This is very interesting,
"Dogecoin Founder Exits Crypto Community Citing 'Toxic' Culture" -
http://www.coindesk.com/dogecoin-founder-bitcoin-toxic/"The Australian native went on to present his opinion that digital currency participants have done little to create a community that is inclusive to all, citing the recent support of Kentucky Senator and US Tea Party member Rand Paul as evidence."
I'm glad I don't frequent the Doge forums... much more civilised here!
That is a very sad expression of frustrations. However, I totally understand the disgust like the Mintpal Moola experience he had to put up with.
DNotes clearly recognized that our industry needed a cultural change if digital currency were to gain mass acceptance. Money is an important tool as a medium of exchange, used by all people, irrespective of gender, race or net worth. We have work long and hard to ensure that everyone is treated with respect and get our full support when needed. We started out with the shared stake philosophy in an effort to get DNotes into the ownership of as many people as possible. Our CRISP For Students will continue that tradition for sometime so that many students will have some ownership of DNotes without having to pay for it to get started. This again is the DNotes difference and we will continue to help build a culture of mutual respect for mutual benefits.
I've seen similar feelings expressed by women involved in Bitcoin--this sense that it's very white male dominated and in some cases even exclusive. I've noticed that there are two aspects to the cryptosphere: The first is the technology itself and the various coins and so forth. That part of it doesn't really have any entry requirements other than figuring out the mechanics of setting up a wallet and transferring funds and then finding the right websites on which to conduct business. If you know how it works, then you can use it. In that sense it's very unbiased. Or, I guess the bias is in favor of those who are more computer savvy than most, but it's not like anyone out there can't learn and then be a part of it.
The second part of the cryptosphere is the aggregation of human beings who are involved, and whatever kinds of associations they have with each other which collectively makes up the "community." This is the part that I hear people complain about the most. Some of the people involved in the "community" are truly obnoxious. It's not hard to find them on this forum. Lots of the movers and shakers in the "community" are primarily people who are very good with computers but who maybe lack social skills and graces. Some of those people (I'm sure with the best of intentions) can make you feel like an idiot for asking a basic question or not understanding a concept that seems obvious to them. And even if you don't run afoul of anyone there are a lot of assumptions people make about you just because you're here--i.e., that you're a white male computer geek with a libertarian bent. On this last point I've for the most part not made any great effort to correct people's assumptions of who I am even when false. Most of the time it's not relevant to the discussion anyway.
For the last two years I've focused very much on the first aspect of the cryptosphere--the mechanics--and not worried too much about my involvement in the social aspects. Part of the beauty of cryptocurrency is that you really don't need a "community" per se to make it work. You just do your thing with your cryptos and the various block chains duly record it and the whole network is based on decentralized machines anyway. If I transact with someone using my cryptos, say I buy a coin on an exchange that someone else is selling, I really don't care if the person on the other end of the transaction likes me or agrees with my political views or even knows anything about me. The main thing that temporarily brings us together is the transaction, and then we go our separate ways. I put up with a lot of the rude stuff that's pretty common here and just focused on why I was here if things got rough.
Then I got more involved in CryptoMoms and started to see how much better it can be when people interact using basic grace and courtesy type of manners. Simple things like saying please and thank you and acknowledging that you at least heard the other person even if you don't agree with everything they said. And the beauty of basic professionalism. Also things like sandwiching difficult requests within very upbuilding and affirmative statements, and all around good conversations. That's making me start to rethink the importance of the social aspects of the cryptosphere, and see how much the lack of social graces that is so prevalent really truly is a turnoff to lots of people, and may even be an entry barrier. I've gotten involved with lots of projects here, mostly alt coins. On a technical level some are definitely better than others. Some have positively brilliant code underlying them. But I'm seeing that none of that matters if the community working on the project does not conduct itself in a professional manner both internally and in dealing with outsiders. From a technical perspective I'm not sure that DNotes has anything particularly brilliant going for it. It's a scrypt coin with no bells and whistles as far as I can tell, one of many. However, the DNotes development team and community hands down has the highest level of professionalism I've encountered anywhere in the cryptosphere. It's that high level of professionalism which is going to be the reason DNotes ultimately outshines many of the other alt coins which may be more technically brilliant but whose communities lack professionalism.
In conclusion the social aspects do matter, and they matter a great deal. Without good social graces and basic professionalism, people burn out and leave. The projects that are going to go mainstream and attract people from outside the cryptosphere are going to be the ones that are conducted with the utmost professionalism from day one.
With that said, when one encounters lack of professionalism in the cryptospace, the answer isn't complaining about it loudly and letting it get you down or leaving in a huff. The answer is to conduct oneself professionally and whenever possible, to create space where that professionalism is valued and nurtured. The DNotes developers and community have done just that. Very quietly and very effectively. I suspect I'm not the only one who's noticed.
Thank you very much for posting Wiser, I'm very pleased to get such a substantiated, and well communicated response - a shared experience many here will know from other threads. I have what I believe are pretty good theories as to why crypto is very 'white-male dominated', but those theories go beyond the scope of DNotes core mission and control. If you wanted a hint - think of ways in which 'libertarian' +/or 'white-males' would feel 'victimized' enough by Government / society that would create incentive to adopt Digital Currencies en masse.
Lots of the movers and shakers in the "community" are primarily people who are very good with computers but who maybe lack social skills and graces. Some of those people (I'm sure with the best of intentions) can make you feel like an idiot for asking a basic question or not understanding a concept that seems obvious to them... ...And even if you don't run afoul of anyone there are a lot of assumptions people make about you just because you're here--i.e., that you're a white male computer geek with a libertarian bent.I have in the past, wasted much time and effort in political circles on various social media to communicate the value of ideas for moral philosophy with others. To me, there were a set of 'first principles' that may not be voided (otherwise, they aren't principles!). I won't go into what these principles are, but applying logic to first principles tends to lead to a select few moral conclusions. I've painfully watched many friends with similar views attack others with vitriol, because they felt that opposition to their beliefs was 'evil'. I shared their frustration sometimes - you get called nasty names, and nobody seems to want to discuss the logic behind the issue - It's truly embarrassing that so many people in politics can not communicate effectively with those they disagree with. I find political environments to be the most toxic of all, and now steer clear and focus on more productive things. Socratic methods of getting a listener to accept logical propositions one by one is near impossible on the internet. Because it is true that people with anarcho-libertarian tendencies got the ball moving with crypto, I have sympathy for victims of the squabbling nature that people with such estranged views often bring with them. They are battle hardened from permanent disagreement with those around them, and their patience has long diminished for people they think 'don't get it'. That said, this is no excuse, and they are doing much harm to an industry they had a big part in creating.
Participating demographics are slowly changing with Digital Currencies now. Your point about the technology meaning nobody needs to care or know who the other transacting party is, or what their views were was excellent. I personally don't think any coin could truly achieve mass adoption without a core community that supports, grows, helps develop and advertises said coin. I think that any Digital Currency that rises to the top, will require more than just a really good development team to get there. A development team with a strong community will have a much larger pool of expertise to draw on than by themselves. Crypto is a commodity / transactional medium that requires people to use it. That means a community is required to market to and teach one another the benefits and it's uses. Without a good community, I don't think any amount of money used to advertise a crypto could get the level of adoption required to really challenge the big players in global payments. A strong community can.
As a thought experiment, think of a couple of years ago when Sony and Microsoft released their Playstation 4 and Xbox One consoles in the same month. Now many people prefer one console over the other for whatever reason, whether it be brand loyalty, technical specs, features / whatever - the most important thing people care about is which console the other people in their friends network are going to buy. If all your friends bought a Playstation 4, and you were the only one who bought an Xbox One... well, all your friends will having fun playing online together on the Playstation gaming network, and you'll be playing with random people on your Xbox, wishing you had purchased a Playstation 4 too. I don't think Digital Currency is any different; the ability to grow fast will ultimately come down to the size and quality of the community; the larger it gets, the more people will randomly tell their friends 'I paid 10 DNotes for it' (free marketing), the more people will accept and use it as a medium to transfer value, and finally, the more people will want to be involved. This is the best way to allow allocative efficiency given limited resources. Developing and marketing a Digital Currency will cost a fortune, especially if you plan to challenge global payment processors. A strong community means the development team can focus on 'technical' aspects of the currency later once the community is self-perpetuating continued growth. This approach is less risky than exerting much effort and finances for technical work before you have an active community and stakeholders (what if nobody uses your coin?).
XC, DRK, Monero and many others created 'anonymous send' capability around the same time, they also achieved it using slightly different methods. Given that fact, technical superiority doesn't guarantee success when rivals are committing resources to achieve the same end. Short term price pumps by short-term traders that knew technology equated to higher prices did most of the marketing on their behalf. That is why after the traders dumped, XC, DRK and XMR are not worth anywhere near what they were today. Technical coins get replaced by newer and better technical coins all the time. There is no use holding onto 'tech' currencies long term, I've yet to see one's price sustain after the initial trading hype. I personally don't see much in the way of reason that a technically advanced currency can attract much more than any other currency than the impatient computer literate members you described, and the speculative traders who follow them. Everyday crypto users will be quite content with a basic blockchain that is updated in line with the latest *useful* innovations.
I think, that DNotes community is the strongest asset it has. Everybody here selflessly contributes, offers and lets one another know the great things they are doing to help DNotes programs, I mean RJF had his daughter put posters up around the university she works to help the CRISP for Students program! Cryptobroker put up 30 flyers at his local uni, and privately messaged me about it (here is your public thanks). These are but a few contributions I've seen recently.
At this point I'll ask that under the presumption that community growth is of paramount importance -
What do people here think the best way to encourage forum participation is? What types of people would be interested in crypto and the problems that DNotes is providing solutions to?