So it's the user's fault that they get an 404 error from each wallet link on the OP? Insanity, it would take somebody five seconds to correct the OP. Why can't you take the feedback and do something correct the issue.
What can generate errors in the user is to massively animate and even tick mandatory updates that require a technical skill that not all have.
Not updating the provisional versions until a definitive one is no disrespect to the community ... on the contrary, it can save many unnecessary errors ... and it is very important that the steps in the good direction are solid, so much for the arrangement of the problem as for the image of seriousness of the project towards users who are not yet inside.
I guess there is a misunderstanding. I'll try to be as clear as possible. I personally get angry from 404-errors. If some project, into which I might put money into, gives me plenty of 404-errors (like the OP, without any explanation), I'll likely lose my trust. This is common sense, I don't understand how could somebody argue against it.
Why not add the link for the RC3-wallet version in the OP and gray out the 404-error links? Also, why not gray out the 404-error-links in the website?
It could be my fault, sorry .
My post, more than an allusion to the specific error you comment, was generally in the face of continuous references to user failures, when:
1- A great technical level of the users is not demandable, just as it was not at the moment of investment and entrance to the project.
2- In its limitations, I understand that the users have obeyed the official slogans continuously and executed the arranged means.