Yes sir ,we work based on user demanss
Here I go,
First thing I still don't understand is how you state you have 97% satisfactory, not only from how you collected the data itself, but also on the validity of the data. Simply speaking, if those 97% are satisfied, then shouldn't this new token situation not necessary? they're satisfied, afterall. While we're at it, please explain how you get this number too, did you contacted each of your buyers? How? Aren't they just an address without any name and contact details? If you can reach them to ask about feedback just from their participation on your ICO, wouldn't it be worrysome because their privacy and anonymity breached?
Second, you are completely aware that if the real issue here is ETH high fee and your community demanded you to switch chain, you can simply switch without having to another token sale, right? Plenty of tokens are switching from ERC to BSC, and all they need were swapping the token or doing a gateway, I never see a project that take another token sale just because they need to switch. Care to explain the reason behind this?
Third, your self-acclaimed achievement of good reviews, I can't help but wonder if these reviews are valid or are they made by relatives, friends, and/or paid service, a bounty you had, perhaps? Given how shallow and generic their reviews are, it seems like those people had not even tried your platform. One thing that is interesting to mention is how one from the seven of those reviewers --of we talk statistic, that's about 15%-- shared the same surname as yours. Does Chinyere Popoola related to you?
Second of all yes is related to me but not only she but people that Message me.
Third of all how can you say we will run another token pre sale on High gas fee do you even take time to reason the reviews from our investor's because they are Private.
Four : we don't have their physical address and even if we have we wouldn't share it with you or anyone you can just come and say okay sir give me his address and phone number no way man.
Five : WE ARE NOT BREACHING PRIVACY.This just looks like you are intentionally making this up .
Do you even read properly what I said earlier ?