Alright everybody calm down... Lately there is too much drama in this thread.
We are trying to fix all these issues. If you want to help then go to the github and review the changes.
We are running a testnet version right now seeing if the attacks are under control.
Topic: [ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here] - page 96. (Read 164899 times)
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
All as what im saying before.
You need no to apologize, it is not a bug at all. Having the same timestamp would not help you to mine faster than others.
It is just fantasies of our coin-mate code_honesty.
And another one time again: FORGING BLOCK WITH THE SAME TIMESTAMP AS PREVIOUS BLOCK TIMESTAMP WOULD NOT HELP YOU TO MINE FASTER.
Anyone, please, STOP talking that "having the same timestamps is cheating". It is not.
Or prove here and now that this is some kind of cheating.
Really? get a life matey. If really wanna help us in this endeavor, post solution, not take advantage of this flaws. People like you nowadays with convoluted mind are thinking breaking protocol is normal, honest and regular and people should just live with it and accept it. Life wont get better if you we are to follow your lead.
Well Alpha is definitely cheating. Noticed this for a few of his blocks. Sometimes its 90 seconds ahead.
It doesn't help how we point out these bugs in public and then others read about them and exploit them.
https://i.imgsafe.org/738bfc7b8d.png
It doesn't help how we point out these bugs in public and then others read about them and exploit them.
https://i.imgsafe.org/738bfc7b8d.png
This is a daemon problem, the daemon should not accept anything with tampered time and if miner daemon is tampered, network should not accept it.
Really needs to be fixed. Can you talk to albert about this? I think he is not aware that we are ahead on bug discovery.
I do believe it is a waste, 2 devide knowlege into forks of different communities.
It is all about color. I prefer sky over earth
Hi Folks,
I do not think, I´m trolling,
even though I have 2 admit,
I´m more orientated 2 BTC or "the upstream".
I do believe it is a waste, 2 devide knowlege into forks of different communities.
ist laughting btw !
... and again, make your own guesses.
P.S. headup you can look further
I do not think, I´m trolling,
even though I have 2 admit,
I´m more orientated 2 BTC or "the upstream".
I do believe it is a waste, 2 devide knowlege into forks of different communities.
ist laughting btw !... and again, make your own guesses.
P.S. headup you can look further
Hi Folks,
I get a feeling like PASL is getting testbed 4 PASC.
I get a feeling like PASL is getting testbed 4 PASC.
By the way,
Pascal Lite is 1 month old today and over 500,000 coins mined!
LoLPascal Lite is 1 month old today and over 500,000 coins mined!
And what you are laughing for? Bad try.
To others, who can be accidentally confused with that troll's posts:
Block time is 5 minutes. Reward per block is 50 coins. 1 Month is 30 day. 1 day is 24 hours. 1 hour is 60 minutes.
now just take a calc in your hands:
minutes in 1 month = 30 *24 * 60 = 43 200 minuter in month
estimated blocks found in ideal conditions = 43 200 / 5 = 8 640 blocks per month
estimated coin supply in ideal conditions = 8 640 * 50 = 432 000 PASL per month.
So, as anyone interested can see that having 500 000 now is pretty normal.
So, trolls and haters and other bad actors, take your hands away from here. it would not be possible to disinform or confuse readers still im here
.
Hi Folks,
I get a feeling like PASL is getting testbed 4 PASC.
I get a feeling like PASL is getting testbed 4 PASC.
By the way,
Pascal Lite is 1 month old today and over 500,000 coins mined!
LoLPascal Lite is 1 month old today and over 500,000 coins mined!
A Pascal Lite/Classic/whatever was going to get launched anyway.. There were atleast two other tries Turbo and some other that could be mined with bitcoinminers 
What is this talk about banning accounts? Forget that stupidity. Who would have the power to decide which accounts get banned and which not? There can not be such an entity, it would destroy the whole coin/ idea of a blockchain. + It would not work as one can just use another account.
I´ve mined Pascal Lite and I seem to get atleast some blocks even with only two gpus. But if, and it looks like there is, an unfair advantage that some miners know how to take advantage of, it should eventually be addressed of course.. Might be best if the original Pascal dev will implement measures to combat it. But sure if someone steps up and knows how to fix the problems - it would be great. Then Pascal Lite could take a road of it´s own.
What is this talk about banning accounts? Forget that stupidity. Who would have the power to decide which accounts get banned and which not? There can not be such an entity, it would destroy the whole coin/ idea of a blockchain. + It would not work as one can just use another account.
I´ve mined Pascal Lite and I seem to get atleast some blocks even with only two gpus. But if, and it looks like there is, an unfair advantage that some miners know how to take advantage of, it should eventually be addressed of course.. Might be best if the original Pascal dev will implement measures to combat it. But sure if someone steps up and knows how to fix the problems - it would be great. Then Pascal Lite could take a road of it´s own.
I won't be banning any accounts/transaction/address or rolling back the blockchain or relaunching the coin.
By the way,
Pascal Lite is 1 month old today and over 500,000 coins mined!
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
All as what im saying before.
You need no to apologize, it is not a bug at all. Having the same timestamp would not help you to mine faster than others.
It is just fantasies of our coin-mate code_honesty.
And another one time again: FORGING BLOCK WITH THE SAME TIMESTAMP AS PREVIOUS BLOCK TIMESTAMP WOULD NOT HELP YOU TO MINE FASTER.
Anyone, please, STOP talking that "having the same timestamps is cheating". It is not.
Or prove here and now that this is some kind of cheating.
Well Alpha is definitely cheating. Noticed this for a few of his blocks. Sometimes its 90 seconds ahead.
It doesn't help how we point out these bugs in public and then others read about them and exploit them.
It doesn't help how we point out these bugs in public and then others read about them and exploit them.
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
... of course you are - same as others in upstream !
What a pitty, always the greedy ones drag down the good things .
You should be ashamed.
A Pascal Lite/Classic/whatever was going to get launched anyway.. There were atleast two other tries Turbo and some other that could be mined with bitcoinminers
What is this talk about banning accounts? Forget that stupidity. Who would have the power to decide which accounts get banned and which not? There can not be such an entity, it would destroy the whole coin/ idea of a blockchain. + It would not work as one can just use another account.
I´ve mined Pascal Lite and I seem to get atleast some blocks even with only two gpus. But if, and it looks like there is, an unfair advantage that some miners know how to take advantage of, it should eventually be addressed of course.. Might be best if the original Pascal dev will implement measures to combat it. But sure if someone steps up and knows how to fix the problems - it would be great. Then Pascal Lite could take a road of it´s own.
What is this talk about banning accounts? Forget that stupidity. Who would have the power to decide which accounts get banned and which not? There can not be such an entity, it would destroy the whole coin/ idea of a blockchain. + It would not work as one can just use another account.
I´ve mined Pascal Lite and I seem to get atleast some blocks even with only two gpus. But if, and it looks like there is, an unfair advantage that some miners know how to take advantage of, it should eventually be addressed of course.. Might be best if the original Pascal dev will implement measures to combat it. But sure if someone steps up and knows how to fix the problems - it would be great. Then Pascal Lite could take a road of it´s own.
The exact copy of pasc without any new additions, looks like a bitchy alternative to pasc. After seeing pasc being propelled up with chinese money u guys wanted to catch some of its fame and pulled this dastardly tool of deception, subsequently trying to fud the original pascal and lure its former followers into ur ruse.
it's for those that missed the pascal train, isn't this whole place for those that missed the bitcoin train? you got the point...
Beta goes alpa... Guys - STOP. Be worthy miners. PLEASE!
The exact copy of pasc without any new additions, looks like a bitchy alternative to pasc. After seeing pasc being propelled up with chinese money u guys wanted to catch some of its fame and pulled this dastardly tool of deception, subsequently trying to fud the original pascal and lure its former followers into ur ruse.
Is there a bonus for node support? 
anyway i fix bug in my mining software soon as posible
and i offering 10.000 pascalLite coins for development.
and i offering 10.000 pascalLite coins for development.
Is that 10? or 10,000?
10,000 (ten thousand)
I'm looking into creating a Block Explorer, but it will take me some time. I've never done it before. I've got a server already that I can use, but will take some time to figure it out. I will keep everyone updated.
anyway i fix bug in my mining software soon as posible
and i offering 10.000 pascalLite coins for development.
and i offering 10.000 pascalLite coins for development.
Thank you very much adaseb will get in touch with you.
anyway i fix bug in my mining software soon as posible
and i offering 10.000 pascalLite coins for development.
and i offering 10.000 pascalLite coins for development.
Is that 10? or 10,000?
Jump to: