Topic: [ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here] - page 92. (Read 164913 times)

Quote from: hannusolo on March 04, 2017, 07:02:37 AM

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp.

But with same is accepted (or lower then real time).

I think we need node accepting for founded blocks. And wallet himself sync time by GMT. And some control sum for exe file with centralized control.

Slava_K

hero member

Activity: 677

Merit: 500

Quote from: xiphon on March 04, 2017, 08:43:20 AM

Quote from: hannusolo on March 04, 2017, 07:02:37 AM

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp.

But with same is accepted (or lower then real time).

code_honesty

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: xiphon on March 04, 2017, 08:43:20 AM

Quote from: hannusolo on March 04, 2017, 07:02:37 AM

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp.

Partially true, wetpussy and new node still shows negative.

Anyone tried wolf0 sgminer solo and found a block? started mining a few hours ago and not so lucky with 2 470rigs.

xiphon

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 121

Quote from: hannusolo on March 04, 2017, 07:02:37 AM

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp.

xiphon

full member

Activity: 254

Merit: 121

Quote from: dedmaroz on March 04, 2017, 08:19:19 AM

payload "mmcmc17300" is not my miner. Someone is hiding behind my miners

Good turn from someone whoever it is.
He should pay a rent for using your miner's name.

dedmaroz

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 255

payload "mmcmc17300" is not my miner. Someone is hiding behind my miners

code_honesty

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: hannusolo on March 04, 2017, 07:02:37 AM

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

This coins are exploited heavily already and big stakes are already in hands which are just waiting to dump.

The coin is not mature in its current state for any use, it's a pure speculators (and fpga miners) coin with custom pools and hacked / modded nodes / wallets

Agree. Eventually we'll get there on fixing this issues. I think PASL might open for your suggestions. right adaseb?

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: hannusolo on March 04, 2017, 07:02:37 AM

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

This coins are exploited heavily already and big stakes are already in hands which are just waiting to dump.

The coin is not mature in its current state for any use, it's a pure speculators (and fpga miners) coin with custom pools and hacked / modded nodes / wallets

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723