Topic: [ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here] - page 62. (Read 164913 times)
we should see over 10k soon 50k will come fast don't blink
Hi!
What makes this coin different from Pascal?
What makes this coin different from Pascal?
cleaner code, 3000 lines changed, still more to be done, account trading marketplace, we've just begun.
both are good we won't comment on which is better but we have currently released alot more. just see current supply versus pascal and compare marketcap. so to a investor it is very attractive.
team is working hard pasc and pasl will flourish together
Hi!
What makes this coin different from Pascal?
What makes this coin different from Pascal?
we just jumped a few levels only 1.74btc under 10k then straight 20-30-40k
Hi.
Send from my suprnova account some pasl to cryptopia but nothing come to the exchange.
On BlockEplorer transaction is ok, example:
00000000E33E01002C0000003942343445373930314341314246433130333042
others with the same problem?
Send from my suprnova account some pasl to cryptopia but nothing come to the exchange.
On BlockEplorer transaction is ok, example:
00000000E33E01002C0000003942343445373930314341314246433130333042
others with the same problem?
Suprnova found 31 block last day with ~60 GH/s avg speed. So, your estimated earnings should be something about 12.658268 PASL in ideal conditions (i mean that speed estimation is correct and we are measuring day length accurate enough).
What is about pool switching. please don't switch to fairpool permanently, since we have non proportional hashrate now.
It will be the best if you will distribute your hashrate to suprnova after tests.
What is about pool switching. please don't switch to fairpool permanently, since we have non proportional hashrate now.
It will be the best if you will distribute your hashrate to suprnova after tests.
Why `12.658268 PASL` ? I should be getting the same amount of coins from each pool, given my hashrate is the same on both.
I have switched a second rig to pasl.
Now mining with 540Mhash on suprnova and 490Mhash on fairpool.
Its very hard to estimate suprnova's average hashrate for the last 24 hours. All I have is a graph like this
So lets say average hashrate is ~250GHS, and they had ~60GHS. So they should of found ~70 blocks but only found ~30 according to the block stats. Could be very bad luck day.
Post your results after 24hours from mining on both pools and we will see what we get.
EDIT: I noticed that the hashrate went up exponentially on fairpool and suprnova just now. I think people are "pool hopping" basically. Rent hashrate when difficulty is low and stop mining when difficulty is driven up.
Suprnova found 31 block last day with ~60 GH/s avg speed. So, your estimated earnings should be something about 12.658268 PASL in ideal conditions (i mean that speed estimation is correct and we are measuring day length accurate enough).
What is about pool switching. please don't switch to fairpool permanently, since we have non proportional hashrate now.
It will be the best if you will distribute your hashrate to suprnova after tests.
What is about pool switching. please don't switch to fairpool permanently, since we have non proportional hashrate now.
It will be the best if you will distribute your hashrate to suprnova after tests.
Why `12.658268 PASL` ? I should be getting the same amount of coins from each pool, given my hashrate is the same on both.
I have switched a second rig to pasl.
Now mining with 540Mhash on suprnova and 490Mhash on fairpool.
EDIT:
I checked pool stats. Example:
Someone with 333 MH/s earned 21.4007 PASL last day.
I checked pool stats. Example:
Someone with 333 MH/s earned 21.4007 PASL last day.
This is coming from fairpool? Let me switch over and compare in next 24h
Suprnova found 31 block last day with ~60 GH/s avg speed. So, your estimated earnings should be something about 12.658268 PASL in ideal conditions (i mean that speed estimation is correct and we are measuring day length accurate enough).
What is about pool switching. please don't switch to fairpool permanently, since we have non proportional hashrate now.
It will be the best if you will distribute your hashrate to suprnova after tests.
EDIT:
I checked pool stats. Example:
Someone with 333 MH/s earned 21.4007 PASL last day.
I checked pool stats. Example:
Someone with 333 MH/s earned 21.4007 PASL last day.
This is coming from fairpool? Let me switch over and compare in next 24h
Hm, i had checked all things.
Reply from API:
{"blocks": 17248, "supply": 862400.0, "difficulty": 7499.536796971916, "accounts": 86240, "lastreward": 50.0, "hashrate": 199118504000}
So, difficulty is calculated in Bitcoin terms (2 ^ 32 multiplier). What multiplier do you using on the your side for our algo?
If you will calculate Hashrate using multiplier 2^32, then for diff 7499.536796971916 it will be 107 GH/s for last block.
"hashrate" field exposed by API is an average hashrate of 50 last blocks.
Yep, you should earn about 43.2 PASL per day with 500 MH/s (250.7 sec avg for last 200 blocks right now).
Reply from API:
{"blocks": 17248, "supply": 862400.0, "difficulty": 7499.536796971916, "accounts": 86240, "lastreward": 50.0, "hashrate": 199118504000}
So, difficulty is calculated in Bitcoin terms (2 ^ 32 multiplier). What multiplier do you using on the your side for our algo?
If you will calculate Hashrate using multiplier 2^32, then for diff 7499.536796971916 it will be 107 GH/s for last block.
"hashrate" field exposed by API is an average hashrate of 50 last blocks.
Yep, you should earn about 43.2 PASL per day with 500 MH/s (250.7 sec avg for last 200 blocks right now).
Currently using `2^32` for both reward and nethash calculation.
Hmm so our calculations match (wtm shows about 107 GH/s nethash right now), but somehow I mined on suprnova 4 times less than estimated.
The pools luck was negative, but only 108%. No idea whats causing this.
Could someone else post their 24h earnings, please?
Absolutely correct. Sorry for that, when i copied difficulty calculation algo from my pool to blockchain API i forgot to correct it. Give me some minutes i will fix that.
The root of the problem is that mining software (sgminer, for example) still using 2^32 multiplier even for Pascal algo and i was forced to use that on the pool's side to be able to support that software.
The root of the problem is that mining software (sgminer, for example) still using 2^32 multiplier even for Pascal algo and i was forced to use that on the pool's side to be able to support that software.
Hey there, thanks for responding. Just wanted to make sure about nethash, as edited on my first post:
`Edit2: Are we 100% sure that nethash isnt in fact 4 times bigger than given by api?`
By doing simple nethash equation:
`coins_per_day = 50 * (24 * 60 / 4) = 18000` - 4 minutes is the current average block_time over last 24h
`coins_per_day * 500Mh / 200_000 Mh = 45` - shouldnt the nethash reported be 4 times bigger as well?
Hm, i had checked all things.
Reply from API:
{"blocks": 17248, "supply": 862400.0, "difficulty": 7499.536796971916, "accounts": 86240, "lastreward": 50.0, "hashrate": 199118504000}
So, difficulty is calculated in Bitcoin terms (2 ^ 32 multiplier). What multiplier do you using on the your side for our algo?
If you will calculate Hashrate using multiplier 2^32, then for diff 7499.536796971916 it will be 107 GH/s for last block.
"hashrate" field exposed by API is an average hashrate of 50 last blocks.
Yep, you should earn about 43.2 PASL per day with 500 MH/s (250.7 sec avg for last 200 blocks right now).
EDIT:
I checked pool stats. Example:
Someone with 333 MH/s earned 21.4007 PASL last day.
EDIT2:
Another one guy with ~700-800 MH/s earned 45.4749 PASL last day.
Absolutely correct. Sorry for that, when i copied difficulty calculation algo from my pool to blockchain API i forgot to correct it. Give me some minutes i will fix that.
The root of the problem is that mining software (sgminer, for example) still using 2^32 multiplier even for Pascal algo and i was forced to use that on the pool's side to be able to support that software.
The root of the problem is that mining software (sgminer, for example) still using 2^32 multiplier even for Pascal algo and i was forced to use that on the pool's side to be able to support that software.
Hey there, thanks for responding. Just wanted to make sure about nethash, as edited on my first post:
`Edit2: Are we 100% sure that nethash isnt in fact 4 times bigger than given by api?`
By doing simple nethash equation:
`coins_per_day = 50 * (24 * 60 / 4) = 18000` - 4 minutes is the current average block_time over last 24h
`coins_per_day * 500Mh / 200_000 Mh = 45` - shouldnt the nethash reported be 4 times bigger as well?
Ok. I've sent them our API over.
I basically used the form at http://whattomine.com/contacts/new
Hopefully that will get a hold of them.
Would be nice to see "ETH+PASL" profitability
I basically used the form at http://whattomine.com/contacts/new
Hopefully that will get a hold of them.
Would be nice to see "ETH+PASL" profitability
Hey I am seeing wrong results from calculation for the difficulty exposed by the api.
I see that you use a `2^32` multiplier internally, but maybe it should be `2^34` instead?
I base this on the fact that my estimated rewards are around 4 times bigger than in reality.
Calculated for 500Mhash returns 42.3, but in reality I have mined 9.5 on suprnova.
I have taken the default (bitcoin and many algos use this) `2^32` multiplier, cause is fits nethash to diff formula.
`nethash = difficulty * 2^32 / block_time`
Waiting for a response
Edit: Can anyone post their earnings for past 24h with given hashrate? Thanks.
Absolutely correct. Sorry for that, when i copied difficulty calculation algo from my pool to blockchain API i forgot to correct it. Give me some minutes i will fix that.
The root of the problem is that mining software (sgminer, for example) still using 2^32 multiplier even for Pascal algo and i was forced to use that on the pool's side to be able to support that software.
Ok. I've sent them our API over.
I basically used the form at http://whattomine.com/contacts/new
Hopefully that will get a hold of them.
Would be nice to see "ETH+PASL" profitability
I basically used the form at http://whattomine.com/contacts/new
Hopefully that will get a hold of them.
Would be nice to see "ETH+PASL" profitability
Hey I am seeing wrong results from calculation for the difficulty exposed by the api.
I see that you use a `2^32` multiplier internally, but maybe it should be `2^34` instead?
I base this on the fact that my estimated rewards are around 4 times bigger than in reality.
Calculated for 500Mhash returns 42.3, but in reality I have mined 9.5 on suprnova.
I have taken the default (bitcoin and many algos use this) `2^32` multiplier, cause is fits nethash to diff formula.
`nethash = difficulty * 2^32 / block_time`
Waiting for a response
Edit: Can anyone post their earnings for past 24h with given hashrate? Thanks.
Edit2: Are we 100% sure that nethash isnt in fact 4 times bigger than given by api?
looking to buy 100,000 PASL. we'l agree on price and complete on trade on cryptopia
Best way to deal with this would be to use escrow. Especially if you want to go outside of the market price since there might be iceberg orders on Crytopia.
100,000 PASL is a huge amount considering there is only ~850,000 supply in total.
Price i'l pay is 4000 sats minimum quantity 20,000. too long to buy on exchange no one will dump. just put up the order i'l buy it
There´s 11000 at 4800 right now. buy buy
looking to buy 100,000 PASL. we'l agree on price and complete on trade on cryptopia
Best way to deal with this would be to use escrow. Especially if you want to go outside of the market price since there might be iceberg orders on Crytopia.
100,000 PASL is a huge amount considering there is only ~850,000 supply in total.
Price i'l pay is 4000 sats minimum quantity 20,000. too long to buy on exchange no one will dump. just put up the order i'l buy it
I wasn't selling. But stating for both parties to use escrow and go outside of the market instead.
looking to buy 100,000 PASL. we'l agree on price and complete on trade on cryptopia
Best way to deal with this would be to use escrow. Especially if you want to go outside of the market price since there might be iceberg orders on Crytopia.
100,000 PASL is a huge amount considering there is only ~850,000 supply in total.
Price i'l pay is 4000 sats minimum quantity 20,000. too long to buy on exchange no one will dump. just put up the order i'l buy it
add 1 more zero to your price we have a deal. don't have 20,000 though
looking to buy 100,000 PASL. we'l agree on price and complete on trade on cryptopia
Best way to deal with this would be to use escrow. Especially if you want to go outside of the market price since there might be iceberg orders on Crytopia.
100,000 PASL is a huge amount considering there is only ~850,000 supply in total.
Price i'l pay is 4000 sats minimum quantity 20,000. too long to buy on exchange no one will dump. just put up the order i'l buy it
looking to buy 100,000 PASL. we'l agree on price and complete on trade on cryptopia
I only have 8500 and 39 accounts...
Small supply...
looking to buy 100,000 PASL. we'l agree on price and complete on trade on cryptopia
Best way to deal with this would be to use escrow. Especially if you want to go outside of the market price since there might be iceberg orders on Crytopia.
100,000 PASL is a huge amount considering there is only ~850,000 supply in total.
Jump to: