Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][POW][CLO] Callisto Network - Cold Staking & Security Audits - page 53. (Read 89893 times)

copper member
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Hi team!

We just launched a new ICO platform in Korea called CoinFocus.

We are offering FREE listing and banner services for soft launch promotion. Get in touch with us on Telegram or via our services page! The ICO packages are right now +60% off!

Good luck on your token sale!!  Grin

Very best,
Katherine from CoinFocus
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 111
Four months old project.
The progress looks good to me.

Are you kidding? Not progress, but regress. A highly specialized project, as it turned out. 6 000 000 coins for this small auditor organization is too much.

Progress can be if there is:

1. Free creation of smart contracts for ANY customer who has CLO on his account.
2. Free audit of smart contracts at the request of ANY community member who has CLO on his account.
3. Holding 1000 meetups in 1000 cities around the world where like-minded people should conduct a brainstorm and draw up a technical assignment for a smart contract of an arbitrary kind. All CLO holders should receive some preferences in these smart contracts.
4. Reimbursement of expenses to those organizers of meetups who will submit the terms of reference for the smart contract and photo / video content about the meetup.

+ it is necessary to reduce the appetites of the founders
newbie
Activity: 128
Merit: 0
Callisto Network is a decentralized crypto open source platform based on the Go-Ethereum source code with its own 'CLO' cryptocurrency. Callisto researches and develops reference implementation of the blockchain ecosystem and develops an independent, independent and self-funded environment.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Four months old project.
The progress looks good to me.

Are you kidding? Not progress, but regress. A highly specialized project, as it turned out. 6 000 000 000 coins for this small auditor organization is too much.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Four months old project.
The progress looks good to me.
member
Activity: 219
Merit: 10
Today, Callisto Network fell below 100 satoshi.
Honesly, I feel very negatively about those current downward movements of Callisto Network.
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 111
newbie
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
Only the prospect of growth keeps investors. Now it is clear that we do not have any sense to expect growth.

HitBTC will not help out here.
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 1
Here is what I read on github:
Quote
yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.






So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).


I've told you many times, in plain English. Our priority - security for blockchain ecosystem, in particular: free smart contract audits for developers.


Are you kidding? Smart contract developer running ICO, and never had a GitHub account?


I would rather block your affiliate account for fraudulent attempts, then believe in such bs.


 

Why loud words? Your concern was to increase the price of the CLO. There will be no price - there will not be your work.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Here is what I read on github:
Quote
yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.






So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).


I've told you many times, in plain English. Our priority - security for blockchain ecosystem, in particular: free smart contract audits for developers.


Are you kidding? Smart contract developer running ICO, and never had a GitHub account?


I would rather block your affiliate account for fraudulent attempts, then believe in such bs.


 

They did not use it and are not going to do it in the future.

And I'm not going to work with an unprofessional partner program you have made.
You have big problems with strategy. There's no point in wasting energy on this coin.
Only time has lost, a pancake.

newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
As far as I remember, this project did not have much success before. But now it has become a very useful project for earning our wallet and a high price for BTC.
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 111
Here is what I read on github:
Quote
yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.






So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).


I've told you many times, in plain English. Our priority - security for blockchain ecosystem, in particular: free smart contract audits for developers.


Are you kidding? Smart contract developer running ICO, and never had a GitHub account?


I would rather block your affiliate account for fraudulent attempts, then believe in such bs.


 

They did not use it and are not going to do it in the future.

And I'm not going to work with an unprofessional partner program you have made.
You have big problems with strategy. There's no point in wasting energy on this coin.
Only time has lost, a pancake.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Your priority should be comprehensive assistance to increase the demand for CLO.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Here is what I read on github:
Quote
yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.






So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).


I've told you many times, in plain English. Our priority - security for blockchain ecosystem, in particular: free smart contract audits for developers.


Are you kidding? Smart contract developer running ICO, and never had a GitHub account?


I would rather block your affiliate account for fraudulent attempts, then believe in such bs.


 
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 111
Here is what I read on github:
Quote
yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.






So stimulating the use of CLO to speed up the audit of smart contracts is not your priority?

P.S.
About github.
I know for sure that the developers sent 3 smart contracts, which the senders of  can confirm by sending ETH from the addresses of the creators. They do not have and never had a github account. They have registered specifically for this.
If you had more desire to find clients, then you would have found out with them in the correspondence.
I will not invite anyone else (until you figure it out).
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Here is what I read on github:
Quote
yuriy77k commented 13 hours ago
If you interesting in audit this project http://tradelize.com you can ask their team to make request for our free audit. If it's not a scam they will agree, in other way no audit needed.

 @AmirSlavo
 
AmirSlavo commented an hour ago
@yuriy77k They will tell me that the audit is conducted and will give a link to their company of auditors or which they bought. And what would you advise further, oh my "smart" friend? Maybe you're an expert in the audit, but as an analyst you're shit.
Free advice. Order the research in a good analytical company. Let them advise you, programming geniuses, on what clients you need to count on. Several hundred developers or several hundred thousand investors? If for you the answer is unobvious!

Order a market research from specialists. You have the means.

In my understanding, the investor is right. They are more than a thousand times. This investors are the main customers of this project!

Or did you decide to make a school of programmers? And your goal is to point out the mistakes of newcomers and thereby increase the number of good specialists?

P.S.
I'll make a last effort to work with you. I'll order contextual advertising. If, after orders from there, you refuse to pay under the pretext that it is not the developers ordered, then I'm sorry, I'll write everything that I think about it.

As it was mentioned on our white paper, and on our site: We doing audits for developers not for investors.

We can't and won't audit smart contracts without direct connection with the developer. Our disclosure policy clearly states that critical vulnerabilities should be reported to the smart contract developer.

When you asking us for the audit of smart contact for the third party, you basically pushing us to help hackers doing free security research and making them available for the general public.

To make it clear: we do not audit smart contracts by third-party requests.




newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
can someone please show us where to get an updated roadmap for this coin (whitepaper if available but i really don't care about that at this point).

also, is CLO pushing for exchange adds?  lol this coin is nothing but dead since launch as it has the usual pnd, just like ETC pumped once this was hype and then etc dumped to shit too LOL.  so much useless shit if nothing gets done. so let's see some results.

on https://callisto.network/
you can find a big green button with direct link to the current white paper: https://whitepaper.callisto.network/

Also worth to mention News section on our blog: https://callisto.network/blog/topic/news/

where is all work progress announced
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0

A smart audit contract can only be sent by the developer?

No anyone, but it would be fair if the developer send the request and publish hers/his audit badge.

It will be fair if the investor checks the suspicious project before investing.

Our Whitepaper states:

"a completely free opportunity for a professional smart-contract developer to audit their smart-contract. "  

According to the disclosure policy, we must report critical problems to the author and not to the third party.

The purpose of audit of smart contracts is to create a large queue of orders in order for customers to buy CLO for placement on a deposit in order to speed up the audit of their smart contract?
If YES, then why do you prevent me from creating this queue?

If some error prevents the development of the project, then you must correct it.

The purpose of the Callisto Security Department its improvement of blockchain security. It reduces risk and smart contract vulnerabilities and increases the adoption of programmable blockchains for the whole crypto industry.

As for your question about your leads: it's clearly stated in Affiliate Program Terms, that only qualified leads got paid.  Obviously, you can't create a new account on GitHub, copy some random solidity code and got affiliate payout for this bs.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 250
What I see in this Kingdom, not all goes as smoothly as many would like. All the good drops in the distribution at the beginning. And then it becomes just a long and tedious expectation of growth.
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 1
I think this is a good project, a clear direction, worth pursuing, hope the development team can go far in the future.
have project airdrop or bounty ?

here there will be neither airdrop, nor bounty))) all bounties are given out) we wait for market growth

There is no audit here either. One advertisement. I sent the application and I was not given any response. I'm more and more disappointed in this.
Pages:
Jump to: