Topic: [ANN][NIM] - Nimiq - The Browser Based Blockchain - page 63. (Read 131288 times)

I tell you, Wekkel is not an investor. He is just a miner who is dumping this shit over buyers. He doesn't care about nimiq. He only cares that he can have time to dump more coins on more naive investors.

Reality: In the last two weeks we lost another 25%.

Typical defense mechanism of a naive investor:

THE PROJECT IS A SCAM. I LOST 99.999% of my investment. Simple as that.

Nimiq humming along just fine.

What's up?

The project is a complete scam. ICO investors lost 99.99% of their investments, while they smoke weed and east sushi in costa rica. The founder of the project, a severe cannabis drug abuser was removed from the project to enable his teammates to hijack the project and turned it into a scam. They present in their youtube vlogs as this disruptive new blockchain while in reality it is worst than bitcoin blockchain. ICO investors ask for a refund. The project is doomed and they know this, but they want to continue the scam.

project scam scam! price goes down to 0. devs left. source code no update... nimex echange closed. project is dead. devs don't talk with us. ledger no longer works. no update. just empty promises. q4 promises not delivered. project dead. ico investors scammed. bankruptcy is near. digging not profitable

yes yes. many people think they do a 10 million dollar exit scam. problem is we can't do much to stop them. what can we do chinese diggers are not happy with nimiq trash. electricity is expensive even in china... not worth digging nimiq.. project dead.. they only prepare 10 million dollar exit scam for their pocket. when new transparency report with btc address??? who is in charge? nobody? Robin Linus the drug abuser or who is in charge?? chinese community is worried that project get closed. after philipool, beepool, nimipet and nimex shut down, chinese people believe nimiq shutdown soon in a few months.. project doesn't look good. it looks like a scam for investors. project dead. stupid investors lost millions of dollars.

"Norman Alsbander" aka Marvin Wissfeld, aka nimiq sock puppet recently created a fake survey.

Investors want a refund but Marvin faked the results to make it look as if investors don't want a refund.


https://www.reddit.com/r/Nimiq/comments/ad4mc0/nimiq_community_survey/eel47mr/

@normana aka Marvin aka hypocrite, you should stop hiding behind fake accounts if you really care about transparency.

CAUTION!
"normana" is a FAKE ACCOUNT of team nimiq.
They are preparing a 10 MILLION DOLLAR EXIT SCAM!

The project is simply dead. I heard that they want to do another scam!!!! They are planning to switch from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake in order to mine using the Genesis Funds. They have billions of coins for themselves to mine POS. They not only scammed the ICO investors, now the want to scam the entire community and all the miners!!!!! SHITCOIN AND SCAM!!! FUCKING SCAMMERS AND SCUMBAGS

yes yes!! great great news!! nimex shit exchange closed down. in 6 months nimiq will close as well

Haha today Nimex a shit exchange closed down. This shit just keeps getting piled higher and higher. The smell of stinking shit is starting to get overwhelming.

big big disappointment. project is dead. sushi pool fighting skypool because they accuse skypool to steal source code for pools. devs left the project. team scammed ico investors. there are less than 50 miners who are mining 90% of coins. nimiq is doomed and a big big failure. ico investors want money back. project is really bad and not worth it. 100% it will fail.

Wow excited to find out what the inside info is. This shitcoin is full of surprises!

Hehehe   . First of all, the project is clinically dead. Secondly, the project indeed was hijacked by Philipp, Marvin, and Elion from cannabis drug abuser Robin Linus and transformed into a scam to launder all ICO money from stupid investors like me. They wasted 1.1 million dollar ICO money buying a villa in costa rica from one of their investors.  Today I got another insider information which blows everybody's mind. I will need to wait a few more days to confirm my insider information before releasing it to the public.

Thank you for your warning! This project seemed quite interesting for me in the past, but taking on mind facts you quoted I will rather avoid this project and don't waste more of my time.

Who is Marvin?


They can always have more accounts than the one I found. I would expect them to transfer smaller funds from the multi-signature wallet to a single-signature wallet, so they can have easier access (UX for most multi-signature wallets just sucks).

Also I just rechecked my numbers, and they actually have more than 6500 ETH (my 6400 ETH was rounded down, so it was my fault, not theirs): 1,073.38518119 ETH (@ 0xEFa351D189c367D109859AFdF6f3D17EEb0825a5) + 5,457.0405 ETH (@ 0x847C590d780913B394290295A26EA172e12fFbF1) = 6530,42568119 ETH. Again this is a lower bound, they could easily have more than that. So it looks like they were actually not rounding up, but rounding down. Maybe they wanted to trick us into thinking they have less than they actually have.

The AmA was done on Jan 11, so you shouldn't take the whole 200k USD monthly burn rate, because this is only half a month ago, but only deduct something like 100k USD.

Also you are now taking today prices for BTC and ETH, so to be correct you should also evaluate the ICO funds accordingly: 60,000 ETH (which was what they got in the ICO) is 6,955,082.24 USD today. They still have 6500 ETH left, so they only invested 53,500 ETH, which is 6,202,149.78 USD today. From 6,202,149.78 USD they were able to diversify into 1.1 Mio. USD worth of real estate (not a villa, they said its empty land in the AmA), 5.1 Mio. USD in cash and 2,415,400.80 USD worth of BTC (680 BTC at current price). If we consider only the Cash and BTC as movable funds, they still managed to earn 1.3 Mio. USD (made 7.5 Mio. USD from 6.2 Mio. USD) beside buying the empty land and all compensations and payments. So if you take it that way, they actually performed very well and had a net positive first 1.5 years, to be precise it is +21%. (I am not really serious about this now, just saying that your calculation also doesn't make a lot of sense). Given that they already delivered way more than half of what they proposed during the ICO, even -50% would have been fine to me.

But I still don't know why they actually should lie at us around this numbers? Could you explain what they earn from putting wrong numbers out (which probably is illegal given they are a Swiss non-profit foundation)? I don't think these saying have any influence on the price of NIM and I also think they are not very interested in increasing the price of NIM (at least until now they did no marketing in that direction).

I totally understand that some investors (by the way, you are still pending to proof you actually are one) are upset about the price. I might be too if I hadn't earned more than I lost through clever trading (or luck) of NET and NIM. But fortunately for me, I am still net positive with my Nimiq investment and as such am not blinded for the progress they are doing (for example in scalability research or UX improvements). If the NIM price wasn't that low, nobody would even care about their financial details as we do right now...

I was an ICO investor, just like you. Believing in their scam dream presented by the Scam Master Himself  Robin Linus, the pothead. This ended up as a personal war with the scammers. I won't stop until the scammers will get busted by the authorities and put under bars.