I want an explanation from the Team Nimiq, unless you are team nimiq hiding behind an acronym. Robin Linus suspected you to be a member of team nimiq
I gave perfectly valid answers. We cannot bother the team to answer all your questions over and over again. They have better things to do than handle you 2-3 people with 6 accounts that just put a lot of effort in spamming this BitcoinTalk thread.
Also, you are again contradicting yourself: Either you believe that I am a member of Team Nimiq (even though I obviously am not), then you should be happy with a statement by me if you want a statement from the Team. Or you believe that I am not a member of Team Nimiq, then you shouldn't state that some other person suspects me because it adds no value to the discussion.
When I contributed to the ICO, my IP was not banned. Also, many Americans got into the ICO pre-sale because of this. It is literally impossible to ban all IPs from the United States, and I can confirm the fact that my IP was not banned during the token sale. Moreover, people could have contributed to the token sale being in the States as there was no KYC procedure at the time of the token sale. I am not a native american, but I do have American citizenship.
It is perfectly possible to ban or allow all IP addresses from a country, in fact that's what many websites do. Also you did not even proof you are a ICO contributor, neither proof you are a us citizen. Everybody can claim such things. Nonetheless, when I contributed to the ICO, it clearly asked me if I was a US citizen or not and it also had me confirm the terms (at
https://nimiq.com/terms/) that start with "IF YOU ARE A CITIZEN, RESIDENT, OR GREEN CARD HOLDER OF THE UNITED STATES OR IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THESE TERMS OF SALE, YOU CANNOT TAKE PART IN THE CROWDSALE". Also, if you are a US citizen, you would not have been able to activate your NIM because that process had a KYC, so you must have sold your NET already, which means you cannot be (as claimed) a NIM holder right now, which implies you have no rights for refunds.
Dude, probably you smoked to much pot. All the founders are Germans (Robin Linus, Philipp von Styp-Rekowsky, Pascal Berrang, Marvin Wissfeld (you) Elion Chin), the rest of the team are just regular employees.
OK, seems like you have some insider information here. In all the VLOGs and their team page (
https://nimiq.com/en/#team) they claim, only Robin, Philipp and Elion are "Nimiq Creator" (which to me sounds very much like founder). Also I read that Robin wants a third of the funds which aligns with the narrative of 3 founders. But as you seem to be an insider, you probably know better than me.
I have spotted 2 lies.
Lie no 1. They did not push any code in private repositories for Rust. By default, GitHub is showing as activities including the private commits in private repositories regarding Rust.
Lie no 2. I also checked the branches on the rust implementation. There are 3 branches with 5 commits in total. There is only one commit made by Pascal to the Rust implementation on a separate branch in the last 4 weeks.
Oh wow, so much stupidity here. I pointed out 4 things that you didn't consider and you claim that two of these these things are "lies", although you show that you actually did not consider before (so basically agree). Also GitHub can obviously only shows activity for things that happen in private commits *on GitHub* which is not what I stated (so you are saying I am lying by changing what I actually said). And finally you attach a screenshot to proof there was only activity on one branch in the last 4 week, when the screenshot actually says "Updated 21 days ago" and "Updated 23 days ago" for two branches that you did not include in your calculation, so even your proof is proving you wrong. Summary: both of the lies you spotted are in first place not even lies and in second actually do not proof me wrong in any way, I see it more as a confirmation that I was right...
Secondly, most of us want a full 1:1 full refund from the team nimiq for every ICO investor.
Most investors don't want full refund at ICO price, the community survey results are very clear:
https://imgur.com/8Cu54XA So it makes no sense to request a refund for every ICO investor. You of course can request a refund for you personally, but you did not provide any proof that you actually are an ICO investor. No proof, no refund, that's so easy.