for the prospects of the coin as a whole. Ideally this would happen before the 3% airdrops end in February in my plan. I am really only thinking with my head and not really at all with emotion.

I'm note sure you really understood the announcement.

Please, can you give me an example calculation how this would give you the feeling of being betrayed?

Ok well on the poll I had a request to create what the devs numbers would look like so that everyone can compare. The first link is the dev's current distribution plan with the assumption that every single person registers to receive the 3% airdrop. The coins, under the devs plan, will not be full distributed until roughly October of 2018 by my tentative projections. Obviously BTC holders claiming their BTX in large numbers could drastically change and shorten both my projection and the devs projection due to the 3% weekly airdrops. The second link is my proposal for distribution. The main thing to look at is the Oct 30th date which is really where we differ the most in our proposals. My proposal has coins still being distributed to a large number of people but the current BTX holders will be given a distribution closer to what was promised. It is a hybrid plan that I believe gives everyone an incentive to stay and be apart of the project. If you have any questions then please ask.

Dev's Proposal- https://imgur.com/a/7TWPg

My Proposal- https://imgur.com/a/GJq27

Nice poll, maybe it's a good time now to see some more date instead of just a lot of posts with each others opnion. Hopefully the response will be statistically significicant!

Hey guys I created a poll that i would like for you to participate in so that we can gauge the interest in the 3 major proposals that have been talked about in the past few days. It includes the dev's distribution model, the one that I have proposed here, and also continuing the weekly airdrops out much longer. I did not post the pros and cons but if you read from this thread I think enough of that has been talked about. This is a good opportunity to gauge what the community thinks as a whole and please make sure to answer honestly. The link to the poll is posted below.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2199926.new#new

Thanks, yeah i found out it is worthless.

Here is an idea:

Start with large airdrops and have them steadily decrease over time.  If you time one large airdrop at then end there will be a large dump.  Steadily decreasing airdrops cause the dumps to be spread out so that it won't shock the market.  Once all coins are distributed we do not want volatility because it will be the bad type.

i am disappointed btx holders  ll get less % than btc holders, i boght and holding but i fell like i am betrayed

I know that it is possible but it is not going to change your mining prospects much... Mining with GPU's is really the only viable way now.

Do I literally have to debunk everything you guys say? I get the importance of a wide distribution which is why I still kept the drop to BTC users. 6.6 million coins are literally still slotted for that purpose. I will choose the 4th largest address for BTX in this exercise. He has 26,823.54 BTX as of this very moment. By the time of the distribution he would have 31,095.83 if he just stays put and receives the weekly 3% distributions. The airdrop he would get under my plan would be 99,639.26. This would mean his grand total after the distribution would be 130,735.10. This would be 2.51% of coins in circulation if you exclude the airdrop coins to BTC holders and 1.1% if you include the coins dropped to BTC holders. (depends on your definition of in circulation) This is one of the largest addresses that holds BTX and even they would have only a small percentage of the coins. This is almost no different than any of the top holders for major coins out there. The distribution would be just as wide under my plan as under yours but the difference is it would please everyone. As I have stated before it would give a large distribution to early adopters which was largely promised to us, it would still do the drop to BTC addresses as you the devs would like, and it would continue the 3% weekly air drops which is great for marketing purposes. In addition to that, my plan has more coins getting spread out in a quick manner which increases your chances of getting on a bigger exchange like Bittrex... Those BTC holders are not likely to claim their coins so quickly and the ones that receive the large distribution will still stick around for the 3% weekly air drops. This gives you guys valuable time to get on exchanges and develop the coin before people would potentially want to cash in. It might not be absolutely perfect but it is a hell of a lot better than the current plan in place. What part of that means the distribution would not be spread out to a lot of individuals? I think you guys are great on the technology side of things but I am definitely starting to question your business sense. I'm just doing my due diligence and offering up a better solution. If you don't want to listen then that is up to you but just deal with the potential consequences.

*Edit* This person would also obviously hold less than 1% of the total coins which would include the coins the devs would still control after the drop. This is not so much and this is one of the largest holders of BTX.

same question here too

thats strange..got a i5 and bitcore.cc told ya to use suprnova... which mining pool can i use ? or has someone a good .bat for CPU notAMD mining ?

The importance of a broad distribution!





source: https://steemit.com/money/@teamsteem/cryptocurrency-2017-price-predictions-and-fundamentals

Greetz
Steve

how can I undermine that currency. ??

Another thing of note would be to add a feature on the website that allows the community to vote on issues relating to the coin. It would provide you with the insight of developing the coin in a way that the vast majority of the users want and it would provide all of us in the community with a voice to give our opinions on matters. All of these suggestion along with this distribution proposal only strengthen the prospects of this coin. I'm here to help make this work because I believe in the technology we have here. I support this coin in mining, buying coins, through social media, and even word of mouth. I really think what I have proposed is logical and fair to all parties involved. At any rate, I guess I will stop ranting if it is simply falling on deaf ears.