Announcing BPIP - The Bitcointalk Public Information Project! - page 17.

mu_enrico

copper member

Activity: 2324

Merit: 2142

Slots Enthusiast & Expert

@Alizaind, I think your 2nd bug (i.e., giving merit to yourself) was because of this bug:

Quote from: mu_enrico on August 28, 2018, 11:55:39 PM

This issue occurs when I quote a merited post below my post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.44757543 and the merits on that post are counted into my merit balance. https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=mu_enrico

In your case, you edited your opener post, quoted Husna QA, and then gave merit to the quoted (Husna QA) post.

Edit: why always Husna QA Grin

Alizaind

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 119

Ya Fattah Ya Razzaq

Can Anyone Explain this? Huh

https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=Alizaind

- I accidentaly sent my smerit to my post 1 time.
- I cant find my post that received merit from hilariousetc

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Alizaind

- What is different between Merit Received and Current Merit?

EDIT :

Thanks @mu_enrico and @Suchmoon for clear explanation.

Quote from: mu_enrico on October 24, 2018, 10:09:40 PM

---
Edit: why always Husna QA Grin

I like Husna QA reviews for my posts & suggestions for me. Cheesy

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Quote from: suchmoon on October 11, 2018, 07:59:44 AM

Quote from: Initscri on October 10, 2018, 10:59:39 PM

Sorry for the double post. Just didn't want this to get lost by editing previous.

Is there any way we can search/query for users based on specific criteria (activity, merit, post count).
It'd be awesome to start cracking down on users selling accounts, because they usually give this information out freely.

For example: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hero-member-copper-member-5047609

Likely a scam. I can't find anybody close to those numbers. A Hero with 800+ merits would have earned 300+ and there aren't that many users who have done that:

https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerited

You can easily check all 2015 registrations. The only Coppers are Lutpin and LeGaulois who don't match other criteria.

A real account seller likely wouldn't be giving you identifying details but a scammer likely would be giving you fake details or real details of an account that has nothing to do with it.

Good point. I guess only a small minority of users who actually report real numbers. Not exactly the most "trustable" group to say the least.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Initscri on October 10, 2018, 10:59:39 PM

Sorry for the double post. Just didn't want this to get lost by editing previous.

Is there any way we can search/query for users based on specific criteria (activity, merit, post count).
It'd be awesome to start cracking down on users selling accounts, because they usually give this information out freely.

For example: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hero-member-copper-member-5047609

Likely a scam. I can't find anybody close to those numbers. A Hero with 800+ merits would have earned 300+ and there aren't that many users who have done that:

https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerited

You can easily check all 2015 registrations. The only Coppers are Lutpin and LeGaulois who don't match other criteria.

A real account seller likely wouldn't be giving you identifying details but a scammer likely would be giving you fake details or real details of an account that has nothing to do with it.

Piggy

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1416

Quote from: Initscri on October 10, 2018, 10:59:39 PM

For example: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hero-member-copper-member-5047609

i tried to track down the account based on those kind of information once, but then realized there is no certainty about being correct either, they could be leading to a complete legit account. The only way to be sure they are selling a specific account is when they are handing it over. Undecided

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Sorry for the double post. Just didn't want this to get lost by editing previous.

Is there any way we can search/query for users based on specific criteria (activity, merit, post count).
It'd be awesome to start cracking down on users selling accounts, because they usually give this information out freely.

For example: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hero-member-copper-member-5047609

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Quote from: TheBeardedBaby on October 03, 2018, 02:24:45 PM

Quote from: TheBeardedBaby on October 02, 2018, 07:12:34 AM

~snip~
After trying with @ ! - ^ $ * ( ) _ are OK
# returns no result
% _ return the ! result

I already mentioned it here, there are other symbols that return weird results.

The worst is "?"

Ah ok, didn't notice you posted that before.
What should be noted is that # seems to have a different action than the rest though, considering it actually redirects the user back to homepage.

This is due to browsers parsing # as a fragment identifier, which turns the query into the equivalent of an empty search string (https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=)

What should fix everything, is just URL encoding the search string.
For example: https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=%23 works fine to show #

I'll have to make modifications to my extension to do the same.

TheBeardedBaby

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 3150

₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(

Quote from: TheBeardedBaby on October 02, 2018, 07:12:34 AM

~snip~
After trying with @ ! - ^ $ * ( ) _ are OK
# returns no result
% _ return the ! result

I already mentioned it here, there are other symbols that return weird results.

The worst is "?"

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Quote from: LoyceV on October 03, 2018, 02:15:38 PM

Quote from: Initscri on October 03, 2018, 02:07:03 PM

Not sure if usernames as permitted to start with # on BitcoinTalk, but if they are, that may cause an issue.

Search on Bitcointalk shows many usernames with a #.

Yeah, so that's a bug then. Trying to put one of their usernames into BPIP won't work. You just get redirected to the homepage.

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=#

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Initscri on October 03, 2018, 02:07:03 PM

Not sure if usernames as permitted to start with # on BitcoinTalk, but if they are, that may cause an issue.

Search on Bitcointalk shows many usernames with a #.

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Also noticed that searching '#' just returns back to the homepage. Not sure if usernames as permitted to start with # on BitcoinTalk, but if they are, that may cause an issue.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: kirreev070 on October 03, 2018, 08:59:37 AM

I found a bug on your site. When you open any profile and then open another profile, when you try to update the profile information you are transferred to another profile. I recorded a video on which you can see this bug.

Video: https://youtu.be/aXM7zA1oyz4

When you load a profile it saves a browser cookie with that profile number. That is the profile that loads after checkitnow runs.

In your video, take note of the last profile you loaded.

TryNinja

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 6830

Quote from: kirreev070 on October 03, 2018, 08:59:37 AM

I found a bug on your site. When you open any profile and then open another profile, when you try to update the profile information you are transferred to another profile. I recorded a video on which you can see this bug.

Video: https://youtu.be/aXM7zA1oyz4

It's not really a bug - it's just how it works. When you click on "UPDATE PROFILE", you go to a page called checkitnow.aspx which (probably) requests an update to the last profile you visited (which is known due to cookies on your browser) and redirects you back to it.

kirreev070

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 293

I found a bug on your site. When you open any profile and then open another profile, when you try to update the profile information you are transferred to another profile. I recorded a video on which you can see this bug.

Video: https://youtu.be/aXM7zA1oyz4

TheBeardedBaby

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 3150

₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(

Another idea is to have a link to this thread somewhere in About, so everyone can easily come here and report bugs or just leave a comment.

Instely

jr. member

Activity: 56

Merit: 9

This may become a sort of bitcointalk forum wayback machine, as this forum have a long history and has been pretty much since bitcoin started.
I Can imagine if bitcoin/crypto finally disrupts into the mainstream culture this may be useful for someone who wants to investigate which has been the roots of this technology and the community that has been with it from the start!

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Quote from: ibminer on October 01, 2018, 09:58:45 AM

Quote from: Initscri on October 01, 2018, 01:05:38 AM

This was only an issue in Chrome. Firefox seemed to be working fine.

Hmm, interesting... there shouldn't be anything hiding that element even with having it at -1, what version of Chrome are you on?

For me the current z-index ordering is working fine on Chrome 69.0.3497 (latest) & also tested on 66.0.3359 (just because I had this version on another machine near me Wink

). Your changes seem to push the elements up 2 levels, which shouldn't really hurt anything to make these changes, but I'm just curious why it's happening and whether it's browser-based or I'm overlooking an issue with the ordering. Most other elements I've had to modify the z-index on are above 3 or well below -2, and the rest would be interpreted based on inheritances.

Quote from: Initscri on September 28, 2018, 01:32:27 PM

BTW, if you need any help w/ something modular (something you can split off and re-implement w/o too much difficulty), feel free to shoot anything my way.

Thank you, I'll certainly keep this in mind!

Yea, definitely is weird to me. Using the latest version: 69.0.3497.100.

No console/network errors either. I'll try it in BrowserStack when I get the chance.

TheBeardedBaby

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 3150

₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(

Just played a little but with BPIP today and I found that if you search for special characters it returns all the usernames (I guess) stated with a special character. There is a list below.
Lets try searching for a ★ for example here is the result >

After trying with @ ! - ^ $ * ( ) _ are OK
# returns no result
% _ return the ! result

Edited: fixed some typos

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: Initscri on October 01, 2018, 01:05:38 AM

This was only an issue in Chrome. Firefox seemed to be working fine.

Hmm, interesting... there shouldn't be anything hiding that element even with having it at -1, what version of Chrome are you on?

For me the current z-index ordering is working fine on Chrome 69.0.3497 (latest) & also tested on 66.0.3359 (just because I had this version on another machine near me Wink

). Your changes seem to push the elements up 2 levels, which shouldn't really hurt anything to make these changes, but I'm just curious why it's happening and whether it's browser-based or I'm overlooking an issue with the ordering. Most other elements I've had to modify the z-index on are above 3 or well below -2, and the rest would be interpreted based on inheritances.

Quote from: Initscri on September 28, 2018, 01:32:27 PM

BTW, if you need any help w/ something modular (something you can split off and re-implement w/o too much difficulty), feel free to shoot anything my way.

Thank you, I'll certainly keep this in mind!

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Quote from: ibminer on September 28, 2018, 01:26:35 PM

EDIT: Site has been adjusted to use a pseudo element for the fixed background effect.

Looks good, seems to be showing the following on my end. BG is missing.
https://i.imgur.com/gf9k0Yo.png

Changing the following z-index levels seemed to make it work again for me

Change main::before from z-index: -1 to 1.
Change .mainarea to z-index: 2
Change footer to z-index: 2

Code:

main::before {
z-index: 1
}

.mainarea, footer {
z-index: 2;
}

Which resulted in: https://i.imgur.com/pwVFFss.jpg

This was only an issue in Chrome. Firefox seemed to be working fine.

Topic: Announcing BPIP - The Bitcointalk Public Information Project! - page 17. (Read 33715 times)