Hello,
I have a post on the biggest Dutch webpage about the new wallet and block-explorer
My English ain`t that good, so it`s in Dutch, still this webpage has around 400 unique visitors each day ( lot of Dutch, German visitors) So this must be good for mooncoin visibility.
Also i think the official topic must be opened here and other website`s to.
My artikle
http://www.bitcoinupdate.nl/home/mooncoin-heeft-een-nieuwe-wallet Hey, please take that off, there. That is NO quote from the new topic, only from my posting with the working copy. The new wallet is NOT out yet.
Please wait, until we post the new thread here. We are working on it. Thanks.
Same goes for the poster on Litecointalk.org
EDIT: As nice as it is to see, that people are enthusiastic about MOON, as said we need a concerted action. And for that we need patience. False information does no good.
I do not get it?
Why is it publish here?
It was published here only in this existing thread to have a working copy and letting the people having a say on that before going live in a fully new topic. And some have already made important notes via PM and we should consider those. peme is working hard on the new wallet. As far as I have gotten it, he is now testing the Mac-version after having confirmed a working Windows-wallet.
Must be my bad English. Already reposed it on my website. Will edit that the new wallet is not there yet.
Still the artice is good for the mooncoin i guess
Please read, what I have added above.
An article about Mooncoin is nice, right. But please use correct information.
Posting the copied text there is no good, since copying is no good journalism anyway. Edit: OK, have seen, that it was meant as a quote. But still: it is not yet the "official" text. Again: Please delete that article, since it is wrong from the ground up. The litecointalk.org-page is NO official page
Edit:, unless deaconboogie posted it. Please read my edit above.
EDIT 2:
Since I don't want to sound ignorant, arrogant or such: I have been contacted by many of the community to work on the new topic-text. That is what I am doing now. I am not deaconboogie and find it sad, that he has been away for so long now. But we must carry on, that is why we need a new start without him. Hence many people are working together. And to get the best possible result, we have to do the right things. That sometimes takes a little longer than making a hasty reaction. But most probably the result will be better, if we take the time, good quality needs. And MOON really deserves the best, don't you think?
EDIT 3:
While we are at calling something "official". What should we do now, regarding this? If we start the new topic, should we call it the official one? Or should we use another terminology? I was thinking about that for some time now ...
1 Will look at it, its a quote
2 Yes moon deserves best. I do not think deaconboogie is gone,
He is just imitating satoshi nakatomi, And reading this probably right now
I have a email address if needed..you already have that one i guess
3 Just call it official, you even made a new moonchain.
Will lighten-up his lates moves
His wallets: 2F4E859vh1ezhpdDnMZdcR4hS1gLn54ytf
I believe this is his amazon account:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A18AY69GN36AR8/ref=cm_cr_rdp_pdp Last review a pet: September 03, 2014
(why do i believe that can be find
here) and
here and
picture is used in moon topic as well.
Can it be deaconboogie posted on litecoin forum? And this guy Syntaks / twoturtles , he know?
I don't think so. Why would he post now, after several weeks of not showing up and then there, via an account with only two prior postings? It would really make more sense, to update the first posting of this thread by himself before, or wait, until we have started the new thread. If he really reads all of this thread, he will know
exactly, what is going on with his coin. And would know, that it does not make any sense, to only copy the working-edition of our planned new threads starting-post.
If you read all of deaconboogie's available postings thoroughly and try to understand his nature, then you know that he most probably wouldn't do that. Especially, because he chooses his words carefully and would not add something like that:
Just check the link, having nothing to do with Mooncoin at all. It leads to some thread discussing mining-things.
Furthermore the Mooncoin-logo/-icon has a white background. That also shows, that the poster does not really care about Mooncoin.
deaconboogie or one of his mates would surely not have done it in such a sloppy way.
EDIT: And why would he only stupidly copy that, without any referencing to this thread right at the beginning and to my posting of the original text especially, explaining that it is only a working edition of the new starting-post? That does not make any sense.For me it seems, as if the poster is only a dude, who's into mining, maybe mined a bunch of Mooncoins and/or bought some and now tries to drive the price up, by doing an (uncoordinated) action - only out of personal motivation, simply because he is impatient and ignorant. As you can see, even the price did not appreciate this unconcerted action.
So, please stop that. As it does not help. Who will maintain that thread there reasonably, if it is not attuned to us, the community, trying to get Mooncoin back on its track in the most appropriate way?
So ZetaOS, why are you still featuring that posting as the "official topic" on your news/blog-page and did not take the blog-page down, like advised, as it contains wrong information already in the URL ("mooncoin-heeft-een-nieuwe-wallet" - despite of you knowing that the new wallet is not released yet)?
If you really have an email-address of deaconboogie, please hand it over to me via PM, so that I can contact him directly, to talk about doing the right actions and to verify, that the username "Mooncoin" on litecointalk.org is owned by him or one of his mates, you mentioned.
We should really work
together, to get the best for Mooncoin. Thank you.