Author

Topic: [ANN][MAX] MAXcoin - PoW, ASIC Resistance, Keccak GPU Mining - page 113. (Read 914323 times)

newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Reorder and his accomplice onliner are suspected of the attack on the competitor pool! He has stolen money from users, that were fully paid back from own funds!!

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2419.msg31155#msg31155
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2419.msg31827#msg31827

You know you'd better come up with a proof for an accusation like this.

Cannot stop it?..

I came to memorycoin as a pool with 1.5%fee some time later as you still had ca.90% of hashrate with your 3.5%fees. People were glad to get a more fair pool, but suddenly after a significant part of miners came to dwarfpool, it has been attacked from two hackers who knows exactly about the source code of Memorycoin-wallet, source code of miners, an algorithm of Momentum with Birthday collisions on the lowest level.

Such a specific use of vulnerability on the crypto-level could be only known to the developers of coin, pool or miner-software. That are only a few persons on the world have this background and can make such attack so quickly: developer of Memorycoin, developer of the 1th pool, developer of yam-miner and Reorder (russian developer of miners and owner of biggest pool).
The attacker-management addresses are known. One and main of them is from Russia. I find that's really very suspicious!

Furthermore, you and "onliner" slander dwarfpool of stealing shares, pool, money whenever possible without any evidence!
That's strange, I do not even touch you, but as you (or your accomplice) said it yourself: "He that commits a fault thinks everyone speaks of it"..  To lead a pool is very responsibly, it is matter of trust, I'd never wish to be a user of a pool whose owner's get such thoughts like yours..
You khow, my reputation is the most important thing for me, I paid all that was stolen from my users! dwarfpool has the most transparent stats!


Now, as an op of anonymous pool, I do not even see a possiblility to 'steal' from it to anyone but owner. There are no logins, how does one change the payment address at all? I take it that you have stolen from your users yourself and when this did not work out, did not even bother to make up a good excuse. Just started pointing fingers randomly.

Your reputation is only that of an avid and talented README changer, and everybody can see that: https://github.com/Atrides?tab=activity . An astounding contribution to the opensource!

Please do your shady things with your poor miners as you like, but get off my back already.




Guys, you really overact!! I never began this SHIT, but do not expect me to be silent on your vile slander everywhere!!
I'd say you are too aware for someone who does not deal with this attack.

I'm not a moron to rob my users after some weeks of hard work on a pool. Anyone who bought pool code wont be able to understand this, sorry.
This is also not my end work, I'm preparing a large project based on pool's knowledge and experience. In addition, I have been successfully leading a service with about 100K users for many years, I khow well what is a reputation worth.

Stop it to poke me I'd stolen GPL code! That is absurdly!
And your astounding contribution do not mean you are white and fluffy

You already get the answer how to attack the anonymous pool, but for miners: The hackers sent many fake shares from several accounts (fake-shares bomb), thereby increased a part of his own shares at the expense of other users.

Do you consider the users here as idiots who cannot open a link and read it, who cannot distinguish the difference between attack on pool-level and a website-level?
Although this is your style to attract attention to insignificant details. Your actions just strengthen the suspicions against you.
 


Oh what's the news, the greatest part of the whole maxcoin hashrate is really not in honest hands
1gh.com not good for maxcoin
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
try to remove:  -w 256, --lookup-gap 2, --thread-concurrency 32765, -I 13
Quote
a bigger psu? 300W per card = 1200W, you are right at the limit.
an r9 290 can make 450 with a bit of overclock, but not in your case, cause of not enough current.

thanks I know I'm at the limit, will upgrade to dual psu soon. nice to know that the settings are not bad anyway.
Tried without -w 256, --lookup-gap 2, --thread-concurrency 32765, -I 13 and it's +- the same.
full member
Activity: 157
Merit: 100
I am creating a giveaway faucet to promote MaxCoin.

Please support me and this project by donate some coins to mc3Dev2PQVjw5NnoHGgGDoyHsWbHcvSwHL

If we want to make MAXcoin big, we need projects like this.
Thank you.

Just like I said on your topic;
I don't think a faucet is that big of a project.
Why don't you make it first and then ask people to donate some coins to get it running.

Take a look at http://www.economyforums.com/
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
We're not in Wonderland anymore Alice
I am creating a giveaway faucet to promote MaxCoin.

Please support me and this project by donate some coins to mGHdygFFRo2NP7FfGsmX3HAAY8gBNHtnd9

If we want to make MAXcoin big, we need projects like this.
Thank you.

If you want to promote MaxCoin, sell goods for maxcoin. There is no value in money which people get for free
+1
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
anything that could be improved?
try to remove:  -w 256, --lookup-gap 2, --thread-concurrency 32765, -I 13
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
anything that could be improved?

a bigger psu? 300W per card = 1200W, you are right at the limit.
an r9 290 can make 450 with a bit of overclock, but not in your case, cause of not enough current.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
anything that could be improved?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Hello guys

I just wanted to double check my minig Settings with you.

I have 4x Sapphire R9 290 on a Gigabyte X79 UD3 board. 1200W PSU. 2 GPUs are on passive 1x  Raisers.

My Maxcoin config is

Quote
--no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://mypool:0000 -u myuser.myworker -p mypwd -g 1 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 32765 -I 13 --temp-overheat 92 --auto-fan --temp-target=82 --gpu-engine 900 --gpu-memclock 1150 --gpu-powertune 0

It Looks to be stable since 30 minutes @ 1.58Gh/s

What do you think of it? what can I make better? Usually I use to mine scrypt with -I20 but it Looks like it's not safe for keccak

thanks in advance
1.58Gh/s = 1580 MH/s / 4 = 395 MH/s (R9 290) good result

update
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Hello guys

I just wanted to double check my minig Settings with you.

I have 4x Sapphire R9 290 on a Gigabyte X79 UD3 board. 1200W PSU. 2 GPUs are on passive 1x  Raisers.

My Maxcoin config is

Quote
--no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://mypool:0000 -u myuser.myworker -p mypwd -g 1 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 32765 -I 13 --temp-overheat 92 --auto-fan --temp-target=82 --gpu-engine 900 --gpu-memclock 1150 --gpu-powertune 0

It Looks to be stable since 30 minutes @ 1.58Gh/s

What do you think of it? what can I make better? Usually I use to mine scrypt with -I20 but it Looks like it's not safe for keccak

thanks in advance
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100
I am creating a giveaway faucet to promote MaxCoin.

Please support me and this project by donate some coins to mGHdygFFRo2NP7FfGsmX3HAAY8gBNHtnd9

If we want to make MAXcoin big, we need projects like this.
Thank you.

If you want to promote MaxCoin, sell goods for maxcoin. There is no value in money which people get for free
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I am creating a giveaway faucet to promote MaxCoin.

Please support me and this project by donate some coins to mGHdygFFRo2NP7FfGsmX3HAAY8gBNHtnd9

If we want to make MAXcoin big, we need projects like this.
Thank you.

Just like I said on your topic;
I don't think a faucet is that big of a project.
Why don't you make it first and then ask people to donate some coins to get it running.
full member
Activity: 157
Merit: 100
I am creating a giveaway faucet to promote MaxCoin.

Please support me and this project by donate some coins to mc3Dev2PQVjw5NnoHGgGDoyHsWbHcvSwHL

If we want to make MAXcoin big, we need projects like this.
Thank you.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Is this shit profitable?

good profitable.
example, 5xR280X = 1650 MHs = cgminer for ATI GPU version 3.7.3 from http://max.1gh.com/ = 37 maxcoin or more = 24 USD per day.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
Is this shit profitable?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0

Visit us at http://bluecoinstock.com/public/market/24 and see charts about the last trades, the volume market, historical price & price calculator!!
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
You already get the answer how to attack the anonymous pool, but for miners: The hackers sent many fake shares from several accounts (fake-shares bomb), thereby increased a part of his own shares at the expense of other users.

Do you consider the users here as idiots who cannot open a link and read it, who cannot distinguish the difference between attack on pool-level and a website-level?
Although this is your style to attract attention to insignificant details. Your actions just strengthen the suspicions against you.

You, a useless parasite, have accused me for stealing something from you, so how is this an overreaction? Let alone it is something that cannot possibly be stolen as the common sense tells. What in the world a 'fake share' is anyway?
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Admin of DwarfPool.com
Reorder and his accomplice onliner are suspected of the attack on the competitor pool! He has stolen money from users, that were fully paid back from own funds!!

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2419.msg31155#msg31155
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2419.msg31827#msg31827

You know you'd better come up with a proof for an accusation like this.

Cannot stop it?..

I came to memorycoin as a pool with 1.5%fee some time later as you still had ca.90% of hashrate with your 3.5%fees. People were glad to get a more fair pool, but suddenly after a significant part of miners came to dwarfpool, it has been attacked from two hackers who knows exactly about the source code of Memorycoin-wallet, source code of miners, an algorithm of Momentum with Birthday collisions on the lowest level.

Such a specific use of vulnerability on the crypto-level could be only known to the developers of coin, pool or miner-software. That are only a few persons on the world have this background and can make such attack so quickly: developer of Memorycoin, developer of the 1th pool, developer of yam-miner and Reorder (russian developer of miners and owner of biggest pool).
The attacker-management addresses are known. One and main of them is from Russia. I find that's really very suspicious!

Furthermore, you and "onliner" slander dwarfpool of stealing shares, pool, money whenever possible without any evidence!
That's strange, I do not even touch you, but as you (or your accomplice) said it yourself: "He that commits a fault thinks everyone speaks of it"..  To lead a pool is very responsibly, it is matter of trust, I'd never wish to be a user of a pool whose owner's get such thoughts like yours..
You khow, my reputation is the most important thing for me, I paid all that was stolen from my users! dwarfpool has the most transparent stats!


Now, as an op of anonymous pool, I do not even see a possiblility to 'steal' from it to anyone but owner. There are no logins, how does one change the payment address at all? I take it that you have stolen from your users yourself and when this did not work out, did not even bother to make up a good excuse. Just started pointing fingers randomly.

Your reputation is only that of an avid and talented README changer, and everybody can see that: https://github.com/Atrides?tab=activity . An astounding contribution to the opensource!

Please do your shady things with your poor miners as you like, but get off my back already.




Guys, you really overact!! I never began this SHIT, but do not expect me to be silent on your vile slander everywhere!!
I'd say you are too aware for someone who does not deal with this attack.

I'm not a moron to rob my users after some weeks of hard work on a pool. Anyone who bought pool code wont be able to understand this, sorry.
This is also not my end work, I'm preparing a large project based on pool's knowledge and experience. In addition, I have been successfully leading a service with about 100K users for many years, I khow well what is a reputation worth.

Stop it to poke me I'd stolen GPL code! That is absurdly!
And your astounding contribution do not mean you are white and fluffy

You already get the answer how to attack the anonymous pool, but for miners: The hackers sent many fake shares from several accounts (fake-shares bomb), thereby increased a part of his own shares at the expense of other users.

Do you consider the users here as idiots who cannot open a link and read it, who cannot distinguish the difference between attack on pool-level and a website-level?
Although this is your style to attract attention to insignificant details. Your actions just strengthen the suspicions against you.
 

full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
CoinTweak profitability charts
And has gotten it's private calculator which can be found at https://cointweak.com/calculator/coin/max

Quote
Coin    Difficulty    Coin reward/day    Exchange rate BTC    Exchange rate USD    Revenue/day    Days to create 1 BTC
Maxcoin    97876.11403570    10.6547228122    0.00115001 ?    0.6195333872    $6.6    81.61

Please change it to mh/s asap.
What exactly do you mean? If you want to calculate for 100 megahashes you can enter 100000 at the kilohashes field. Unfortunatly because I support multiple algorythms I can't just swap it to MH/s. For the overview I tried to get a hashrate as equal as possible to the 1000KH/s for scrypt, which in my opinion is very close to the 540MH/s currently being used. If you disagree with that then please provide me with some statistics or other info sources where I can see the proof and I will adjust it.

I did input the correct number of kh/s but a change to mh/s would make it easier and it would also look better as well as give your calculator a more professional feel.
I'll see if I can make it variable with the algorythm used, it may however cause more confusion then it would make it easier to use.
Jump to: