Topic: [ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution | - page 53. (Read 742176 times)
nope no anon plz, just focus on dota2!!!
Quote
it might be too late. dont't be surprised if with anon nothing happens to price.
Clearly, there is a sizable number of people on here gagging for anon. It's sensible to conclude building this will boost the price by increasing the buy side of the equation. A well executed anon feature cannot possibly hurt the price, so what's not to like? 
release that fucking anon plz, it will only set a new floor, which is what min need right now, actually you should've released it long time ago...
it might be too late. dont't be surprised if with anon nothing happens to price. 
release that fucking anon plz, it will only set a new floor, which is what min need right now, actually you should've released it long time ago...
Fully agreed.
+1
+1
But the esc coin price is crashing lol
No wonder you are here, ESC is hemorrhaging value - Market Cap $ 19,454.
Buy yourself some MIN and relax
But the esc coin price is crashing lol
On the anon subject, whether you believe it is desirable or not for a gambling alt, you have to appreciate that adding anon applies leverage to the value of all the current features of Minerals. So, to my mind, it is a no-brainer - if it can be implemented well, it should be top of the to-do list. If a good technical solution is not immediately apparent to the developers, it should be postponed, however it *should* be delivered at some point. Personally, I would aim for sooner, rather than later, to de-risk the danger that lack of anon is hurting MIN.
release that fucking anon plz, it will only set a new floor, which is what min need right now, actually you should've released it long time ago...
Fully agreed.
release that fucking anon plz, it will only set a new floor, which is what min need right now, actually you should've released it long time ago...
Yeah I am curious about the redesign idea...what are your thoughts and ideas.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I would vote for anon instead redesign, we used a lot of coins for the tournament, next one will not be for 75.000 Mins, I think we will not get more than 50.000 (i'd love to be wrong). So, we need something to push the value. I we could achieve 10k per mineral, tournament should be atractive with a prize of 10.000 mins.
Dev team said they are going to fund next tournament. I believe, there are still will be people donating, what is 50k, like 10 ppl donating 1k, pff
I might whilling to donate a decent amount myself.
you mean 50 ppls donating 1k... that is a lot... not an easy task
or 100 people donating 500
. its easy on the pocket, we just need the massesIf value goes to 10k (or something like that), a 10.000 prize, would sound very interesting and we can fund more tournaments, collecting 50.000 per tournament it is just too much, 50.000 is almost %0.2 of total coins.
If prices goes to 10k sats, 50k isnt too much considering Mid tier tournaments are around 3-10k$
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-tournaments/438453-bitcoin-starcraft-scarlett-vs-naniwa-for-14btc
STFU weak fud attempt, Minerals is one of the few altcoins with proven real life use.
Hot news....no next plans..... Minerals & MineralsPR offline....the end...
Only way to find out where the price would go is to implement anon. Maybe it goes over 10k and the tournaments can become top tier in prize money. I dont think Minerals will be dumped low after that because anon would be a secondary matter after its already proven real life betting use.
Yeah I am curious about the redesign idea...what are your thoughts and ideas.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I would vote for anon instead redesign, we used a lot of coins for the tournament, next one will not be for 75.000 Mins, I think we will not get more than 50.000 (i'd love to be wrong). So, we need something to push the value. I we could achieve 10k per mineral, tournament should be atractive with a prize of 10.000 mins.
Dev team said they are going to fund next tournament. I believe, there are still will be people donating, what is 50k, like 10 ppl donating 1k, pff
I might whilling to donate a decent amount myself.
you mean 50 ppls donating 1k... that is a lot... not an easy task
or 100 people donating 500
. its easy on the pocket, we just need the massesIf value goes to 10k (or something like that), a 10.000 prize, would sound very interesting and we can fund more tournaments, collecting 50.000 per tournament it is just too much, 50.000 is almost %0.2 of total coins.
If prices goes to 10k sats, 50k isnt too much considering Mid tier tournaments are around 3-10k$
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-tournaments/438453-bitcoin-starcraft-scarlett-vs-naniwa-for-14btc
Yeah I am curious about the redesign idea...what are your thoughts and ideas.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I would vote for anon instead redesign, we used a lot of coins for the tournament, next one will not be for 75.000 Mins, I think we will not get more than 50.000 (i'd love to be wrong). So, we need something to push the value. I we could achieve 10k per mineral, tournament should be atractive with a prize of 10.000 mins.
Dev team said they are going to fund next tournament. I believe, there are still will be people donating, what is 50k, like 10 ppl donating 1k, pff
I might whilling to donate a decent amount myself.
you mean 50 ppls donating 1k... that is a lot... not an easy task
or 100 people donating 500
. its easy on the pocket, we just need the massesIf value goes to 10k (or something like that), a 10.000 prize, would sound very interesting and we can fund more tournaments, collecting 50.000 per tournament it is just too much, 50.000 is almost %0.2 of total coins.
well anon is 2nd on poll! 
Yeah I am curious about the redesign idea...what are your thoughts and ideas.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I would vote for anon instead redesign, we used a lot of coins for the tournament, next one will not be for 75.000 Mins, I think we will not get more than 50.000 (i'd love to be wrong). So, we need something to push the value. I we could achieve 10k per mineral, tournament should be atractive with a prize of 10.000 mins.
Dev team said they are going to fund next tournament. I believe, there are still will be people donating, what is 50k, like 10 ppl donating 1k, pff
I might whilling to donate a decent amount myself.
you mean 50 ppls donating 1k... that is a lot... not an easy task
or 100 people donating 500
. its easy on the pocket, we just need the masses Yeah I am curious about the redesign idea...what are your thoughts and ideas.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I still think VPN might be a good idea...but what do I know.
I would vote for anon instead redesign, we used a lot of coins for the tournament, next one will not be for 75.000 Mins, I think we will not get more than 50.000 (i'd love to be wrong). So, we need something to push the value. I we could achieve 10k per mineral, tournament should be atractive with a prize of 10.000 mins.
Dev team said they are going to fund next tournament. I believe, there are still will be people donating, what is 50k, like 10 ppl donating 1k, pff
I might whilling to donate a decent amount myself.
you mean 50 ppls donating 1k... that is a lot... not an easy task
Jump to: