Yes only 11 months left, we are still working through how to merge the masternode start times. We either start the masternodes 1 month (depending when) behind. Or we add the 100k Orangcoins, the masternodes would have made in the first month to the final amount of coins.
Another thing, this clearly re-arranges the economics of the coin, no matter what scenario. Here are the scenarios.
A: take the MN payouts from the original specs which hurts every investors PoS returns.
B: shorten the time period of PoS minting to, say, 40 years, which the 6 years of minting would be released faster into circulation but everyone still gets what the original specs stated for investors. The actual coins/time period would reflect the MN payout schedule of 2% so it might not even be 6 years, it would be less. 2% of 200 million is 4 million coins, and it isn't enough.
C: add the MN payouts to the total coin cap, for total cap 204 million coins. Still isn't enough... increase cap to 220 million over 46 years and devote the 20 million to the MN
B and C are less detrimental to the investors, and the model might be why price is suffering. 2000 OC is not very much per node and the price would have to rise substantially for the interest earned plus profits to make $5 per month to cover fees. People were buying large amounts to cover the requirements, and now that requirements are so low, ppl are selling large amounts.
Since this affects all OC holders, it should be decided in a vote, not centralized around the 2 devs working on this. The whole point of MN is decentralizing the nodes and anon comes from that. Not trying to start trouble, but I'm here for the community as well.
Also, my numbers are just thrown out there as examples, not based on any calculations.
Afterthought: cutting the 2.5% pos after year 5 down to 1-1.5% has reduced income earned for stakers by 50%. It's 4% for 2% on 20%.