[ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 106.

Saponetta

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: papacheal on January 27, 2018, 06:14:25 PM

Quote from: Saponetta on January 27, 2018, 05:10:38 PM

Quote from: papacheal on January 27, 2018, 05:07:20 PM

Woohoo! Making progress in Neoscrypt now.

For those of you using Neoscrypt, I'd advise switching to Excavator 1.4.1a release for a Windows-based miner. It outperforms all Neoscrypt miners I've dealt with for most cards, assuming you're on 9.1 CUDA support and latest drivers. Don't trust the hashrate numbers coming out of HSRMiner; Palgin is a great guy, but the miner misrepresents what is actually doing at a pool level and has problems with hashrate dropoff over time.

What are you getting with latest excavator?

1080Ti (105% pwr, +100 core, +250 mem) = avg just over 1.69 MH/s
1070 (no OC) = avg just over 1.00 MH/s

On my 4x1080Ti + 1x1070 rig, I was getting about 7.3 MH/s with KlausT. Excavator 1.4.1a gets me 7.76 MH/s. Palgin HSRMiner reports over 8 MH/s (after a 15 minute warmup period), but that doesn't match the pool reported hash rate and it starts to drop off after 30 minutes or so (and comes with a devfee).

https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/releases/download/v1.4.1a/excavator_v1.4.1a_NVIDIA_Win64_CUDA_9.1.zip

Nice find It does perform better then klaust. thank you!

papacheal

newbie

Activity: 67

Merit: 0

Quote from: Saponetta on January 27, 2018, 05:10:38 PM

Quote from: papacheal on January 27, 2018, 05:07:20 PM

Woohoo! Making progress in Neoscrypt now.

For those of you using Neoscrypt, I'd advise switching to Excavator 1.4.1a release for a Windows-based miner. It outperforms all Neoscrypt miners I've dealt with for most cards, assuming you're on 9.1 CUDA support and latest drivers. Don't trust the hashrate numbers coming out of HSRMiner; Palgin is a great guy, but the miner misrepresents what is actually doing at a pool level and has problems with hashrate dropoff over time.

What are you getting with latest excavator?

1080Ti (105% pwr, +100 core, +250 mem) = avg just over 1.69 MH/s
1070 (no OC) = avg just over 1.00 MH/s

On my 4x1080Ti + 1x1070 rig, I was getting about 7.3 MH/s with KlausT. Excavator 1.4.1a gets me 7.76 MH/s. Palgin HSRMiner reports over 8 MH/s (after a 15 minute warmup period), but that doesn't match the pool reported hash rate and it starts to drop off after 30 minutes or so (and comes with a devfee).

https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/releases/download/v1.4.1a/excavator_v1.4.1a_NVIDIA_Win64_CUDA_9.1.zip

josli

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: pinpins on January 27, 2018, 03:44:15 PM

Quote from: josli on January 27, 2018, 01:51:48 PM

Hey could you add Vaperscoin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annvprc-vaperscoin-scrypt-1489456 for scrypt it is sometimes very profitable even with small hashrate.

Hi
I can added, but after quick check it appears website and block explorer are all malware, how do we know that coin daemon is not?

Perhaps, I am paranoidal a bit , but makes me worry. Do you think many would mine it?

I just saw the coin on an other popular pool, and it is very profitable there sometimes. I see now that there might be an issue with showing the network hashrate with vaperscoin.

Fromage

sr. member

Activity: 338

Merit: 250

Quote from: pinpins on January 27, 2018, 05:15:36 PM

Quote from: Fromage on January 27, 2018, 04:38:29 PM

We are all trying to help you

From another pool site.....

Unfortunately, Crowdcoin CRC (neoscrypt) appears to have a chain split, and the pool ended up being in the shorter side of the split even though the pool is connected to 46 peers. Upon re-syncing to the longer chain, the pool had approximately 750 CRC orphaned during the 4 hours of mining on this split chain. This will affect miner's immature unconfirmed pending balance because orphans cannot get confirmed or cleared. It's sad that some coin's network just isn't well built. If you guys, as miners, see any "too good to be true" profit estimates, or long continuous streams of single coin blocks, it is probably too good to be true, and please contact us immediately to stop the coin.

Fromage

Belive or not, but looks like we are good on CRC. At least from first look.
And anyway would not be affected, as didin't find any coin there. But let's keep an eye

Ok, time to get some sleep. See you folks, hope blockchains are not that nasty tonight

Sounds good! Just will wait now for btc payment and everything should be tiggidy-boo for now

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Quote from: Fromage on January 27, 2018, 04:38:29 PM

We are all trying to help you

From another pool site.....

Unfortunately, Crowdcoin CRC (neoscrypt) appears to have a chain split, and the pool ended up being in the shorter side of the split even though the pool is connected to 46 peers. Upon re-syncing to the longer chain, the pool had approximately 750 CRC orphaned during the 4 hours of mining on this split chain. This will affect miner's immature unconfirmed pending balance because orphans cannot get confirmed or cleared. It's sad that some coin's network just isn't well built. If you guys, as miners, see any "too good to be true" profit estimates, or long continuous streams of single coin blocks, it is probably too good to be true, and please contact us immediately to stop the coin.

Fromage

Belive or not, but looks like we are good on CRC. At least from first look.
And anyway would not be affected, as didin't find any coin there. But let's keep an eye

Ok, time to get some sleep. See you folks, hope blockchains are not that nasty tonight

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Quote from: Saponetta on January 27, 2018, 04:33:02 PM

While skunk is ok and doesn't have that right?

Yes, skunk is ok. SONO should give us 1 coin, and it does so

Saponetta

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: papacheal on January 27, 2018, 05:07:20 PM

Woohoo! Making progress in Neoscrypt now.

For those of you using Neoscrypt, I'd advise switching to Excavator 1.4.1a release for a Windows-based miner. It outperforms all Neoscrypt miners I've dealt with for most cards, assuming you're on 9.1 CUDA support and latest drivers. Don't trust the hashrate numbers coming out of HSRMiner; Palgin is a great guy, but the miner misrepresents what is actually doing at a pool level and has problems with hashrate dropoff over time.

What are you getting with latest excavator?

papacheal

newbie

Activity: 67

Merit: 0

Woohoo! Making progress in Neoscrypt now.

For those of you using Neoscrypt, I'd advise switching to Excavator 1.4.1a release for a Windows-based miner. It outperforms all Neoscrypt miners I've dealt with for most cards, assuming you're on 9.1 CUDA support and latest drivers. Don't trust the hashrate numbers coming out of HSRMiner; Palgin is a great guy, but the miner misrepresents what is actually doing at a pool level and has problems with hashrate dropoff over time.

Fromage

sr. member

Activity: 338

Merit: 250

We are all trying to help you

From another pool site.....

Unfortunately, Crowdcoin CRC (neoscrypt) appears to have a chain split, and the pool ended up being in the shorter side of the split even though the pool is connected to 46 peers. Upon re-syncing to the longer chain, the pool had approximately 750 CRC orphaned during the 4 hours of mining on this split chain. This will affect miner's immature unconfirmed pending balance because orphans cannot get confirmed or cleared. It's sad that some coin's network just isn't well built. If you guys, as miners, see any "too good to be true" profit estimates, or long continuous streams of single coin blocks, it is probably too good to be true, and please contact us immediately to stop the coin.

Saponetta

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

While skunk is ok and doesn't have that right?

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Quote from: Saponetta on January 27, 2018, 04:17:39 PM

Getting some weird numbers, no idea if the api is jumpy or what.
I see the btc/day value jump a lot and sometimes pretty high (was wondering if it forked like Altcom or if everything is running ok)

Wink

Yes, thank you. I have corrected. In BSD case we actaully must pay 20 BSD to master nodes, in VSX 40 out of 80.
I changed config, now it must represent correct estimates.

guytechie

hero member

Activity: 677

Merit: 500

Yeah, seeing strangely high BTC/Day numbers for Xevan, just like we saw for Skunk earlier.

Saponetta

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Getting some weird numbers, no idea if the api is jumpy or what.
I see the btc/day value jump a lot and sometimes pretty high (was wondering if it forked like Altcom or if everything is running ok)

Wink

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Quote from: Saponetta on January 27, 2018, 03:59:16 PM

Is there a problem with xevan numbers using sniffdog? Shocked

Could you please ellaborate more?

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Quote from: Boobaloops on January 27, 2018, 03:51:24 PM

My balance was 0.0045 yesterday and today is 0.00028290 so whats the problem?

Wallet: 1QEFe5w8iXFnm4JdX4BAnaxzCS5rHrUfE5

The problem is that all we(including me) were mining wrong ALTCOM chain, and were becoming rich very fast, but unfortunately it was wrong chain so all blocks are orphans, and balances are adjusted accordingly.
This is unfrotunate, but the way blockchains sometimes behave.

Justice Ranger

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

I hope the server maintenance is what caused my Total Earned to drop an order of magnitude. I was at about 0.0016 maybe more and now I'm at 0.00014. What's the deal? Wallet: 186GKN6QthkcBLota3xJFVJZDHtLErFkLo

Saponetta

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Is there a problem with xevan numbers using sniffdog? Shocked

Boobaloops

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

My balance was 0.0045 yesterday and today is 0.00028290 so whats the problem?

Wallet: 1QEFe5w8iXFnm4JdX4BAnaxzCS5rHrUfE5

Fromage

sr. member

Activity: 338

Merit: 250

Quote from: pinpins on January 27, 2018, 03:42:02 PM

Quote from: Fromage on January 27, 2018, 03:31:03 PM

Quote from: pinpins on January 27, 2018, 03:26:14 PM

Quote from: Fromage on January 27, 2018, 03:22:11 PM

oppps bitcoin balance no tx id..

but I'm sure it will be returned and resent right?

No worries, it just too many things to sort out the same time

, hint me once again on your wallet address.

And this AMS wallet drives me nuts, it is again behind....!!! Huh

Just check your logs... you will see that probably nobody got a bitcoin tx id...I have multiple accounts on here not just my default one

IMHO... I would turn off AMS for now... looks like you will always have problems when bitsend drives almost 700mhs to xevan causing ams to be an instant mine... could be hard on the wallet and chain

if that is how it all works

Yes, you perhaps right regarding AMS.

Checked BTC, so yes. Our balance on exhange is 0.02886674BTC, with withdrawal limit 0.03 BTC. I would really appreciate if you can wait until it arrives, otherwise I will send my personal BTC to pool BTC to cover your earnings. Let me know, thank you

Yeah no need to start doing that out of your own pocket...we know you are just starting out.... some won't have patience as much.... just trying to help you out and maybe to others as to why they didn't get paid...

Your honesty is your best policy

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Quote from: josli on January 27, 2018, 01:51:48 PM

Hey could you add Vaperscoin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annvprc-vaperscoin-scrypt-1489456 for scrypt it is sometimes very profitable even with small hashrate.

Hi
I can added, but after quick check it appears website and block explorer are all malware, how do we know that coin daemon is not?

Perhaps, I am paranoidal a bit , but makes me worry. Do you think many would mine it?

Topic: [ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 106. (Read 57845 times)