[ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here] - page 66.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 20, 2017, 03:27:38 AM

@Ocminer, Please exercise timestamp honesty. If you have grudge with the original pascal please do not bring it here.

Your block 16472 with timestamp:1489997320 = Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:08:40 GMT but look at my logfile with payload removed, your blocks came with 2 minutes 20 seconds late. Please fix your time and do not do whatever is that you are doing in pascal lite.

Code:

20/03/2017 08:10:46.516 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:46.516 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997444 nonce:638370917
20/03/2017 08:10:58.646 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:58.647 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997455 nonce:3071193822
20/03/2017 08:10:59.586 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:59.586 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997454 nonce:2724550670
20/03/2017 08:11:00.805 TID:00000A90 [Update] New block height:16472 nOnce:2028982788 timestamp:1489997320 Operations:0 Fee:0 SafeBoxBalance:8236500000=8236500000 PoW:00000000000004AD156B527EFC0D33B1481119AA5DEB757540AF1D9B42FB82D1 Operations previous Safe Box hash:912B0CED40D4BB5C92D33B79D2A1051185B603460D0AF57EC1CD748995BD2A3C Future old Safe Box hash for next block:BE19AC69E08A69E2EC361589234F4DA0B2821565338E88CA3DBE08B92BB45639
20/03/2017 08:11:00.807 TID:00000668 [Error] Invalid new block 16472: block (16472) is not new position (16473)
20/03/2017 08:11:00.807 TID:00000D6C [Error] Invalid new block 16472: block (16472) is not new position (16473)
20/03/2017 08:11:01.155 TID:00000668 [Info] My blockchain is ok! Need to download new blocks starting at 16473
20/03/2017 08:11:08.715 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16473: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:11:08.715 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997465 nonce:2921113476
20/03/2017 08:11:26.850 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16473: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:11:26.850 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997484 nonce:1180994566

Timestamp on the server is okay, it's synchronized via NTP every 24h - so that can't be the problem.

I'm simply hashing and sending what comes from the miner, i'll check if maybe some miner sends an invalid timestamp but I should already be checking for that in my stratum server - so i'm unsure what the problem could be here.

ulfsaar

full member

Activity: 197

Merit: 100

@Ocminer, Please exercise timestamp honesty. If you have grudge with the original pascal please do not bring it here.

Your block 16472 with timestamp:1489997320 = Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:08:40 GMT but look at my logfile with payload removed, your blocks came with 2 minutes 20 seconds timestamp late. Please fix your time and do not do whatever is that you are doing in pascal lite.

Code:

20/03/2017 08:10:46.516 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:46.516 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997444 nonce:638370917
20/03/2017 08:10:58.646 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:58.647 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997455 nonce:3071193822
20/03/2017 08:10:59.586 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16472: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:10:59.586 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997454 nonce:2724550670
20/03/2017 08:11:00.805 TID:00000A90 [Update] New block height:16472 nOnce:2028982788 timestamp:1489997320 Operations:0 Fee:0 SafeBoxBalance:8236500000=8236500000 PoW:00000000000004AD156B527EFC0D33B1481119AA5DEB757540AF1D9B42FB82D1 Operations previous Safe Box hash:912B0CED40D4BB5C92D33B79D2A1051185B603460D0AF57EC1CD748995BD2A3C Future old Safe Box hash for next block:BE19AC69E08A69E2EC361589234F4DA0B2821565338E88CA3DBE08B92BB45639
20/03/2017 08:11:00.807 TID:00000668 [Error] Invalid new block 16472: block (16472) is not new position (16473)
20/03/2017 08:11:00.807 TID:00000D6C [Error] Invalid new block 16472: block (16472) is not new position (16473)
20/03/2017 08:11:01.155 TID:00000668 [Info] My blockchain is ok! Need to download new blocks starting at 16473
20/03/2017 08:11:08.715 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16473: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:11:08.715 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997465 nonce:2921113476
20/03/2017 08:11:26.850 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Invalid new block 16473: Proof of work is higher than target
20/03/2017 08:11:26.850 TID:00000CB4 [Error] Sending Error JSON RPC id () : Error: Proof of work is higher than target payload: timestamp:1489997484 nonce:1180994566

And another one, block 16475 with timestamp:1489998447 = Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:27:27 GMT, this one is worse almost 5 minutes. If you are just going to harm this chain, please go away.

Code:

20/03/2017 08:32:29.856 TID:00000668 [Update] New block height:16475 nOnce:1424286464 timestamp:1489998447 Operations:18 Fee:2500 SafeBoxBalance:8238000000=8238000000 PoW:00000000000004869075B9BC3320BE490C9E37F443DABEF9696C1D488660D3EA Operations previous Safe Box hash:01FFC74EC4BBC19044D6D56BAAA955EFE26EB6439A2E338AA7BA30E627D76B3D Future old Safe Box hash for next block:D1676BA1F765AF088F904AEAC7290BF26EC8CA4269D00F8E97E6043491D40D87
20/03/2017 08:32:29.872 TID:000015D4 [Error] Invalid new block 16475: Error executing operation 1/18: Invalid n_operation 5 (expected 6)
20/03/2017 08:32:30.355 TID:000015D4 [Info] My blockchain is ok! Need to download new blocks starting at 16476

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: btw50 on March 20, 2017, 12:29:33 AM

Suprnova's PaslCoin Pool // Algo: sha256t //

so what algo pascal or sha256t for pascal-lite ?

i could rent pascal algo from nicehash and point it to supernova ?

Its a typo. Its Pascal algo and yes you can rent hash from Nicehash.

btw50

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Suprnova's PaslCoin Pool // Algo: sha256t //

so what algo pascal or sha256t for pascal-lite ?

i could rent pascal algo from nicehash and point it to supernova ?

max2000irc

hero member

Activity: 528

Merit: 501

Quote from: adaseb on March 20, 2017, 12:19:46 AM

Quote from: max2000irc on March 20, 2017, 12:09:50 AM

Connections 0 , alone in the world after a while , why is this?

Anyone having troubles accessing pasl.faripool.xyz? ( This site can’t be reached )

Thanks

Yes it seems the pools front end is down. But it still accepting shares.

However according to Suprnova

Suprnova's PaslCoin Pool // Algo: sha256t // LIVE !

Seems you can use their pool to separate the hashrate

https://pasl.suprnova.cc/

According to the Connections, it seems there are over a dozen nodes or so online. Each wallet should have 8 Connections.

The clock on my laptop have problems and I think I ended being blacklisted , now changed the ip ( lucky I have a dinamic IP) and is connected

Thanks

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: max2000irc on March 20, 2017, 12:09:50 AM

Connections 0 , alone in the world after a while , why is this?

Anyone having troubles accessing pasl.faripool.xyz? ( This site can’t be reached )

Thanks

Yes it seems the pools front end is down. But it still accepting shares.

However according to Suprnova

Suprnova's PaslCoin Pool // Algo: sha256t // LIVE !

Seems you can use their pool to separate the hashrate

https://pasl.suprnova.cc/

According to the Connections, it seems there are over a dozen nodes or so online. Each wallet should have 8 Connections.

btw50

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Quote from: max2000irc on March 20, 2017, 12:09:50 AM

Connections 0 , alone in the world after a while , why is this?

Anyone having troubles accessing pasl.faripool.xyz? ( This site can’t be reached )

Thanks

yes, the site went down long time ago must be an hour

max2000irc

hero member

Activity: 528

Merit: 501

Connections 0 , alone in the world after a while , why is this?

Anyone having troubles accessing pasl.faripool.xyz? ( This site can’t be reached )

Thanks

Aetsen

full member

Activity: 188

Merit: 100

The long delay in that block was from someone renting hash on nicehash. Network hashrate went to over 400 MHs for a while and it caused the difficulty to increase a lot. Then when their rented time ran out the network went back to regular miners. It should stabilize now over time.

ulfsaar

full member

Activity: 197

Merit: 100

Quote from: lockepi on March 19, 2017, 07:42:46 PM

Quote from: joaogti36 on March 19, 2017, 07:39:41 PM

Quote from: lockepi on March 19, 2017, 07:38:13 PM

Quote from: joaogti36 on March 19, 2017, 07:37:04 PM

network crashed???'

What makes you say that?

no blockchain...lasst block has long time ago and counting

You sure mine showing 1minute ago

is 1 minute too long lol

Hes right there was no block for more than 1 hour. but its ok. Suprnova was with 300ghs+ then suddenly drop to 25ghs, and the networks thinks it still has 500ghs+ on it with diff target of 2F23F177. It took 1 hour for fairpool to find the next block.

lockepi

sr. member

Activity: 469

Merit: 250

Quote from: joaogti36 on March 19, 2017, 07:39:41 PM

Quote from: lockepi on March 19, 2017, 07:38:13 PM

Quote from: joaogti36 on March 19, 2017, 07:37:04 PM

network crashed???'

What makes you say that?

no blockchain...lasst block has long time ago and counting

You sure mine showing 1minute ago

is 1 minute too long lol

MrJaekin

sr. member

Activity: 275

Merit: 258

Block was 1 min ago... 16459 now

joaogti36

full member

Activity: 162

Merit: 100

Quote from: lockepi on March 19, 2017, 07:38:13 PM

Quote from: joaogti36 on March 19, 2017, 07:37:04 PM

network crashed???'

What makes you say that?

no blockchain...lasst block has long time ago and counting

lockepi

sr. member

Activity: 469

Merit: 250

Quote from: joaogti36 on March 19, 2017, 07:37:04 PM

network crashed???'

What makes you say that?

joaogti36

full member

Activity: 162

Merit: 100

network crashed???'

ulfsaar

full member

Activity: 197

Merit: 100

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 04:41:13 PM

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 19, 2017, 04:37:35 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 01:52:22 PM

Quote from: DeCrypterManiac on March 19, 2017, 01:47:55 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 01:17:59 PM

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 19, 2017, 12:31:34 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 12:16:29 PM

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 19, 2017, 12:11:08 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 11:40:11 AM

Nope, no pool from me guys, it's just a testpool, please don't put any hash on it !

So far how do you find pascal lite?

IMHO Pascal Lite is much better (now) than the original PascalCoin since it has active dev(s) and most important: the devs actually know what they're doing

Also the Account Trading Platform is nice.

However due to the bad codebase of the original coin during launch this coin got raped instantly and the instamine was enormous, unfortunately this isn't fixable.

When dev xiphon fixed the code, we are only at block 7k, around 300k coins. At launch ofcourse, since codebase is similar to original pascal, the weakness was taken advantage of. There were only a few bad actors(me included) and the amount they got is very small compared to the total amount now and would be lesser and lesser as the coin grew. We can only say thank you to them for highlighting those bugs that need fixing. I only point 3 gpu on this and most complaint came from guys like me who put few gpus. I dont think it is that bad.

Edit: what's the hashrate on your testpool? You keep finding blocks. Grin

Pool works fine, I don't see any orphans or reorganization yet like in the other chain.. Seems stable. I'll test for another 24h and then we'll see.

Thanks for the pool, will you be sending out accounts for free like in pasc ?

Yes, of course. Give me 24h to test network stability, I don't want to run into the same problems here like with the other fork.

Suprnova drift 2 mins.

Code:

20/03/2017 21:20:16.009 TID:000004D4 [Update] New block height:16433 nOnce:-598997493 timestamp:1489958296 Operations:0 Fee:0 SafeBoxBalance:8217000000=8217000000

Timestamp

Code:

1489958296 = Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:18:16 GMT

2mins difference but as long as not holding that's fine.

Hmm, no drift on my side:

19 Mar 22:40:43 ntpdate[19722]: adjust time server 192.53.103.108 offset -0.003074 sec

I will check again, maybe my time is off. sorry

Is that hash on pool all yours? or from nicehash?

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 19, 2017, 04:37:35 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 01:52:22 PM

Quote from: DeCrypterManiac on March 19, 2017, 01:47:55 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 01:17:59 PM

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 19, 2017, 12:31:34 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 12:16:29 PM

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 19, 2017, 12:11:08 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 11:40:11 AM

Nope, no pool from me guys, it's just a testpool, please don't put any hash on it !

So far how do you find pascal lite?

IMHO Pascal Lite is much better (now) than the original PascalCoin since it has active dev(s) and most important: the devs actually know what they're doing

Also the Account Trading Platform is nice.

However due to the bad codebase of the original coin during launch this coin got raped instantly and the instamine was enormous, unfortunately this isn't fixable.

When dev xiphon fixed the code, we are only at block 7k, around 300k coins. At launch ofcourse, since codebase is similar to original pascal, the weakness was taken advantage of. There were only a few bad actors(me included) and the amount they got is very small compared to the total amount now and would be lesser and lesser as the coin grew. We can only say thank you to them for highlighting those bugs that need fixing. I only point 3 gpu on this and most complaint came from guys like me who put few gpus. I dont think it is that bad.

Edit: what's the hashrate on your testpool? You keep finding blocks. Grin

Pool works fine, I don't see any orphans or reorganization yet like in the other chain.. Seems stable. I'll test for another 24h and then we'll see.

Thanks for the pool, will you be sending out accounts for free like in pasc ?

Yes, of course. Give me 24h to test network stability, I don't want to run into the same problems here like with the other fork.

Suprnova drift 2 mins.

Code:

20/03/2017 21:20:16.009 TID:000004D4 [Update] New block height:16433 nOnce:-598997493 timestamp:1489958296 Operations:0 Fee:0 SafeBoxBalance:8217000000=8217000000

Timestamp

Code:

1489958296 = Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:18:16 GMT

2mins difference but as long as not holding that's fine.

Hmm, no drift on my side:

19 Mar 22:40:43 ntpdate[19722]: adjust time server 192.53.103.108 offset -0.003074 sec

ulfsaar

full member

Activity: 197

Merit: 100

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 01:52:22 PM

Quote from: DeCrypterManiac on March 19, 2017, 01:47:55 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 01:17:59 PM

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 19, 2017, 12:31:34 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 12:16:29 PM

Quote from: ulfsaar on March 19, 2017, 12:11:08 PM

Quote from: ocminer on March 19, 2017, 11:40:11 AM

Nope, no pool from me guys, it's just a testpool, please don't put any hash on it !

So far how do you find pascal lite?

IMHO Pascal Lite is much better (now) than the original PascalCoin since it has active dev(s) and most important: the devs actually know what they're doing

Also the Account Trading Platform is nice.

However due to the bad codebase of the original coin during launch this coin got raped instantly and the instamine was enormous, unfortunately this isn't fixable.

When dev xiphon fixed the code, we are only at block 7k, around 300k coins. At launch ofcourse, since codebase is similar to original pascal, the weakness was taken advantage of. There were only a few bad actors(me included) and the amount they got is very small compared to the total amount now and would be lesser and lesser as the coin grew. We can only say thank you to them for highlighting those bugs that need fixing. I only point 3 gpu on this and most complaint came from guys like me who put few gpus. I dont think it is that bad.

Edit: what's the hashrate on your testpool? You keep finding blocks. Grin

Pool works fine, I don't see any orphans or reorganization yet like in the other chain.. Seems stable. I'll test for another 24h and then we'll see.

Thanks for the pool, will you be sending out accounts for free like in pasc ?

Yes, of course. Give me 24h to test network stability, I don't want to run into the same problems here like with the other fork.

Suprnova drift 2 mins.

Code:

20/03/2017 21:20:16.009 TID:000004D4 [Update] New block height:16433 nOnce:-598997493 timestamp:1489958296 Operations:0 Fee:0 SafeBoxBalance:8217000000=8217000000

Timestamp

Code:

1489958296 = Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:18:16 GMT

2mins difference but as long as not holding that's fine.

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: Slava_K on March 19, 2017, 02:31:34 PM

WTF with cryptopia wallet?

The seed nodes are all fine on our end. Maybe they are doing maintenance on their wallet. Ill try and get a hold of the dev.

EDIT: Dev is aware of the issue.

EDIT: Wallet is restarted and we are looking at the issue to see what caused it

Slava_K

hero member

Activity: 677

Merit: 500

WTF with cryptopia wallet?

Topic: [ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here] - page 66. (Read 164899 times)