When you post issues, please wait for MiningPoolHub to respond.
Every pool ends up with people flaming about low payouts; hashrates are direct influence to payments but pools are not paying you for hashrates.
If you have a genuine issue then kindly report it and wait for him to respond.
In the meantime, you have access to all the information about the pool's findings and your shares:
https://monero.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks
https://monero.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=dashboard
Topic: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin. - page 197. (Read 487870 times)
September 07, 2017, 05:23:05 AM
September 07, 2017, 04:58:01 AM
Hello,
anyone experiencing very low Monero payouts, like 30-40% lower then they should be according to given hash rate?
Thanks!
anyone experiencing very low Monero payouts, like 30-40% lower then they should be according to given hash rate?
Thanks!
Extremely low payouts now...goodbye miningpoolhub!
September 07, 2017, 01:01:19 AM
Got my Baikal Giant+ on your pool right now.. Though it's only half working one of the hash boards is out waiting for reply to see about getting the new hash board replacement.
Now is there a place on your pool to check out hash power on your pool?
Second issue how do I go about setting up auto exchange with an exchange wallet for payout?
Thanks
Now is there a place on your pool to check out hash power on your pool?
Second issue how do I go about setting up auto exchange with an exchange wallet for payout?
Thanks
September 07, 2017, 12:31:36 AM
What do you mean hired help?
You can help me to add some new cryptocoins? That would be awesome.
Or you can make some super easy GUI one click miner like nicehash?
Yes, adding the new cryptocoins would be very doable.
I'm not a GUI programmer so on the one click miner (which is a great idea), I doubt I would be of much use.
September 06, 2017, 07:49:43 PM
why miningpoolhub always shows less hashrate than i have?
2x GTX 970, miner shows 2042 kH/s, pool shows 1491kH/s
Ryzen 1600X, miner shows 450kH/s, pool shows 224kH/s
i5 7300HQ, miner shows 349kH/s, pool shows 93kH/s
GTX 1050, miner shows 495kH/s, pool shows 194kH/s
Im mining Zcoin
2x GTX 970, miner shows 2042 kH/s, pool shows 1491kH/s
Ryzen 1600X, miner shows 450kH/s, pool shows 224kH/s
i5 7300HQ, miner shows 349kH/s, pool shows 93kH/s
GTX 1050, miner shows 495kH/s, pool shows 194kH/s
Im mining Zcoin
I have a similar problem in Monero.
Sometimes I get 0.32 XMR a day and the next couple of days with one more GPU mining and a optimization of some Kh/s on all the rigs I get only 0.28 XMR.
Any clue?
I have another question.
What is "(Shrunk accumulated Credit transactions)"?
September 06, 2017, 04:42:56 PM
why miningpoolhub always shows less hashrate than i have?
2x GTX 970, miner shows 2042 kH/s, pool shows 1491kH/s
Ryzen 1600X, miner shows 450kH/s, pool shows 224kH/s
i5 7300HQ, miner shows 349kH/s, pool shows 93kH/s
GTX 1050, miner shows 495kH/s, pool shows 194kH/s
Im mining Zcoin
2x GTX 970, miner shows 2042 kH/s, pool shows 1491kH/s
Ryzen 1600X, miner shows 450kH/s, pool shows 224kH/s
i5 7300HQ, miner shows 349kH/s, pool shows 93kH/s
GTX 1050, miner shows 495kH/s, pool shows 194kH/s
Im mining Zcoin
September 06, 2017, 10:27:03 AM
Hello,
anyone experiencing very low Monero payouts, like 30-40% lower then they should be according to given hash rate?
Thanks!
anyone experiencing very low Monero payouts, like 30-40% lower then they should be according to given hash rate?
Thanks!
September 05, 2017, 08:46:43 PM
@miningpoolhub
-p sd=xxx doesn't seem to work for digibyte-skein. I keep seeing "Stratum difficulty set to yyy" where yyy is WAY higher/lower than what I specified & it varies.
-p sd=xxx doesn't seem to work for digibyte-skein. I keep seeing "Stratum difficulty set to yyy" where yyy is WAY higher/lower than what I specified & it varies.
What number did you input?
min static diff is 1 currently.
I tried 6,5,4,3. All integer values. Could it be because I'm using the switching port for skein rather than a specific coin port?
Oh only speicifc coin ports will be working.
Oh that transaction was lost due to orphan block.
I resent those transactions again.
Thanks a lot, highly appreciated!I resent those transactions again.
FYI, if you type below command you would be able to check from your side what happened.
zcash-cli gettransaction f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
Is there a web interface available somewhere for doing these kind of checks? I don't work on the command line...zcash-cli gettransaction f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
I believe there's no such tools for that.
What does PPLNS Target on the dashboard page mean? What does the value indicate?
Round length is average of last N blocks'
This is called PPLNS target which sum of all shares for that round.
This is not that important data. When accumulated shares are below that PPLNS share target and found block, then it means it's lucky.
hello miningpoolhub.
I am trying to auto algo switch with a simple batch file below ( NVIDIA - ethash, equihash ).
I am on windows10pro using ethminer v0.11.0 and ewbf v0.3.4b with batch file below:
ethminer exits properly when algo is switch from ethash -> equihash.
ewbf miner does not exit properly and just keeps running at 0 Sols/s when algo is switched from equihash -> ethash.
What am I doing wrong? Please help.
I am trying to auto algo switch with a simple batch file below ( NVIDIA - ethash, equihash ).
I am on windows10pro using ethminer v0.11.0 and ewbf v0.3.4b with batch file below:
Code:
:start
ethminer --farm-retries 0 -FS exit --cuda --dag-load-mode parallel -S asia.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:12020 -O henyojess.w1:x
miner --eexit 3 --server asia.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com --user henyojess.w1 --pass x --port 12023
timeout 1
goto start
ethminer --farm-retries 0 -FS exit --cuda --dag-load-mode parallel -S asia.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:12020 -O henyojess.w1:x
miner --eexit 3 --server asia.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com --user henyojess.w1 --pass x --port 12023
timeout 1
goto start
ethminer exits properly when algo is switch from ethash -> equihash.
ewbf miner does not exit properly and just keeps running at 0 Sols/s when algo is switched from equihash -> ethash.
Code:
GPU0: 254 Sol/s GPU1: 265 Sol/s GPU2: 256 Sol/s GPU3: 263 Sol/s GPU4: 258 Sol/s GPU5: 259 Sol/s
Total speed: 1555 Sol/s
ERROR: Lost connection with the server.
INFO: Attempt to restore connection.
ERROR: Stratum authorization error
Temp: GPU0: 53C GPU1: 53C GPU2: 53C GPU3: 55C GPU4: 54C GPU5: 52C
GPU0: 0 Sol/s GPU1: 0 Sol/s GPU2: 0 Sol/s GPU3: 0 Sol/s GPU4: 0 Sol/s GPU5: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 1555 Sol/s
ERROR: Lost connection with the server.
INFO: Attempt to restore connection.
ERROR: Stratum authorization error
Temp: GPU0: 53C GPU1: 53C GPU2: 53C GPU3: 55C GPU4: 54C GPU5: 52C
GPU0: 0 Sol/s GPU1: 0 Sol/s GPU2: 0 Sol/s GPU3: 0 Sol/s GPU4: 0 Sol/s GPU5: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
What am I doing wrong? Please help.
This is well known issue of ewbf. Please tell me if anyone found way to fix this EWBF's bug.
September 05, 2017, 07:48:04 PM
hello miningpoolhub.
I am trying to auto algo switch with a simple batch file below ( NVIDIA - ethash, equihash ).
I am on windows10pro using ethminer v0.11.0 and ewbf v0.3.4b with batch file below:
ethminer exits properly when algo is switch from ethash -> equihash.
ewbf miner does not exit properly and just keeps running at 0 Sols/s when algo is switched from equihash -> ethash.
What am I doing wrong? Please help.
I am trying to auto algo switch with a simple batch file below ( NVIDIA - ethash, equihash ).
I am on windows10pro using ethminer v0.11.0 and ewbf v0.3.4b with batch file below:
Code:
:start
ethminer --farm-retries 0 -FS exit --cuda --dag-load-mode parallel -S asia.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:12020 -O henyojess.w1:x
miner --eexit 3 --server asia.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com --user henyojess.w1 --pass x --port 12023
timeout 1
goto start
ethminer --farm-retries 0 -FS exit --cuda --dag-load-mode parallel -S asia.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:12020 -O henyojess.w1:x
miner --eexit 3 --server asia.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com --user henyojess.w1 --pass x --port 12023
timeout 1
goto start
ethminer exits properly when algo is switch from ethash -> equihash.
ewbf miner does not exit properly and just keeps running at 0 Sols/s when algo is switched from equihash -> ethash.
Code:
GPU0: 254 Sol/s GPU1: 265 Sol/s GPU2: 256 Sol/s GPU3: 263 Sol/s GPU4: 258 Sol/s GPU5: 259 Sol/s
Total speed: 1555 Sol/s
ERROR: Lost connection with the server.
INFO: Attempt to restore connection.
ERROR: Stratum authorization error
Temp: GPU0: 53C GPU1: 53C GPU2: 53C GPU3: 55C GPU4: 54C GPU5: 52C
GPU0: 0 Sol/s GPU1: 0 Sol/s GPU2: 0 Sol/s GPU3: 0 Sol/s GPU4: 0 Sol/s GPU5: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 1555 Sol/s
ERROR: Lost connection with the server.
INFO: Attempt to restore connection.
ERROR: Stratum authorization error
Temp: GPU0: 53C GPU1: 53C GPU2: 53C GPU3: 55C GPU4: 54C GPU5: 52C
GPU0: 0 Sol/s GPU1: 0 Sol/s GPU2: 0 Sol/s GPU3: 0 Sol/s GPU4: 0 Sol/s GPU5: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
What am I doing wrong? Please help.
September 05, 2017, 01:30:04 PM
What does PPLNS Target on the dashboard page mean? What does the value indicate?
September 05, 2017, 02:54:47 AM
Oh that transaction was lost due to orphan block.
I resent those transactions again.
Thanks a lot, highly appreciated!I resent those transactions again.
FYI, if you type below command you would be able to check from your side what happened.
zcash-cli gettransaction f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
Is there a web interface available somewhere for doing these kind of checks? I don't work on the command line... zcash-cli gettransaction f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
September 04, 2017, 10:07:20 PM
@miningpoolhub
-p sd=xxx doesn't seem to work for digibyte-skein. I keep seeing "Stratum difficulty set to yyy" where yyy is WAY higher/lower than what I specified & it varies.
-p sd=xxx doesn't seem to work for digibyte-skein. I keep seeing "Stratum difficulty set to yyy" where yyy is WAY higher/lower than what I specified & it varies.
What number did you input?
min static diff is 1 currently.
I tried 6,5,4,3. All integer values. Could it be because I'm using the switching port for skein rather than a specific coin port?
September 04, 2017, 08:50:25 PM
@MiningPoolHub
could you please check internal transactionID 8579013 (on the Zcash pool) - it shows as confirmed but never arrived.
The given TX # link results in a 404 on zchain.in:
https://explorer.zcha.in/transactions/f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
Manually searching for f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41 also results in a 404.
Please help!
Cheers
could you please check internal transactionID 8579013 (on the Zcash pool) - it shows as confirmed but never arrived.
The given TX # link results in a 404 on zchain.in:
https://explorer.zcha.in/transactions/f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
Manually searching for f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41 also results in a 404.
Please help!
Cheers
Oh that transaction was lost due to orphan block.
I resent those transactions again.
Zcash based coins have similar problems. Transactions are lost when included block is found orphan. It doesn't happen all the time, but happens time to time.
FYI, if you type below command you would be able to check from your side what happened.
zcash-cli gettransaction f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
{
"amount": 0.00000000,
"confirmations": -1,
"txid": "f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41",
"walletconflicts": [
"07440f8ac623843d83eb2dd81ea4af38d3e15cecc2971122fc35f233f16442ae"
],
"time": 1504555957,
"timereceived": 1504555957,
"vjoinsplit": [
{
......
}
September 04, 2017, 08:40:42 PM
Sadly, I think you mined at unlucky time period.
https://zcash.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=177937&prev=1
177790 block was found at 20:04:02
177866 block was found at 23:07:13 resulting 409% unlucky block.
As pool uses PPLNS, early hashrates can be totally omitted.
http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/
https://zcash.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=177937&prev=1
177790 block was found at 20:04:02
177866 block was found at 23:07:13 resulting 409% unlucky block.
As pool uses PPLNS, early hashrates can be totally omitted.
http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/
yes, that's what I figured out myself in the meantime as well. Thanks for confirming!
btw, is there a way of tracking the results (i.e. 'balances') of individual WORKERS? Ideally even searchable for any timeframe that I'd like to look at?
No you need to separate to several account to track each earnings.
Workers are not intended for balance tracking, but to check rig status.
@miningpoolhub
-p sd=xxx doesn't seem to work for digibyte-skein. I keep seeing "Stratum difficulty set to yyy" where yyy is WAY higher/lower than what I specified & it varies.
-p sd=xxx doesn't seem to work for digibyte-skein. I keep seeing "Stratum difficulty set to yyy" where yyy is WAY higher/lower than what I specified & it varies.
What number did you input?
min static diff is 1 currently.
@miningpoolhub
*wish list - 1) a way to manually monero payout to a bittrex address, where we can add the payment id
from bittrex "To deposit coins, use the Base Address and payment_id in the transfer command:
transfer 1 [Base Addresss] [amount] [Payment_Id]"
- 2) coins lbry, decred, pascal, aurora (scrypt)
*poloniex - how do you handle poloniex? I have problems with deposits there all the time where coins get stuck for weeks, yet that never happens with your auto-exchange.
*hired help - maybe there's a way to have a software dev help with the site just for a reduction in pool fees
If you would be interested in discussing it, you can contact me at the email address associated with mph userID: 61192
*wish list - 1) a way to manually monero payout to a bittrex address, where we can add the payment id
from bittrex "To deposit coins, use the Base Address and payment_id in the transfer command:
transfer 1 [Base Addresss] [amount] [Payment_Id]"
- 2) coins lbry, decred, pascal, aurora (scrypt)
*poloniex - how do you handle poloniex? I have problems with deposits there all the time where coins get stuck for weeks, yet that never happens with your auto-exchange.
*hired help - maybe there's a way to have a software dev help with the site just for a reduction in pool fees
If you would be interested in discussing it, you can contact me at the email address associated with mph userID: 61192
1. You can insert bittrex address in "baseaddress.paymentid" form.
Insert dot between baseaddrss and paymentid. It's already stated at Monero pool main page.
2. I'll add coins you asked.
Most coins are routed to bittrex these days. Only some well working coins are exchanged through Poloniex. Bittrex has higher priority if price is similar.
Also when poloniex doesn't confirm some deposits, I recover them from my pocket.
What do you mean hired help?
You can help me to add some new cryptocoins? That would be awesome.
Or you can make some super easy GUI one click miner like nicehash?
September 04, 2017, 06:14:51 PM
@MiningPoolHub
could you please check internal transactionID 8579013 (on the Zcash pool) - it shows as confirmed but never arrived.
The given TX # link results in a 404 on zchain.in:
https://explorer.zcha.in/transactions/f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
Manually searching for f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41 also results in a 404.
Please help!
Cheers
could you please check internal transactionID 8579013 (on the Zcash pool) - it shows as confirmed but never arrived.
The given TX # link results in a 404 on zchain.in:
https://explorer.zcha.in/transactions/f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41
Manually searching for f543218add1ae51d3cbf2298f1312aeb2f64b409828683819413742da1b83c41 also results in a 404.
Please help!
Cheers
September 04, 2017, 11:31:47 AM
@miningpoolhub
*wish list - 1) a way to manually monero payout to a bittrex address, where we can add the payment id
from bittrex "To deposit coins, use the Base Address and payment_id in the transfer command:
transfer 1 [Base Addresss] [amount] [Payment_Id]"
- 2) coins lbry, decred, pascal, aurora (scrypt)
*poloniex - how do you handle poloniex? I have problems with deposits there all the time where coins get stuck for weeks, yet that never happens with your auto-exchange.
*hired help - maybe there's a way to have a software dev help with the site just for a reduction in pool fees
If you would be interested in discussing it, you can contact me at the email address associated with mph userID: 61192
*wish list - 1) a way to manually monero payout to a bittrex address, where we can add the payment id
from bittrex "To deposit coins, use the Base Address and payment_id in the transfer command:
transfer 1 [Base Addresss] [amount] [Payment_Id]"
- 2) coins lbry, decred, pascal, aurora (scrypt)
*poloniex - how do you handle poloniex? I have problems with deposits there all the time where coins get stuck for weeks, yet that never happens with your auto-exchange.
*hired help - maybe there's a way to have a software dev help with the site just for a reduction in pool fees
If you would be interested in discussing it, you can contact me at the email address associated with mph userID: 61192
September 04, 2017, 06:00:10 AM
@miningpoolhub
-p sd=xxx doesn't seem to work for digibyte-skein. I keep seeing "Stratum difficulty set to yyy" where yyy is WAY higher/lower than what I specified & it varies.
-p sd=xxx doesn't seem to work for digibyte-skein. I keep seeing "Stratum difficulty set to yyy" where yyy is WAY higher/lower than what I specified & it varies.
September 04, 2017, 04:14:43 AM
Sadly, I think you mined at unlucky time period.
https://zcash.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=177937&prev=1
177790 block was found at 20:04:02
177866 block was found at 23:07:13 resulting 409% unlucky block.
As pool uses PPLNS, early hashrates can be totally omitted.
http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/
https://zcash.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=177937&prev=1
177790 block was found at 20:04:02
177866 block was found at 23:07:13 resulting 409% unlucky block.
As pool uses PPLNS, early hashrates can be totally omitted.
http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/
yes, that's what I figured out myself in the meantime as well. Thanks for confirming!
btw, is there a way of tracking the results (i.e. 'balances') of individual WORKERS? Ideally even searchable for any timeframe that I'd like to look at?
September 04, 2017, 03:58:25 AM
@mph
Please add ZEN!
It was asked so many times.
The coin itself is getting more and more popular every day, team is very active.
There are few other pools but I would like to mine on yours.
Please add ZEN!
It was asked so many times.
The coin itself is getting more and more popular every day, team is very active.
There are few other pools but I would like to mine on yours.
okay. I'll do my best.
+1 for adding decred.
Almost everyone who mines dagger hashimoto on MPH also mines Decred in dual mode using another pool.
And most of that people would switch to MPH as soon as Decred will be available for mining.
Almost everyone who mines dagger hashimoto on MPH also mines Decred in dual mode using another pool.
And most of that people would switch to MPH as soon as Decred will be available for mining.
Yeah. Thank you for suggestion. I'll do my best.
I tried mining Zcoin, no matter what did I was only getting 50% of my actual speed and reward, only on this Zcoin subpool, other MPH pools work great 4 me.
used atest TP ccminer.
used atest TP ccminer.
It's already reported issue from zcoin ccminer users for few months ago.
sgminer doesn't have problem like this.
I already contacted ccminer dev, he also didn't have solution about it. I have no idea what pool can do with this.
Mr MPH,
Can you please lower the update interval on the API so multipoolminer and similar software can work accurately and efficiently? The current (upto 30 minutes) refresh interval is just too long and causes issues with the calculation of the profitability of some of the coins. Moreover by providing a quicker refresh, multipoolminer in general (and also the users) would benefit from frequently updated (and therefore more accurate) data.
I know you are a busy bee but please prioritise this one.
Thanks.
Can you please lower the update interval on the API so multipoolminer and similar software can work accurately and efficiently? The current (upto 30 minutes) refresh interval is just too long and causes issues with the calculation of the profitability of some of the coins. Moreover by providing a quicker refresh, multipoolminer in general (and also the users) would benefit from frequently updated (and therefore more accurate) data.
I know you are a busy bee but please prioritise this one.
Thanks.
Actually this caching is done from cloudflare I configured. There's no shorter time interval for this currently.
I'll find better way for this.
I tried mining Zcoin, no matter what did I was only getting 50% of my actual speed and reward, only on this Zcoin subpool, other MPH pools work great 4 me.
used atest TP ccminer.
used atest TP ccminer.
Same here. Half of my speed at Zcoin pool. I don't know why, but..
at DGB-GROESTL i have 1900 speed, pool only shows max only 1500.
So cleary pool works bad or dev take more fees..
At another pools like flypool, ethermine all OK.
So problems at pool side
Have you tried static diff? It would be better for digibyte coin.
Also check hashrate from Graphs page. Dashboard and Workers page is not accurate because it samples shares for only last few minutes.
I believe there's no digibyte pool from flypool or ethermine.
hashrate calculation, miner efficiency are totally different between coins.
@MiningPoolHub
Please can you check that these algorithms are following the NiceHash stratum protocol to ensure compatibility with Excavator miner:
Equihash - NiceHash and Zpool works but MiningPoolHub does not
Lyra2re2 - NiceHash and Zpool works but MiningPoolHub does not
Ethash - NiceHash works but MiningPoolHub does not
Your Sia pool is also not compatible with anything but Claymore miners.
Please can you check that these algorithms are following the NiceHash stratum protocol to ensure compatibility with Excavator miner:
Equihash - NiceHash and Zpool works but MiningPoolHub does not
Lyra2re2 - NiceHash and Zpool works but MiningPoolHub does not
Ethash - NiceHash works but MiningPoolHub does not
Your Sia pool is also not compatible with anything but Claymore miners.
I'm not familiar with excavator yet but found that it works when I input real IP address instead of pool host name.
I posted issue at their github repository.
https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/issues/51
Very weird bug.
@MiningPoolHub
Yesterday I sent by mistake a BURST of hashpower to 17023 which shows up on my worker's Zcash hashrate graph:
Unfortunately however it seems like I haven't been credited at all for this hashpower.
Is that normal?
I know that sending bursts is NOT the most efficient way of using pools, but getting NOTHING is not quite what I've expected.
Maybe you could elaborate a bit on what has happened there? That would help me a lot in better understanding how exactly your pool works.
Cheers!
Yesterday I sent by mistake a BURST of hashpower to 17023 which shows up on my worker's Zcash hashrate graph:
Unfortunately however it seems like I haven't been credited at all for this hashpower.
Is that normal?
I know that sending bursts is NOT the most efficient way of using pools, but getting NOTHING is not quite what I've expected.
Maybe you could elaborate a bit on what has happened there? That would help me a lot in better understanding how exactly your pool works.
Cheers!
Sadly, I think you mined at unlucky time period.
https://zcash.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks&height=177937&prev=1
177790 block was found at 20:04:02
177866 block was found at 23:07:13 resulting 409% unlucky block.
As pool uses PPLNS, early hashrates can be totally omitted.
http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/
September 03, 2017, 01:36:05 PM
well at least for short time high-rate hashing
Jump to: