So how is everyone mining? Using the pool to decide or just a specific coin?
I'm currently mining a specific coin, wondering when the time will come when we switch to pool determined coin.
Topic: [ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 110. (Read 57959 times)
January 24, 2018, 06:05:54 AM
January 24, 2018, 05:33:01 AM
Software is upgraded on server
January 24, 2018, 04:24:07 AM
Are you certain regarding AMS?
https://www.amsterdamblockchain.info/ shows the same zergpool.com. Also pool updates website not as frequently as blockchain is, you can find correct block height by looking into mining command line output.
PS: I will join you in ORB then!
At the time, the miner output was off by about 20 blocks with the live blockchain output (https://www.amsterdamblockchain.info). It has since corrected itself and I mined a few blocks to prove it.
I'm back on ORB again. I can't understand how I haven't been able to hit once of these ORB coins yet...Combined we're about 10% of the network hash rate and the TTF for the coin should be about 20 mins with a 3.385 diff. I'm going to stay on this until we get at least one block to prove it's possible. I'd like to rally more support for the Neoscrypt coins from pool members as most of the other coins have sky-high difficulties only for monster rigs/rentals/ASIC farms.
Yes, this is really weird, I stayed on this coin entire night and nothing. I did some investigation and actually many blocks are POS based, and we are not part of them unfortunately. POW is very rare and found every hour only, so count our hash rate. It kind of explain this
January 24, 2018, 03:01:52 AM
January 23, 2018, 07:49:27 PM
Are you certain regarding AMS?
https://www.amsterdamblockchain.info/ shows the same zergpool.com. Also pool updates website not as frequently as blockchain is, you can find correct block height by looking into mining command line output.
PS: I will join you in ORB then!
At the time, the miner output was off by about 20 blocks with the live blockchain output (https://www.amsterdamblockchain.info). It has since corrected itself and I mined a few blocks to prove it.
I'm back on ORB again. I can't understand how I haven't been able to hit once of these ORB coins yet...Combined we're about 10% of the network hash rate and the TTF for the coin should be about 20 mins with a 3.385 diff. I'm going to stay on this until we get at least one block to prove it's possible. I'd like to rally more support for the Neoscrypt coins from pool members as most of the other coins have sky-high difficulties only for monster rigs/rentals/ASIC farms.
January 23, 2018, 05:30:28 PM
I'm seeing a bunch of EWBF on my page
http://zergpool.com/?address=1AMQg6m9GPDN9HGuC3wJGpSuiZr1XQXjxi
http://zergpool.com/?address=1AMQg6m9GPDN9HGuC3wJGpSuiZr1XQXjxi
January 23, 2018, 04:50:55 PM
Hello,
the pools looks very interesting. I just pointed a miner to scrypt algo, but i see that the pools finds no blocks even when i added more than 100gh/s from nicehaash.
the pools looks very interesting. I just pointed a miner to scrypt algo, but i see that the pools finds no blocks even when i added more than 100gh/s from nicehaash.
Hi,
Do you target particular coin or just scrypt? I know that Nicehash demanded certain difficulty for the pool, you get rejection of any kind because of that?
There are not that many people on scrypt, so I recommend to target low difficulty coins first.
I am happy to support and get things sorted, please let me know how does it go for you
) was 20 min long with average hashrate of 90gh/s and found nothing. Sometimes also coins were the TTF was 60s, no block after ten minutes. I hope you can understand me. Yes, I completelely understand, and would also like to understand what the hell happened there. We found some coins on this algo back in time, but targeting particular coin, hence it must be either very luck or something else. Do you remember coin with TTF on 60sec?
January 23, 2018, 04:31:10 PM
Hello,
the pools looks very interesting. I just pointed a miner to scrypt algo, but i see that the pools finds no blocks even when i added more than 100gh/s from nicehaash.
the pools looks very interesting. I just pointed a miner to scrypt algo, but i see that the pools finds no blocks even when i added more than 100gh/s from nicehaash.
Hi,
Do you target particular coin or just scrypt? I know that Nicehash demanded certain difficulty for the pool, you get rejection of any kind because of that?
There are not that many people on scrypt, so I recommend to target low difficulty coins first.
I am happy to support and get things sorted, please let me know how does it go for you
) was 20 min long with average hashrate of 90gh/s and found nothing. Sometimes also coins were the TTF was 60s, no block after ten minutes. I hope you can understand me. January 23, 2018, 04:18:23 PM
Getting sporadic drops in stratum availability for most of the coins I'm trying to mine (C11/Xevan). Works for 5-10 minutes, then dies and doesn't come back for a while.
What command do you run, password argument?
I had used "workername,c=FLAX" for the c11 mining password (using option 3 with a preestablished BTC address as userid). I am wondering now if the workername part is causing some confusion for your coin detection logic. I'll try again without the workername and see if that helps.
c11 picked up and was running for me with the ID=$workername in my SniffDog script and was mining the proper coin since interzone is non auto trade
I think that was good but if not where does the interzone coins go?
Just was curious about LTC payouts... if users use a lightcoin address instead of btc address and a LTC symbol in the password... will the user get paid in litecoin?
Btw... thanks for neoscrypt being lowered... I'm finally hitting some shares
1. Regarding c11. So you saying you specified BTC wallet and ITZ for picked for you in Option 1? Can you please post wallet address, I will check details. Normally it should prevent you to mine ITZ in Option 1.
2. Yes, it will be exchanged and you will be payed. I am just on my way to get LTC thresholds setup higher than BTC.
no I had bitcoin wallet to c=BTC.... nvm stupid question
Thank you for replying to litecoin question... I just released SniffDog 4.0 with Zergpool... Welcome!
January 23, 2018, 04:11:11 PM
FYI, AMS wallet is out of sync...looks to be 20 blocks behind the chain supported by most of the masternodes. Attempts to mine it don't really work and I get bumped to another Xexan coin instead.
Back to trying to mine Neoscrypt/ORB for a while.
EDIT: I'm an idiot...hadn't noticed the new "mc=COIN" switch from the "c=COIN" logic. New password is now "c=BTC,mc=COIN" for a BTC payout address.
Back to trying to mine Neoscrypt/ORB for a while.
EDIT: I'm an idiot...hadn't noticed the new "mc=COIN" switch from the "c=COIN" logic. New password is now "c=BTC,mc=COIN" for a BTC payout address.
Are you certain regarding AMS?
https://www.amsterdamblockchain.info/ shows the same zergpool.com. Also pool updates website not as frequently as blockchain is, you can find correct block height by looking into mining command line output.
PS: I will join you in ORB then!
January 23, 2018, 04:09:30 PM
Getting sporadic drops in stratum availability for most of the coins I'm trying to mine (C11/Xevan). Works for 5-10 minutes, then dies and doesn't come back for a while.
What command do you run, password argument?
I had used "workername,c=FLAX" for the c11 mining password (using option 3 with a preestablished BTC address as userid). I am wondering now if the workername part is causing some confusion for your coin detection logic. I'll try again without the workername and see if that helps.
c11 picked up and was running for me with the ID=$workername in my SniffDog script and was mining the proper coin since interzone is non auto trade
I think that was good but if not where does the interzone coins go?
Just was curious about LTC payouts... if users use a lightcoin address instead of btc address and a LTC symbol in the password... will the user get paid in litecoin?
Btw... thanks for neoscrypt being lowered... I'm finally hitting some shares
1. Regarding c11. So you saying you specified BTC wallet and ITZ was picked for you in Option 1? Can you please post wallet address, I will check details. Normally it should prevent you to mine ITZ in Option 1.
2. Yes, it will be exchanged and you will be payed. I am just on my way to get LTC thresholds setup higher than BTC.
January 23, 2018, 04:06:38 PM
Hello,
the pools looks very interesting. I just pointed a miner to scrypt algo, but i see that the pools finds no blocks even when i added more than 100gh/s from nicehaash.
the pools looks very interesting. I just pointed a miner to scrypt algo, but i see that the pools finds no blocks even when i added more than 100gh/s from nicehaash.
Hi,
Do you target particular coin or just scrypt? I know that Nicehash demanded certain difficulty for the pool, you get rejection of any kind because of that?
There are not that many people on scrypt, so I recommend to target low difficulty coins first.
I am happy to support and get things sorted, please let me know how does it go for you
January 23, 2018, 03:46:58 PM
Are you able to add how many miners are mining each coin? I know you have a count of miners on each algorithm.
January 23, 2018, 03:43:19 PM
FYI, AMS wallet is out of sync...looks to be 20 blocks behind the chain supported by most of the masternodes. Attempts to mine it don't really work and I get bumped to another Xexan coin instead.
Back to trying to mine Neoscrypt/ORB for a while.
EDIT: I'm an idiot...hadn't noticed the new "mc=COIN" switch from the "c=COIN" logic. New password is now "c=BTC,mc=COIN" for a BTC payout address.
Back to trying to mine Neoscrypt/ORB for a while.
EDIT: I'm an idiot...hadn't noticed the new "mc=COIN" switch from the "c=COIN" logic. New password is now "c=BTC,mc=COIN" for a BTC payout address.
January 23, 2018, 03:34:55 PM
Getting sporadic drops in stratum availability for most of the coins I'm trying to mine (C11/Xevan). Works for 5-10 minutes, then dies and doesn't come back for a while.
What command do you run, password argument?
I had used "workername,c=FLAX" for the c11 mining password (using option 3 with a preestablished BTC address as userid). I am wondering now if the workername part is causing some confusion for your coin detection logic. I'll try again without the workername and see if that helps.
c11 picked up and was running for me with the ID=$workername in my SniffDog script and was mining the proper coin since interzone is non auto trade
I think that was good but if not where does the interzone coins go?
Just was curious about LTC payouts... if users use a lightcoin address instead of btc address and a LTC symbol in the password... will the user get paid in litecoin?
Btw... thanks for neoscrypt being lowered... I'm finally hitting some shares
January 23, 2018, 03:31:51 PM
Hello,
the pools looks very interesting. I just pointed a miner to scrypt algo, but i see that the pools finds no blocks even when i added more than 100gh/s from nicehaash.
the pools looks very interesting. I just pointed a miner to scrypt algo, but i see that the pools finds no blocks even when i added more than 100gh/s from nicehaash.
January 23, 2018, 03:28:27 PM
Getting sporadic drops in stratum availability for most of the coins I'm trying to mine (C11/Xevan). Works for 5-10 minutes, then dies and doesn't come back for a while.
What command do you run, password argument?
I had used "workername,c=FLAX" for the c11 mining password (using option 3 with a preestablished BTC address as userid). I am wondering now if the workername part is causing some confusion for your coin detection logic. I'll try again without the workername and see if that helps.
January 23, 2018, 03:26:39 PM
Still monitoring....
Can my script include a c=BTC at the end of a btc address... just makes my life easier when it's time to add you
Also, retired Alexis in newest update and now running with Tpruvot HSR Alexis on most algos... better come check your Sniffdog...I'm letting all the pools with Sniffdog know...
links are below
Can my script include a c=BTC at the end of a btc address... just makes my life easier when it's time to add you
Also, retired Alexis in newest update and now running with Tpruvot HSR Alexis on most algos... better come check your Sniffdog...I'm letting all the pools with Sniffdog know...
links are below
Very good, I will look into this. Currently my pool is customized a bit differently, giving more flexibility when it comes to mining. (e.g. you can have it both auto-exchange and direct mining).
I will have to update stratum a bit to support c=BTC. At the moment it will first regiter your address as BTC, and afterwards will try to mine exactly BTC
I know how to do it, I just need a time. I think I will leave c=BTC as on other pools to identify payout wallet, and will introduce mc=SYMBOL(mc will stand for mining coin) to target some particular coin.
Now I need some sleep, see you folks!
Sounds good keep up the good work! and Peace!.... Sniffdog out
I have added support of c=BTC for Option 1. So it will work out of box with your Sniffdog release. And the of course if anyone wants to target particular coin, they can do it separately. And will rollout changes in 4 hours I think
Thank you!
EDIT: just noticing at homepage it shows c=BTC; is that correct or do we use c=BTC?
Stratum_recv_line failed
Running a bench- phi,xevan,c11,skein,equihash,groestl,bitcore,Nist5,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt,skunk,blake2s,x17,yescrypt,m7m(tribus,quark,scrypt)
can you lower neoscrypt stratum diff to 512 or 1024 please for smaller users? 16384 is a little high... 512 would be ideal
having issues with equihash miner is dropping off...it is porting at your address
Blake2s API is down
Stratum diff for scrypt seems high at 524288( I usually don't have this algo open in SniffDog)
That was misstype. just c=BTC.
I lowered stratum diff for neo. Scrypt I will keep as this is requirement for Nicehash renting.
Equihash is back online too.
I actually don't have any blake2s yet. Does it prevent you from adding my pool?
no your fine with Blake2s... SniffDog will pickup the competition blake2s algo API and leave yours out till you get yours up and running...
If a user puts in a LTC address and places c=LTC in password(or any other Wallet address and password) will Zergpool autotrade coins to that LTC address?
January 23, 2018, 03:24:06 PM
Still monitoring....
Can my script include a c=BTC at the end of a btc address... just makes my life easier when it's time to add you
Also, retired Alexis in newest update and now running with Tpruvot HSR Alexis on most algos... better come check your Sniffdog...I'm letting all the pools with Sniffdog know...
links are below
Can my script include a c=BTC at the end of a btc address... just makes my life easier when it's time to add you
Also, retired Alexis in newest update and now running with Tpruvot HSR Alexis on most algos... better come check your Sniffdog...I'm letting all the pools with Sniffdog know...
links are below
Very good, I will look into this. Currently my pool is customized a bit differently, giving more flexibility when it comes to mining. (e.g. you can have it both auto-exchange and direct mining).
I will have to update stratum a bit to support c=BTC. At the moment it will first regiter your address as BTC, and afterwards will try to mine exactly BTC
I know how to do it, I just need a time. I think I will leave c=BTC as on other pools to identify payout wallet, and will introduce mc=SYMBOL(mc will stand for mining coin) to target some particular coin.
Now I need some sleep, see you folks!
Sounds good keep up the good work! and Peace!.... Sniffdog out
I have added support of c=BTC for Option 1. So it will work out of box with your Sniffdog release. And the of course if anyone wants to target particular coin, they can do it separately. And will rollout changes in 4 hours I think
Thank you!
EDIT: just noticing at homepage it shows c=BTC; is that correct or do we use c=BTC?
Stratum_recv_line failed
Running a bench- phi,xevan,c11,skein,equihash,groestl,bitcore,Nist5,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt,skunk,blake2s,x17,yescrypt,m7m(tribus,quark,scrypt)
can you lower neoscrypt stratum diff to 512 or 1024 please for smaller users? 16384 is a little high... 512 would be ideal
having issues with equihash miner is dropping off...it is porting at your address
Blake2s API is down
Stratum diff for scrypt seems high at 524288( I usually don't have this algo open in SniffDog)
That was misstype. just c=BTC.
I lowered stratum diff for neo. Scrypt I will keep as this is requirement for Nicehash renting.
Equihash is back online too.
I actually don't have any blake2s yet. Does it prevent you from adding my pool?
January 23, 2018, 02:53:02 PM
Getting sporadic drops in stratum availability for most of the coins I'm trying to mine (C11/Xevan). Works for 5-10 minutes, then dies and doesn't come back for a while.
What command do you run, password argument?
Jump to: