People that actually mine on ZergPool and have also used ZPOOL -- how do they compare ?
I have used ZPOOL quite a bit in the past and still some at present... also Ahashpool and Hashrefinery.
Always went back to ZPOOL out of those three.
Currently most of my power aimed at NiceHash until I decide which multi-pool to hop onto again.
Topic: [ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 62. (Read 57959 times)
March 17, 2018, 01:21:21 PM
March 17, 2018, 09:33:14 AM
UPDATE
1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data. Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.
2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.
3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date
1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data. Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.
2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.
3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date
Hi pinpins, I'm a new user for your pool.
Is it recommended to use multialgo change? Or its better to mine 1 coin which is the most profitable?
And if I do the Option 2 or 3, will those immature coins that I'm not mining anymore will still go to my btc balance?
TIA. I cant read 50+pages so I'm just straight to the point asking
I think it is better to use multi algo switch to hunt for best profits. Though some find Option 3 good, as would like to stick with particular profitable coin. I suggest to try it differently for 24h.
Yes, immature will convert to balance, it will take some time
March 17, 2018, 08:10:46 AM
UPDATE
1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data. Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.
2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.
3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date
1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data. Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.
2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.
3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date
Hi pinpins, I'm a new user for your pool.
Is it recommended to use multialgo change? Or its better to mine 1 coin which is the most profitable?
And if I do the Option 2 or 3, will those immature coins that I'm not mining anymore will still go to my btc balance?
TIA. I cant read 50+pages so I'm just straight to the point asking
March 17, 2018, 04:58:09 AM
UPDATE
1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data. Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.
2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.
3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date
1. I have been conducing analysis for 24h actual last night. Disovery is that more users have started to use direct mining for many algos.(option 2&3 with mc parameter). Which effectivly mean they mine it outside of pool algo switch procedure, and sometimes mine less profitable coins etc. However yiimp was designed in the way to calculate all blocks found against all hash submitted. I have been able to distinguish Option 1 hash, and now looking into getting right proportion of only appropriate blocks value connected to Option 1 for 24h actual data. Once I am completed it should provide more accurate 24h actual for coin switch mode(option 1). Current estimate and 24h estimate though is based on Option 1 mining already and should be ok already.
2. Changed DDoS vendor for US server as well as EU. All ports are tested, though, don't hesitate to contact me if some port/algo gives you a problem.
3. Next weekend there will be short 15mins maintenance connected to adding more powerful HW. Will post exact time on web site closer to the date
March 17, 2018, 04:56:16 AM
I use europe.mine.zergpool 
March 17, 2018, 02:19:22 AM
Who uses it?
ZERGPOOL
ZERGPOOLPLUS
ZERGPOOL24H
Which one is the most profitable?
ZERGPOOL
ZERGPOOLPLUS
ZERGPOOL24H
Which one is the most profitable?
March 17, 2018, 12:52:56 AM
I'm new to mining with zergpool and have been reading comments of you..
So what is it really, is it a good pool to use or not?
Sorry new to mining Im finding the most profitable pool that I can use my rig to.
So what is it really, is it a good pool to use or not?
Sorry new to mining Im finding the most profitable pool that I can use my rig to.
March 16, 2018, 03:58:05 PM
I think that is indeed a fair complaint. Pinpin has done little to reclaim lost ground... and does not answer legit complaints fast enough (though few are legit and rather most are n00bs being n00bs).
For the past hour or so US stratum has been down. Zip from pinpin. Is it because of a server upgrade? Who knows. This type of thing has to be handled ASAP for zerg to grow... or it will die. I have moved over to blaze until it IS fixed and users are told what happened, why it happened, and how it will not happen again.
For the past hour or so US stratum has been down. Zip from pinpin. Is it because of a server upgrade? Who knows. This type of thing has to be handled ASAP for zerg to grow... or it will die. I have moved over to blaze until it IS fixed and users are told what happened, why it happened, and how it will not happen again.
March 16, 2018, 08:26:14 AM
UPDATE
1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so
It's not fees that drive people away from your pool. Look at other pools, nearly everyone there has a fee, 0.5-2% is pretty standard.1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so
If you put similar fees and arrange better stability and better service and better features, you'll catch them up.
Agree, but now it's kinda late to do it better as many people have zergpool in the blacklist. So many complains and no reply from admin, he only post things when he wants.
March 16, 2018, 07:18:50 AM
Sorry for any inconveniences encountered with any pool issues.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
You make me laugh. You do realize that you encourage users to use current profitability to make it easier for you to steal more coins ?
The problem is that current profitability statistics are impossible to track, and you think that you are safe, but the real difference is in actual 24h statistics and also more than that in real BTC daily payments.
You use the same pool management software as aHashPool and you claim to have 0% pool fee and you also claim to have 0% exchange fee, and I am 100% sure your EXCHANGE_FEE is at least 10%. Besides that I made tests with identical rigs on the same time and using current statistics on your pool compared to aHashPool and your pool paid 20% less in BTC after day after day of testing.
At least 10% of your income can be lost also because of too weak server, rent one like this one https://www.ovh.ie/dedicated_servers/enterprise/1801mg04.xml or use more servers because you should have an income of 3 BTC per day because aHashPool pays 6BTC every day for 6000 miners. You have 3000 miners and you only pay only 1,5 BTC per day (2 payments of 0,6 BTC every 12 hours).
Taking this into consideration, because you use the same yiimp pool management software, either you manage your pool very bad, or you steal a part of the income from all your miners and miners have to ask you to pay them on this forum.
So, you write on your homepage that exchange fee is 20% and stop stealing coins.
You are like a gypsy from Romania that is stealing and misleading everyone, instead of being fair and take care of your server that is offline most of the time.
Fuckin Trolls... You dumb MF's cannot even read a graph. You think it's all plug and play. I'll load up sniffdog and get rich. Mine these shit coins and get me some BTC. Ignorant cocksuckers. Learn how to mine. You have no clue, your just trashing this pool. Get the fuck out and go mine somewhere else. Plenty of places out there... Every fucking day I make better money here than anywhere else... Am I special? Or are you just stupid? In my book your just stupid. You do not know how to mine, you do not understand crypto...Your just stupid... Get the fuck out... Move on... Your to stupid to mine in this pool. Go back to doing her nails... Your way out of your league.
I'm a stupid troll.
But I know zergpool's server had downed many times and attacked and stolen BTC. Is it a really fact or not?
I don't know. Some special people will know it.
Good luck.
March 16, 2018, 06:42:12 AM
UPDATE
1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so
It's not fees that drive people away from your pool. Look at other pools, nearly everyone there has a fee, 0.5-2% is pretty standard.1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so
If you put similar fees and arrange better stability and better service and better features, you'll catch them up.
March 16, 2018, 06:35:21 AM
If your quality of service is good or it can get better then I'm fine with any fee up to 1%. I just started trying Zergpool so I don't know yet if you're more profitable than other options or not.
My only "complain" so far is that I can't see when did you exchange my mined coins and with what rate.
My only "complain" so far is that I can't see when did you exchange my mined coins and with what rate.
March 16, 2018, 05:12:21 AM
UPDATE
1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so
1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so
so take 1% per week I think no one will be against
тaк вoзмитe 1% зa нeдeлю я дyмaю никтo пpoтив нe бyдeт
March 16, 2018, 05:04:47 AM
UPDATE
1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so
1. We need to purchase more powerful servers, so enabling 0.5% fee for a week or so
March 16, 2018, 03:06:40 AM
Sorry for any inconveniences encountered with any pool issues.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
You make me laugh. You do realize that you encourage users to use current profitability to make it easier for you to steal more coins ?
The problem is that current profitability statistics are impossible to track, and you think that you are safe, but the real difference is in actual 24h statistics and also more than that in real BTC daily payments.
You use the same pool management software as aHashPool and you claim to have 0% pool fee and you also claim to have 0% exchange fee, and I am 100% sure your EXCHANGE_FEE is at least 10%. Besides that I made tests with identical rigs on the same time and using current statistics on your pool compared to aHashPool and your pool paid 20% less in BTC after day after day of testing.
At least 10% of your income can be lost also because of too weak server, rent one like this one https://www.ovh.ie/dedicated_servers/enterprise/1801mg04.xml or use more servers because you should have an income of 3 BTC per day because aHashPool pays 6BTC every day for 6000 miners. You have 3000 miners and you only pay only 1,5 BTC per day (2 payments of 0,6 BTC every 12 hours).
Taking this into consideration, because you use the same yiimp pool management software, either you manage your pool very bad, or you steal a part of the income from all your miners and miners have to ask you to pay them on this forum.
So, you write on your homepage that exchange fee is 20% and stop stealing coins.
You are like a gypsy from Romania that is stealing and misleading everyone, instead of being fair and take care of your server that is offline most of the time.
Fuckin Trolls... You dumb MF's cannot even read a graph. You think it's all plug and play. I'll load up sniffdog and get rich. Mine these shit coins and get me some BTC. Ignorant cocksuckers. Learn how to mine. You have no clue, your just trashing this pool. Get the fuck out and go mine somewhere else. Plenty of places out there... Every fucking day I make better money here than anywhere else... Am I special? Or are you just stupid? In my book your just stupid. You do not know how to mine, you do not understand crypto...Your just stupid... Get the fuck out... Move on... Your to stupid to mine in this pool. Go back to doing her nails... Your way out of your league.
March 15, 2018, 09:59:56 PM
Tried the pool for a couple of hours with a cgminer at 260Mh of scrypt.
Average hashrate accepted by the pool was about 180Mh, no matter how I played around coins and difficulties.
Unfortunately, it was a rented asic, so I don't have access to its logs.
I'm not going to make any accusations, but the fact is that my experiment got 30% of hashrate lost for some reason...
Average hashrate accepted by the pool was about 180Mh, no matter how I played around coins and difficulties.
Unfortunately, it was a rented asic, so I don't have access to its logs.
I'm not going to make any accusations, but the fact is that my experiment got 30% of hashrate lost for some reason...
Wow~~~~~~!!!!!!
I also had mined skein algorithm for several days in the zergpool and I had checked my real BTC earnings.
My own real BTC earnings and 24 hours actual calculating are different about 30.5%.
It's similar to your experiment. Neoscrypt and xevan algorithm are also similar.
My hashrates are 41.9G on skein algo.
24 hours real BTC earnings : 0.011253 BTC
24 hours actual calculating : 0.016191 BTC
Only pinpin knows. He always takes 30% of miners coins or 24hours actual calculating shows 30% upped.
Now I'm using ahashpool. Ahashpool shows real 24hours actual caculating with just 1% fees.
Can you paste your wallet address?
24h actual at the moment suggests ~ 0,01476 BTC for 41Gh on sken
My wallet address is 1KvSpzSjrJjjMcdxcvmjoehhGsbWuEx65L.
Today I had found 1 more. My BTC earning was 0.011253 BTC, but real payment was 0.01064334 in 13d ago.
Thank you for taking my money.
Following image is my hashrate on ahashpool. Average is 36GH and I have two more rigs. 41GH is real average hashrate showing on pool and If you want I can show you.
It's not a peak and just calculation.
https://imgur.com/7884wDK
March 15, 2018, 08:14:48 PM
Sorry for any inconveniences encountered with any pool issues.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
You make me laugh. You do realize that you encourage users to use current profitability to make it easier for you to steal more coins ?
The problem is that current profitability statistics are impossible to track, and you think that you are safe, but the real difference is in actual 24h statistics and also more than that in real BTC daily payments.
You use the same pool management software as aHashPool and you claim to have 0% pool fee and you also claim to have 0% exchange fee, and I am 100% sure your EXCHANGE_FEE is at least 10%. Besides that I made tests with identical rigs on the same time and using current statistics on your pool compared to aHashPool and your pool paid 20% less in BTC after day after day of testing.
At least 10% of your income can be lost also because of too weak server, rent one like this one https://www.ovh.ie/dedicated_servers/enterprise/1801mg04.xml or use more servers because you should have an income of 3 BTC per day because aHashPool pays 6BTC every day for 6000 miners. You have 3000 miners and you only pay only 1,5 BTC per day (2 payments of 0,6 BTC every 12 hours).
Taking this into consideration, because you use the same yiimp pool management software, either you manage your pool very bad, or you steal a part of the income from all your miners and miners have to ask you to pay them on this forum.
So, you write on your homepage that exchange fee is 20% and stop stealing coins.
You are like a gypsy from Romania that is stealing and misleading everyone, instead of being fair and take care of your server that is offline most of the time.
That's why mining software have hard-coded exactly 20% less profitability for zergpool when compared with aHashPool
Below is the code from the mining software :
"Pools profit correction factors
--Usually pools revenue is overestimated, this factor allows manual correction (Profit= ReportedPoolProfit * @@POOLPROFITFACTOR)
--This values are based on experience
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_AHASHPOOL=0.7
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_NICEHASH=1
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_MININGPOOLHUB=0.8
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_ZPOOL=0.7
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_ZERGPOOL=0.5
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_BLAZEPOOL=0.7
"
Wow! Wonderful. Thank you for your poolprofitfactors of each pools. It will be very very helpful to me.
I also had tested Ahashpool and zergpool. Ahashpool shows real 24hours actual statistics, and real BTC earnings are almost same.
Zergpool's earnings are about 30% more smaller than 24hours actual statistics in Neoscrypt, skein, xevan.
I agree zergpool is good, but zergpool need to be show "real" 24hours actual statistics.
Now I'm using ahashpool and miningpoolhub.
March 15, 2018, 06:43:41 PM
Or it simply could be that you are a n00b moron not picking your alogs properly. Some pools are better for certain alogs than others. Pick wisely and change them based on the 24avg. Do that and zerg beats blaze and AHP routinely... or actually don't. Let the smart miners get the higher percent while you whine like a little bitch.
March 15, 2018, 12:02:13 PM
Sorry for any inconveniences encountered with any pool issues.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
You make me laugh. You do realize that you encourage users to use current profitability to make it easier for you to steal more coins ?
The problem is that current profitability statistics are impossible to track, and you think that you are safe, but the real difference is in actual 24h statistics and also more than that in real BTC daily payments.
You use the same pool management software as aHashPool and you claim to have 0% pool fee and you also claim to have 0% exchange fee, and I am 100% sure your EXCHANGE_FEE is at least 10%. Besides that I made tests with identical rigs on the same time and using current statistics on your pool compared to aHashPool and your pool paid 20% less in BTC after day after day of testing.
At least 10% of your income can be lost also because of too weak server, rent one like this one https://www.ovh.ie/dedicated_servers/enterprise/1801mg04.xml or use more servers because you should have an income of 3 BTC per day because aHashPool pays 6BTC every day for 6000 miners. You have 3000 miners and you only pay only 1,5 BTC per day (2 payments of 0,6 BTC every 12 hours).
Taking this into consideration, because you use the same yiimp pool management software, either you manage your pool very bad, or you steal a part of the income from all your miners and miners have to ask you to pay them on this forum.
So, you write on your homepage that exchange fee is 20% and stop stealing coins.
You are like a gypsy from Romania that is stealing and misleading everyone, instead of being fair and take care of your server that is offline most of the time.
That's why mining software have hard-coded exactly 20% less profitability for zergpool when compared with aHashPool
Below is the code from the mining software :
"Pools profit correction factors
--Usually pools revenue is overestimated, this factor allows manual correction (Profit= ReportedPoolProfit * @@POOLPROFITFACTOR)
--This values are based on experience
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_AHASHPOOL=0.7
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_NICEHASH=1
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_MININGPOOLHUB=0.8
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_ZPOOL=0.7
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_ZERGPOOL=0.5
@@POOLPROFITFACTOR_BLAZEPOOL=0.7
"
March 15, 2018, 11:57:04 AM
Sorry for any inconveniences encountered with any pool issues.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
For the more reliable earning estimates, I would recommended to refer to 24h estimated and 24h actual data at the pool. To maximize earnings using any profit switching software you should use current estimate. However it is indeed changing as network difficulties and coin prices do.
You make me laugh. You do realize that you encourage users to use current profitability to make it easier for you to steal more coins ?
The problem is that current profitability statistics are impossible to track, and you think that you are safe, but the real difference is in actual 24h statistics and also more than that in real BTC daily payments.
You use the same pool management software as aHashPool and you claim to have 0% pool fee and you also claim to have 0% exchange fee, and I am 100% sure your EXCHANGE_FEE is at least 10%. Besides that I made tests with identical rigs on the same time and using current statistics on your pool compared to aHashPool and your pool paid 20% less in BTC after day after day of testing.
At least 10% of your income can be lost also because of too weak server, rent one like this one https://www.ovh.ie/dedicated_servers/enterprise/1801mg04.xml or use more servers because you should have an income of 3 BTC per day because aHashPool pays 6BTC every day for 6000 miners. You have 3000 miners and you only pay only 1,5 BTC per day (2 payments of 0,6 BTC every 12 hours).
Taking this into consideration, because you use the same yiimp pool management software, either you manage your pool very bad, or you steal a part of the income from all your miners and miners have to ask you to pay them on this forum.
So, you write on your homepage that exchange fee is 20% and stop stealing coins.
You are like a gypsy from Romania that is stealing and misleading everyone, instead of being fair and take care of your server that is offline most of the time.
Jump to: