All I'm seeing is Coinler a bit disillusioned with the devs being hesitant allowing a 3rd party anon developer on the team at this stage,
and dumping his 300k coins. There really isn't any need to panic , its just one person exiting his position. which means more cheap Minerals for the rest of us,
anything under 2k is cheap imo.
As previously quoted the dev said he's interested in Anon , but is not a priority until after the website.
A basic Anon Functionality can easily be incorporated into the website anyways, similar to cloaking via exchanges.
I don't mind paying the bill for anon implementation myself.
Oh and reminder to keep voting , would love to see minerals on mintpal , and not have to buy on bittrex.
guess what. they couldve just communicated that to me. i have received 0 communication whatsoever. and that is bad sign for me as an investor. there was never any mention of hesitation to allow a 3rd party dev to assist via private community hire. in fact minerals dev earlier on supported the idea publicly and never published anything to suggest the contrary.
i know the dev says he's interested. but if he was more than interested we wouldnt have a bunch of investors losing confidence since the 2k. i read the market to be losing interest and so moves needed to be made to instill investor confidence. announcing anon to be implemented officially i believe wouldve easily accomplished that and pushed the price up again for another wave pushing more coin up over 2k. this is trading, marketing and investment strategy.
i dont care who does the anon. our dev, or another dev. as long as it gets done and is put into the project pipeline officially. and that's what i was asking for only. and showed that funding for this implementation could be raised rather easily from the community. all of it is a good show for onlooking investors. declining to comment affirmatively in a sense.. let them down.
finally.. no that wasnt and hasnt been me exiting. i dumped a few coins to pull out profit to re-invest just in case the price goes lower. it is committed to reinvesting in minerals if community developments take a direction i think will strengthen the coin's foundation. just a few thousand min around 1.9 and 1.5 marks. so i dont know how you came to your figures. what you're seeing and have been seeing since 2k is investors losing patience and confidence due to lack of communication. and me trying to provide a direction that will keep the price afloat. failing that any further investment and reinvestment will have to depend on my reading of the markets and community developments. i still hold some min. and wish well for the coin. nor do i wish to see it fail. but my involvement will need to be reserved if im going to be working with people who think im their rival.