I don't think it's possible to actually limit by IP. If you do that, there's a way to easily reroute the IP. Not everyone knows how to do it but it's going to give advantage to those who know how to do that. But I think holding wallet is a great idea so multipools cannot get in.
Topic: [ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution | - page 421. (Read 742176 times)
we are thinking of limiting account to 1 worker. So we can delete all workers except 1 for every account and prevent creating more then 1 worker per account. 50 Hh/s limit per worker will persist
What do you guys think?
What do you guys think?
"Limiting max hash rate per worker" is a joke.Farmer can use different worker name for each rig.You should limit the total hash rate per username.Even this can't prevent farmer.They can register more username if it's profitable.So why not go to exchange only after POW end. Boostcoin is a good model since it is on exchange after lauched about 7 days.
Is there any exchange? Or whats going on here?
edit:Without releasing source its probably not possible for exchanges to add MIN
edit:Without releasing source its probably not possible for exchanges to add MIN
if you don't publish the wallet. how the exchange add MIN?
exchange is ok now?
Dev please tell us when it be on popular exchanges?
Asics and Multipools are an obvioius cheat so we don't have them.
Cmon now. Cheats? Seriously? Multipools are made up of hashers just like your 6 private pools, there is 0 difference.
So by cheat I'm pretty he meant in his context that you harm the coin.
If pools really wanted to help coins they'd at least go the p2pool route.
We are working on limiting big miners right now
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
What will you do with the coins they have made?
they will not be making coins, just more rejected shares
I know, but what will happend with the coins they have made until they get the rejected shares?
you mean the coins you have made dumbass it was your name as top hash
on euro pool who are you kiddihng lol!!
exchange is ok now?
Asics and Multipools are an obvioius cheat so we don't have them.
Cmon now. Cheats? Seriously? Multipools are made up of hashers just like your 6 private pools, there is 0 difference.
We are working on limiting big miners right now
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
What will you do with the coins they have made?
they will not be making coins, just more rejected shares
I know, but what will happend with the coins they have made until they get the rejected shares?
depends on the limit development. If it takes too long we will have to start locking big hashers manually for 2 weeks in attempt to scare em away. We will announce 1-2 hours before we decide to take measure like this. But the issue with big miners have gone too far and we are going to fix it one way or annother
ip restricion isn't the best way to do it. We wanted to prevent asics and multipools away from Minerals and we've done that. But IP limiting will filter out many people who want to have their share of Minerals. For example why is bad if a guy rents a small rig? With IP limit he won't be able to do that. Also if a large number of people use same IP they will be fileterd out as well
The important goal for us is to distrubute Minerals fairly across everyone who is willing to mine. We don't want to filter out vast numbers of people, its not good for the coin.
Asics and Multipools are an obvioius cheat so we don't have them. Small farms and rentals are somewhat fair as long they are small (less then 50 Mh/s)
So ban people who have more than 50 MH per account. Anounce this and give them 2 hours to go below 50. Do this quick or the coin's whole idea is lost. Such a great idea if it succeeds ... Good luck :-)
We are working on limiting big miners right now
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
What will you do with the coins they have made?
they will not be making coins, just more rejected shares
I know, but what will happend with the coins they have made until they get the rejected shares?
depends on the limit development. If it takes too long we will have to start locking big hashers manually for 2 weeks in attempt to scare em away. We will announce 1-2 hours before we decide to take measure like this. But the issue with big miners have gone too far and we are going to fix it one way or annother
ip restricion isn't the best way to do it. We wanted to prevent asics and multipools away from Minerals and we've done that. But IP limiting will filter out many people who want to have their share of Minerals. For example why is bad if a guy rents a small rig? With IP limit he won't be able to do that. Also if a large number of people use same IP they will be fileterd out as well
The important goal for us is to distrubute Minerals fairly across everyone who is willing to mine. We don't want to filter out vast numbers of people, its not good for the coin.
Asics and Multipools are an obvioius cheat so we don't have them. Small farms and rentals are somewhat fair as long they are small (less then 50 Mh/s)
MiMIMiner cares about his uberfarm
Limit those Hashrates !
1 MiMiMiner 462,472 68,960.192
2 anonymous 169,903 25,334.647
3 anonymous 157,498 23,484.829
4 anonymous 119,315 17,791.315
5 anonymous 114,789 17,116.356
6 anonymous 104,461 15,576.314
7 bitter27 101,259 15,098.874
8 Corsair 100,279 14,952.830
9 anonymous 99,702 14,866.712
10 anonymous 95,225 14,199.251
11 quark 94,279 14,058.201
12 FancyDancy 86,744 12,934.634
13 eon 82,339 12,277.772
14 anonymous 79,033 11,784.805
15 teomihsav 78,161 11,654.795
1 MiMiMiner 462,472 68,960.192
2 anonymous 169,903 25,334.647
3 anonymous 157,498 23,484.829
4 anonymous 119,315 17,791.315
5 anonymous 114,789 17,116.356
6 anonymous 104,461 15,576.314
7 bitter27 101,259 15,098.874
8 Corsair 100,279 14,952.830
9 anonymous 99,702 14,866.712
10 anonymous 95,225 14,199.251
11 quark 94,279 14,058.201
12 FancyDancy 86,744 12,934.634
13 eon 82,339 12,277.772
14 anonymous 79,033 11,784.805
15 teomihsav 78,161 11,654.795
We are working on limiting big miners right now
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
What will you do with the coins they have made?
they will not be making coins, just more rejected shares
I know, but what will happend with the coins they have made until they get the rejected shares?
depends on the limit development. If it takes too long we will have to start locking big hashers manually for 2 weeks in attempt to scare em away. We will announce 1-2 hours before we decide to take measure like this. But the issue with big miners have gone too far and we are going to fix it one way or annother
We are working on limiting big miners right now
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
What will you do with the coins they have made?
they will not be making coins, just more rejected shares
I know, but what will happend with the coins they have made until they get the rejected shares?
depends on the limit development. If it takes too long we will have to start locking big hashers manually for 2 weeks in attempt to scare em away. We will announce 1-2 hours before we decide to take measure like this. But the issue with big miners have gone too far and we are going to fix it one way or annother
does this happen to anyone else in their sgminer:
network diff set to
stratum detected new block
network diff set to
stratum detected new block
network diff set to
stratum detected new block
accepted share
accepted share
network diff set to
stratum detected new block
network diff set to
stratum detected new block,
accepted share
it barley every comes up with accepted shares just the new block and diff, my other miners are getting loads of shares.
its still detecting the correct hashrate on pools so it must still be submitting shares??
network diff set to
stratum detected new block
network diff set to
stratum detected new block
network diff set to
stratum detected new block
accepted share
accepted share
network diff set to
stratum detected new block
network diff set to
stratum detected new block,
accepted share
it barley every comes up with accepted shares just the new block and diff, my other miners are getting loads of shares.
its still detecting the correct hashrate on pools so it must still be submitting shares??
It's every worker has to <50M to anti asic
It's ok if they use bunch of VGA and total hash rate > 50M
And i think it's good if devs changes limit from 50 -> 25Mh/worker
I thought the real point was to make the coin more evenly distributed throughout the community. People running these farms generating 900 Mh/s are for sure going to dump the coin as soon as it hits exchanges. If we actually did try and limit the big farms it would be much more interesting price discovery on the markets.It's ok if they use bunch of VGA and total hash rate > 50M
And i think it's good if devs changes limit from 50 -> 25Mh/worker
You are totaly wrong, don't compare farms with multipools. Farms are the biggest bagholders. We couldn't pay our electricity bill If we would dump our coins right after mining them. Only way for us to make some profit is to hold all coins until one of them reaches a good value, only than we start to drop slowly so the price wont be affected to much. Of course this happens only to 1 out of 20 coins more or less. For example, the last good profit we made with libertycoin, we had 780k and sold them for over 100 BTC, because we was holding them. Right now we hold tons of priceless coins, so please think a bit before you compare us with multipools. Btw, we are xdata on scv.minerals.pro
True that!
It's every worker has to <50M to anti asic
It's ok if they use bunch of VGA and total hash rate > 50M
And i think it's good if devs changes limit from 50 -> 25Mh/worker
I thought the real point was to make the coin more evenly distributed throughout the community. People running these farms generating 900 Mh/s are for sure going to dump the coin as soon as it hits exchanges. If we actually did try and limit the big farms it would be much more interesting price discovery on the markets.It's ok if they use bunch of VGA and total hash rate > 50M
And i think it's good if devs changes limit from 50 -> 25Mh/worker
You are totaly wrong, don't compare farms with multipools. Farms are the biggest bagholders. We couldn't pay our electricity bill If we would dump our coins right after mining them. Only way for us to make some profit is to hold all coins until one of them reaches a good value, only than we start to drop slowly so the price wont be affected to much. Of course this happens only to 1 out of 20 coins more or less. For example, the last good profit we made with libertycoin, we had 780k and sold them for over 100 BTC, because we was holding them. Right now we hold tons of priceless coins, so please think a bit before you compare us with multipools. Btw, we are xdata on scv.minerals.pro
We are working on limiting big miners right now
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
What will you do with the coins they have made?
they will not be making coins, just more rejected shares
I know, but what will happend with the coins they have made until they get the rejected shares?
Jump to: